Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 51

Thread: AvaTech SP1

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,296

    AvaTech SP1

    This thing is interesting:
    http://www.avatech.com/


    It's designed like a probe, except it measures slope angle, aspect, GPS location and snowpack structure and records it instantly.



    Super expensive and limited availability now, but some interesting technology for sure.

    Discuss.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    northeast
    Posts
    358
    Been following these guys for a bit, waiting for this thing to launch. Increased (and likely improved) data collection + subscription based networking via their "avanet" product. From a business perspective, I imagine professional adoption will be rapid (albeit limited); curious about consumer/recreational demand

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Breckenridge
    Posts
    726
    Yes, probably a good idea for now to limit it to 'Industry Professionals' since it will increase likelyhood that the data is taken correctly and work any bugs, etc.

    I wouldn't be surprised in 2 years to see a version for advanced recreation type folks for $4-600 + $100/year subscription?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    northeast
    Posts
    358
    Quote Originally Posted by timmaio View Post
    Yes, probably a good idea for now to limit it to 'Industry Professionals' since it will increase likelyhood that the data is taken correctly and work any bugs, etc.

    I wouldn't be surprised in 2 years to see a version for advanced recreation type folks for $4-600 + $100/year subscription?
    Yes. I can also see many interested in a read-only subscription for non-professionals

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,609
    Heard about this last year. Pretty cool technology. Of course, first year tech always has it's drawbacks so we'll have to wait and see. It would be pretty cool if these were widely used enough where you could look online at a slope you wanted to ski and check the history of the snowpack throughout the season.



    There's gotta be some margin of user error that goes into these and I'm sure that offering it to avy pros only will help ensure reliable data for the first few years until they can make a dumbass-proof version for the rest of us to use. It will be interesting to see how this develops. I would imagine that avy sites like CAIC will have data published for free just like they already have under Obs and field reports. Seems like requiring a subscription to access the data would prevent the average BC enthusiast from using it, which would be pretty counterproductive to their cause.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,572
    My questions would be how much do the density profiles correspond to actual layer weakness, and as those layers gain strength does the density profile change in a similar way?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,609
    Quote Originally Posted by panchosdad View Post
    My questions would be how much do the density profiles correspond to actual layer weakness, and as those layers gain strength does the density profile change in a similar way?
    That's exactly what this device is showing you. Look at the second image that Adrenalated posted above. Can you see the weak layer? If you want to investigate further, you can still dig a pit and perform your tests, but it's pretty clear where your failures will be. Unless I misunderstood your question, which is highly likely. It's been while since winter.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,296
    I think another interesting thing that this device has the potential to help do is take some of the guessing out of the spatial variability game. It's unrealistic to dig pits every 5 feet across an entire slope to confirm/deny the extent of a weak layer's existence across the slope, but it's totally realistic to do a single traverse/ski cut and probe down every 5 feet with this thing.

    I can see digging a pit on a safe, representative slope, then using this device to test the slope you actually want to ski and see if the snowpack is in fact similar to your pit location, or completely different.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,609
    Maybe you could just javelin in into the middle of a slope and read it with binoculars to see if it's ok to ski.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,296
    Quote Originally Posted by shredgnar View Post
    Maybe you could just javelin in into the middle of a slope and read it with binoculars to see if it's ok to ski.
    Hah!

    I'm really in favor of explosives for recreational users, but somehow I don't think that'll ever take off.

    Or buying FOBP an avalauncher.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,868
    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post
    I'm really in favor of explosives for recreational users, but somehow I don't think that'll ever take off.
    If it did take off, I could see the market really exploding...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    78° 41′ 0″ N, 16° 24′ 0″ E
    Posts
    1,522
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Utah View Post
    Yes. I can also see many interested in a read-only subscription for non-professionals
    This. I think making it free would be the productive way to both boost users of the data and gain a market share that'll be hard to beat once the inevitable clones show up.

    Give it a year or so of productive testing with pros, then write some clever algorithms to interpret the data for novice users, release the free app and dominate your newly made market.
    simen@downskis.com DOWN SKIS

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Sodium Chloride, Honest Abe
    Posts
    324
    Reminds me of the old "Colorado snow pit" some of us used to use : you'd lean on your pole, encountering some mid-pack resistance, then the bottom would fall out and "clink!" into the rocks. "Yep, we're screwed".

    Seriously though, this could be useful tech. Will follow for sure. In the end though, electronics will not save us from ourselves.
    "The two best times to fish is when it's rainin' and when it ain't." - Rancid Crabtree

    "never buy anything you can't fuel with a salami sandwich" - XXX-er

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    16
    Does anyone know if the amount of force applied to the probe to puncture the layers will effect the result? Say someone really pushes it fast in and then someone pushes it slowly through will the results differ at all?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Maine Coast
    Posts
    4,680
    Saw a presentation on this product last year. I believe last winter was their second winter of field testing the product. Some wicked smart people behind this. As others have said this is designed for professional use, but the release of the data will give a much fuller picture of the snowpack. Hopefully their funding continues and it makes it to market.

    I too wondered about how the rate and force applied by the tester impacted the readings. They seem confident the design eliminates that problem.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,546
    Quote Originally Posted by skierhs View Post
    Does anyone know if the amount of force applied to the probe to puncture the layers will effect the result? Say someone really pushes it fast in and then someone pushes it slowly through will the results differ at all?
    They cover this on their website.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    16
    All I can find them talking about is how fast they can take every measurement, nothing about the users force that's applied.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,296
    You gotta read the FAQ page.

    Quote Originally Posted by AvaTech
    Does it matter how fast I probe?
    The SP1 stratigraphy collection is somewhat sensitive to speed, however, we have built in some intelligent speed dependency algorithms to limit the effects. For best results, use a constant speed with a full probe strike within 1-2 seconds. The device will beep once at the beginning of a test and twice at the end to help you probe at the optimal speed.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Couloirfornia
    Posts
    8,871
    Cool device. Going to be interesting to see the rollout.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernest_Hemingway View Post
    I realize there is not much hope for a bullfighting forum. I understand that most of you would prefer to discuss the ingredients of jacket fabrics than the ingredients of a brave man. I know nothing of the former. But the latter is made of courage, and skill, and grace in the presence of the possibility of death. If someone could make a jacket of those three things it would no doubt be the most popular and prized item in all of your closets.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,572
    Quote Originally Posted by shredgnar View Post
    That's exactly what this device is showing you. Look at the second image that Adrenalated posted above. Can you see the weak layer? If you want to investigate further, you can still dig a pit and perform your tests, but it's pretty clear where your failures will be. Unless I misunderstood your question, which is highly likely. It's been while since winter.
    I guess I was trying to distinguish between density, which is what this measures, and shear strength, which I think is ultimately what we're concerned about.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    138
    Just saw this on Backcountry Mag. Very cool stuff. I'm not the target market, yet, but I can definitely see how it would be attractive to pros and guys who spend substantial time in the BC. This article was good - http://mitsloan.mit.edu/newsroom/2014-avatech.php

    They have access to some serious resources if they got into the MIT accelerator. Seen some very cool tech come out of there. Excited to see how this progresses.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,609
    Quote Originally Posted by panchosdad View Post
    I guess I was trying to distinguish between density, which is what this measures, and shear strength, which I think is ultimately what we're concerned about.
    Yeah, AFAIK it won't give shear strength, Good point. So I figure you still have to dig a pit for that. But if you look at just the info that this device gives you, you can at least make an educated guess as to what the shear strength would be and where it would shear. But I'm used to a CO snowpack, where any hard layer over a weak layer will probably not bridge and will almost certainly fail. In a maritime snowpack, YMMV. Probably one of the many reasons that they are initially offering this device to pros.

    I'm mostly excited about the increase in data collection from professionals when this thing starts to be widely used. It might take a few years but this thing is definitely going to speed up the data collection process and it'll be interesting to see what comes of it.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    utar
    Posts
    2,743
    Is anyone from Utah Avalance Center reading this? I'd love to hear more about this at the annual workshop...
    Quote Originally Posted by SpinalTap View Post
    I'm really troubled by whatever pictures the Don had to search through to arrive at that one...

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    15,779
    Quote Originally Posted by panchosdad View Post
    I guess I was trying to distinguish between density, which is what this measures, and shear strength, which I think is ultimately what we're concerned about.
    Yeah, this is the part I'm trying to figure how/if this thing will help.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by panchosdad View Post
    I guess I was trying to distinguish between density, which is what this measures, and shear strength, which I think is ultimately what we're concerned about.
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    Yeah, this is the part I'm trying to figure how/if this thing will help.
    Definitely not giving you shear strength, but I don't think that matters. Unless you are carrying around a shear frame you aren't getting shear strength in your pits either. Regardless, modern fracture models are not shear based.

    This thing will essentially be just giving hardness profiles. Once you identify a layer of concern in a pit, you will be able to track its presence or absence as you travel to different slopes/elevations/aspects. Or you will notice a different layer that the hardness profile makes look suspect, then you can know that the snow is different and it will be worth digging a pit.

    Seems like it has the potential to be super useful, for both professionals now, and recreational users down the line.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •