Results 101 to 125 of 240
-
07-27-2014, 05:57 PM #101
Here's the link to the PDF.
http://friendsofsv.org/wp-content/up...or-control.pdf
There really isn't any new revelations, though its nice to see a major publication like the Wall Street Journal picking up on it.
-
08-06-2014, 11:11 PM #102
IOV Meeting Wrap Up: More Honesty And Answers
-
08-25-2014, 11:04 PM #103
Weighing In On Squaw Valley’s Contributions
Unofficial Alpine latest report on Save Olympic Valley's campaign against incorporation
-
09-01-2014, 12:55 PM #104
Almost $300,000 in contributions against incorporation
-
09-06-2014, 07:22 PM #105
Letter of Support For Incorporation
There has been some great letters of support for incorporation recently.
http://www.tahoedailytribune.com/new...ey-local-tahoe
http://www.tahoedailytribune.com/new...munity-olympic
http://unofficialalpine.com/?p=5759
-
09-06-2014, 07:49 PM #106
Based on other incorporations I've observed over the years LAFCO's decision will be made based on the economic findings, and the outcome will be decided by the registered voters. Hard to see how SV's PR campaign on the one side and a lot of letters and editorials on the other will have much if any influence.
-
09-09-2014, 08:04 PM #107
Squaw Valley contributions surpass $250K to challenge town
“Until the comprehensive fiscal analysis and revenue neutrality process is done, to say it’s not viable and to throw $250,000 to say that it’s not viable is crazy,” -Tom Day
“Incorporation is not about anti-development, it’s about having a stronger voice in the future of the community,” he said. “... At the end of the day, the outcome isn’t as important as who makes the decision of the outcome.” -Tom Day
http://www.tahoedailytribune.com/nor...olympic-fiscal
-
09-13-2014, 12:34 PM #108
Incorporate OV Board Chair on Tahoe TV
-
09-13-2014, 04:22 PM #109
The only actual news there's been lately is that company that was going to do the financial analysis bailed. Otherwise we keep hearing the same propaganda from both sides and occasional news articles and op ed pieces saying the same stuff.
-
09-15-2014, 11:03 AM #110
-
09-16-2014, 11:33 AM #111Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Posts
- 27
Repetition is Good!!! This FOV diatribe sounds a lot like the Manitoba mountain/Mountain riders alliance spew. bTW what ever happened to Manitoba mountain? did the new paradigm ever emerge?
Did the unicorns finally run out of farts and this is the new venture.
Does the FOV chairman even live in Squaw Valley or CA??!
-
09-16-2014, 01:57 PM #112
Who knows, but they sure like to use quotes from their board members to show .... something.
Live Free or Die
-
09-16-2014, 03:37 PM #113
-
09-16-2014, 06:49 PM #114
-
09-18-2014, 10:01 AM #115Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Posts
- 27
Same verbal mouth runs, all hype and bad PR pieces. Who cares if KSL spent 300 k in their campaign? iOV would spend the same if the had can't believe there isn't a thread for when Andy farts. This is just MRA with new social media handles.
-
09-18-2014, 10:04 AM #116Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Posts
- 27
Can't forget friends of alpine meadows too!!
-
09-19-2014, 09:16 PM #117
-
09-19-2014, 10:15 PM #118
-
09-20-2014, 09:17 AM #119Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Posts
- 27
Shames Mtn = Fail
Manitoba Mountain = Fail
MRA = Fail
not exactly the best group to lead us to the promised land.
-
09-20-2014, 10:16 AM #120
-
09-20-2014, 11:26 AM #121Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Posts
- 27
-
09-20-2014, 02:21 PM #122
^^ Your comparison makes no sense. And for the record, MRA is running Mt. Abram in Maine.
That also has zero to do with the valley incorporating, but thanks for contributing a bunch of complete nonsense.
-
09-20-2014, 03:52 PM #123Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Posts
- 27
-
09-20-2014, 10:02 PM #124
Naysayer, what's this crap attack on one dude just because he runs facebook pages ...that get hundreds of people talking ...and 22,000 visitors in a week looking at unofficialalpine.
The new group of 2nd homeowners seem like a sensible group (and they're definitely not co-op resort/sell am off/concrete hugging greenies).
Some of the pro-Sov eople are ambivalent about an unbridled corporation and its sphere's of undue influence.
Small businesses are also worried ...about KSL.
It jst surprises me that KSL has, so quickly, 'lost' so many people through ill conceived ideas and dubious brain farts. Are they full of career yes-men and yes-women who lack the guts to tell the top brass a few home truths?
-
09-21-2014, 11:35 AM #125
Bookmarks