Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vanity Fair
    Posts
    2,720

    why are these range tests not working anymore?

    This is the scenario:
    range tests are done every year in the same place with a variety of beacons. transmitting beacon is lying on the snow, searching beacon approaches in a straight line until there is a signal. alignment of searching and transmitting beacon is not changed. in the past years this has worked fine, with normal results. this time none of the results can be reproduced, range keeps changing between test runs (with the same beacons), etc. different beacons/ manufaturers all affected the same.

    place is on glacier ice, next to a groomer and t-bar. in the past this did not cause noticeable issues. nothing obvious has changed. any suggestions what it could be? (my ideas are WLAN in the resort messing stuff up, recently burried treasure, or aliens.)
    Ich bitte dich nur, weck mich nicht.

  2. #2
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Is there a dinosaur-tech analog beacon in the mix/could you ad one? It should be less susceptible to interference and/or would possibly give you audio clues to the source of interference if that's the problem. No electronic devices on the person executing the test?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Jackson
    Posts
    893
    Power/phone line added to T bar haul cable?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    22
    Did you or anyone else nearby have a cell/smartphone that was still left on in a jacket pocket?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SW Jongistan
    Posts
    451
    Trying to video the range tests with a gopro (or any device near the receiving beacon, really) ?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,553
    When you figure it out it might be useful to know what kind of fluctuation/deviation you were seeing and whether it was more noticeable in any particular beacon. Also when you say range keeps changing are you seeing changes in maximum receive distance compared to earlier tests or is distance to transmitting beacon once acquired actually varying on display as you proceed straight toward it?

    It sounds to me as if all likely culprits have already been suggested.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SnoqWA
    Posts
    2,622
    What kind of variation are you talking about? A couple meters or ten or ?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vanity Fair
    Posts
    2,720
    Thanks for the input. I should add I wasn't actually there, I was just asked to help brainstorm. These people do this stuff a lot, in a very routine manner, so they wouldn't have gopros or phones or something like that lying around. The issue was with maximum range, as in "at what point do I first get a clear signal when walking towards the transmitting beacon". Results were different from previous tests and also differed between runs on the same day, with the same beacons. Variations 10+ meters.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    Is there a dinosaur-tech analog beacon in the mix/could you ad one? It should be less susceptible to interference and/or would possibly give you audio clues to the source of interference if that's the problem.
    They tried that and got some vague signals but couldn't identify a source or even a clear direction.

    Quote Originally Posted by sar13 View Post
    Power/phone line added to T bar haul cable?
    possible. I suspect it will turn out to be something like that, or someone was fucking with them.
    Ich bitte dich nur, weck mich nicht.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    mcflattown
    Posts
    724
    Were these tests done on the 25th around 15 UT? A solar flare disrupted the ionosphere on that day according to the space weather archives. They can disrupt long-wave radio transmissions and transceivers use the same part of the EM spectrum.

  10. #10
    Hugh Conway Guest
    How close is it to the drive motor for the T-Bar? Worn motor/new control system?

    Or maybe the NSA is tapping euro-beacons in addition to phones?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vanity Fair
    Posts
    2,720
    Quote Originally Posted by theshredder View Post
    Were these tests done on the 25th around 15 UT? A solar flare disrupted the ionosphere on that day according to the space weather archives. They can disrupt long-wave radio transmissions and transceivers use the same part of the EM spectrum.
    The times and date match really, really well and that is a wonderfully freaky explanation. Cool.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    How close is it to the drive motor for the T-Bar? Worn motor/new control system?

    Or maybe the NSA is tapping euro-beacons in addition to phones?
    There is a terrain park there and they have one of those airbag things that people jump into. This has a motor which is kinda close but really should still be far away. Also depends on where the cable and the switch is, I suppose. I have heard rumors that the US military has a program working on how to target specific beacons, so they can disrupt the signal if a terrorist finds him/herself in a companion rescue situation. Perhaps they were practicing.
    Ich bitte dich nur, weck mich nicht.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    833
    Quote Originally Posted by sar13 View Post
    Power/phone line added to T bar haul cable?
    ^
    Ever since it got converted from diesil to electric my beacon (bca T2) goes haywire if you put it into search mode near the top t-bar at Glencoe.
    Remember that when doing a range test the beason is trying to amplify / detect the smallest RF signal it possibly can.
    Any small changes in the background EMI noise level could affect results.

    3 suggestions / things to consider

    1) Background EMI noise could be affecting the range result. For example an electric motor.
    2) Does each beacon have 100% battery charge ? Especially in the cold, then it could make a difference ?
    3) Frequency drift can also affect range as beacons get older : more so with older analogue models (i.e F1s) that used ceramic oscillators for the 457kHZ.
    http://beaconreviews.com/transceivers/Frequency.asp

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •