Results 51 to 75 of 1173
-
03-19-2013, 07:06 PM #51
I really hope that it is!
I think it seems like a great system. I would love to see them come out with STH options in the future too.
-
03-21-2013, 09:53 AM #52
Bumping this guy back up. We need a lot more support to see the dream become reality.
Keep the love comingLive
-
03-21-2013, 11:20 AM #53
-
03-21-2013, 11:32 AM #54
way ahead of you
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/...ystem?ref=live
link for the sake of ease!Live
-
03-21-2013, 11:34 AM #55
Good luck with your endeavor.
watch out for snakes
-
03-21-2013, 11:44 AM #56
keep the stoke high. I would like to see this become a reality as it looks like a neat idea.
only at 15k!!
-
03-23-2013, 11:09 AM #57Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- large triangle
- Posts
- 278
This awesome spam deserves to be on the front page imo.
-
03-23-2013, 12:25 PM #58
-
03-25-2013, 01:40 PM #59
$17K
Still lots of work to do. Keep the love coming folks.Live
-
03-26-2013, 06:51 AM #60
Someone with some street cred over at NS and Epic should repost over there
-
03-26-2013, 06:54 AM #61
What's the likelihood of this taking off without the kickstart? zero?
Still hoping for more backers for the boys
-
03-26-2013, 07:27 AM #62Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 395
I'll be throwing down on a boot tech fitting, and plates. Stoked. This looks amazing.
The idea of a removable heel vs. inserts is an obvious win. But, am I wrong to think that the heel lug, whether it be vibram style or plug, will still fit into a Duke/Guardian? And is the Duke/Guardian heel standard different from a FKS/other straight alpine clamps? If not, retrofitting a sliding AFD a la Duke would be the ticket. It would be the most expensive piece to engineer, but at lease that way you could use a full touring-only din standard boot in a FKS.
-
03-26-2013, 01:30 PM #63Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 214
Went with the 2 ski option including tech inserts. My only hesitation is converting from an all Sally/Plum insert setup to P18 configuration and then dealing with swopping out different brake sizes to avoid buying a bunch of new bindings. I'm hoping this crew develops a Sally template as an alternative to the Look/Rossi/Tyrolia template for those us already invested in Sally.
-
03-27-2013, 10:24 AM #64
Tough to say. Im not sure what the boys' plan is should it not make it.
We still have high hopes the kickstarter will hot 100%
Shoot me a PM, Im not entirely sure what you're asking here. The point of this system is to make dukes a thing of the past.
I dont think anyone LOVES their dukes, they merely tolerate them as a necessary evil
Hi-freaking-five. Your faith in CAST plans for the future will not go unrewarded.
Link to review of the system is HERE:
http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...Touring-SystemLive
-
03-27-2013, 04:43 PM #65
BIG NEWS:
MARKER AND SOLOMON PLATFORM UPDATE
Due to the amount of interest around the possibility of a broader range of compatible binding platforms we are making the systems for the Marker Jester and Salomon STH platforms available through Kickstarter. These two platforms are next on our list for release and the designs are nearly complete. For now we are going to stick with our initial production plans making the Marker and Salomon platforms available for the fall of 2014. This will be the delivery date for these two platforms for backers who decide to choose this option.
Due to the high cost of initial tooling associated with each individual binding platform we are first focusing our resources on the successful release of the Rossignol FKS and Head Mojo platforms. However, it is our goal to make other systems available as soon as possible. If we see enough interest in these new platforms we will look at moving production up to make these platforms available as soon as we are capable. As with the Rossignol and Head platforms, we will fulfill all Kickstarter incentives before general market purchases.
Check out our Kickstarter page or website shortly for more information and what bindings are compatible!
Thank you and Ski Hard,
-CASTLive
-
03-27-2013, 05:02 PM #66Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 472
-
03-27-2013, 05:20 PM #67
now yer talkin'!
the ease of switching brake sizes on a soloman binder, combined with the arrival (fingers crossed) of a heel slider plate, will make the notion of one alpine and one touring binder per quiver a reality.In search of the elusive artic powder weasel ...
-
03-27-2013, 05:23 PM #68
If they're planning on releasing a heel slider plate option sometime in the fall (fingers crossed), they should also put that up on the kickstarter. If the heel slider allowed you to switch between full tech and full alpine, or even if just allowed you to remove the heel for use on other skis, you'd capture a much bigger market. I'm still on the fence, but if that option was available, even if it was for a later delivery date, I'd already have put down my money.
-
03-27-2013, 06:22 PM #69
Bern:
that one is a little further out than the additional plates. Its tough to tell the future of that particular part.Live
-
03-27-2013, 09:19 PM #70
^^^ what's the possibility of making the Salomon system compatible with Dynafit Vertical/Plum toes?
there's a bunch of people out there with Verticals already; i think that this would dramatically widen the potential customer base.
super stoked, this looks like the way.In search of the elusive artic powder weasel ...
-
03-27-2013, 10:54 PM #71
I'll second this. Plums work just fine for me for touring. This tourist doesn't need an alpine binding to descend in the bc. But the capability to quickly swap touring/alpine setups between skis is very appealing. 1 alpine toe & heel. 1 tech toe & heel. Slider plates on multiple skis. 5 second swap. Hell yes. I'd throw down.
-
03-27-2013, 11:23 PM #72
I seriously........genuinely do not understand the griping about removable heel pieces. The whole point of the system is to have something that's not a shitty AT binding to ski down on. I've been skiing dynafits for 3 years now and I love them........for an AT binding. But fuck me if people are genuinely asking for an AT heel for any reason on a system that gives you a REAL binding to ski down on. Weight on the hike up? Seriously? That's an extra piece with the AT heel you don't even friggin need! But you want to carry it with you anyway?
Stoked to see the solly option! Whoohoo!Besides the comet that killed the dinosaurs nothing has destroyed a species faster than entitled white people.-ajp
-
03-28-2013, 04:47 AM #73
Agree with above. What the hell difference does it mean to take the heel off? It keeps the heavy heel on the ski and not on your boot. Where are you going to put it? How big is your backpack to now hold 2 toes and 2 heels? If you want an AT heel them just ski an AT full-time.
I think it would be a waste of their resources to fulfill a very very small subsection of folks who would want this.
-
03-28-2013, 06:39 AM #74Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- SW CO
- Posts
- 5,600
"Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers
photos
-
03-28-2013, 06:51 AM #75Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Sun Valley, ID
- Posts
- 2,547
It is so you can easily hot swap bindings between skis, not to use an AT heel ever. So you only need one set of alpine bindings, and one tech toe, ever, for your whole quiver. Inserts and plates are still quite a hassle. I like to travel with at least 2 pairs of skis and this would make it amazing for weight and packing.
Bookmarks