Page 2 of 37 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 917
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    righthere/rightnow
    Posts
    3,182
    Well sign me up for one then bitches!

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,026
    Quote Originally Posted by bobsdesk View Post
    definitely a new mount pattern in the toe. looks like the new heel piece attaches to stock boots via the screwed in metal piece of the heel? Should mean old boots can be retrofitted without redesign, right?

    I think this also begs the question: what's going to break first on this binding?
    Correct. Any boots where u can.unscrew old fitting can be retrofitted. Boots with cast fittings are SOL. So another reason to burn your old Factors

  3. #28
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by gwat View Post
    Anyone else worried about the heel spring icing up??
    that and snow packing in the lifters.

    I guess a limited release also allows containment of problems (if there are such a thing) unlike the unlimited release of previous Dynafit bindings with "issues". Still $1k to be a guinea pig? Hope that price comes down.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,026
    Quote Originally Posted by mud View Post
    Well sign me up for one then bitches!
    Thats the spirit

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    18,593
    How about a picture of the toe piece open?

    Does the toe lockout for touring like what we are used to?
    watch out for snakes

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,243
    Dynafit ought to ASAP get a pair of those to a 250 lb. 50+ touring days per season oldtimer tourist

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,026
    Quote Originally Posted by scottyb View Post
    How about a picture of the toe piece open?

    Does the toe lockout for touring like what we are used to?
    Yah. Entry is the same way. Pincers hinge open and clamp from side. Pivot mech is obviously different from pincer mech which is just those short metal levers

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,266
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    There are enough gear masturbators who will pay for latest greatest unobtanium. How to put a value on lift line cred and biggest dildo in apres placing?
    BIggest dildo?! I could swing my wank around all over the east coast!
    I demoed the TECH TALK JONG! pro model this spring and their performance was unparalleled which is good because I ski in a wedge most of the time - bendtheski, 2011

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,026
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Steve View Post
    Dynafit ought to ASAP get a pair of those to a 250 lb. 50+ touring days per season oldtimer tourist
    Dude u will ski them w TLT5s then the colours will clash

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    3,009
    Not if Dynafit also supplies him with a pair of TLT6s for testing.
    "High risers are for people with fused ankles, jongs and dudes who are too fat to see their dick or touch their toes.
    Prove me wrong."
    -I've seen black diamonds!

    throughpolarizedeyes.com

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,026
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    that and snow packing in the lifters.

    I guess a limited release also allows containment of problems (if there are such a thing) unlike the unlimited release of previous Dynafit bindings with "issues". Still $1k to be a guinea pig? Hope that price comes down.
    You know and I know never to buy first gen anything. That price has to drop. I'd imagine features will migrate to lower DIN tech1.0 offerings too

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    377
    I guess I don't get the issue with the $1,000 price tag. That's a shocking amount for a binding and maybe the shock value is the issue itself.

    Current Radicals cost $550, others 400ish. The new binding appears to eliminate the need for a second alpine set up (The Beast will at least be more resort friendly than the radicals, which do fine).

    So...you have one set up and drop $1,000 on one pair of bindings instead of what 800 or 900 on two pairs?

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,089
    Is that 935 gram weight claim valid lee?

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    the big dirty
    Posts
    726
    cool to see the next progression in touring bindings and what that will allow people to do. I'll expect nothing less than balls out zesty charging by the pilots of this binding. Huuuuuuuuuuuuck itttttttt

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,243
    Lee, I've also got a pair of One PX

    Quote Originally Posted by bobsdesk View Post
    The Beast will at least be more resort friendly than [all other tech bindings]
    . . . assuming the claim of significantly increased elasticity is accurate.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    387
    Quote Originally Posted by scottyb View Post
    The Beast 16 is available this coming winter in a limited run of 2,500 bindings, all individually numbered and delivered worldwide.

    In other words: “Limitless Skiing”.
    Something about a "limited run" of "limitless skiing" sounds strange.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    the gach
    Posts
    5,663
    Well that's just uglier than anything. Looks like it might propel you into the future.
    But Ellen kicks ass - if she had a beard it would be much more haggard. -Jer

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    sfbay
    Posts
    2,179
    Anyone with info on how to get on the list pm me. This needs a paper template, insert screw kit, a swap plate, and most importantly to be skied by me. Asap.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Aspen, Colorado
    Posts
    2,645
    I was really hoping any new heavy duty Dynafit binding would use a standard alpine heel. That way alpine makers could mould in a Dynafit toe insert in any boot and we would have a large choice of boots. The claw over the pins on the binding and the steel re-inforcing of the boot seem like a half assed solution to Dynafit's inelasticity to me

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    858
    Hard to tell but does this not have a flat tour mode? Just the first (dark grey) riser?

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Aspen, Colorado
    Posts
    2,645
    Will we be locked into a choice of Dynafit boots only due to new Patents? Any word on whether or not Dynafit will be letting other boot makers use their new system?

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    489
    First question I have, is the DIN of the toe adjustable or is it like the tlt models with some preset equivalent in ski mode?

    And I have to agree with some others, it looks ugly as hell, at least the heel piece looks like shit.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,871
    Good for the big guys, I guess, but for $1000, I'll pass. At 165lbs, I picked up a pair of speed radicals for 360$ this year to see how far I can push em. Toes unlocked, I've been sending 20'-30' cliffs at speed, and a few 10-15' to hardpack. Quite a bit of mogul days too, including gs-style-skip-a-few. Pretty impressed so far. I think most would be surprised what the 'originals' are capable of, if they actually ever gave them a shot.

    Is the 923g weight per pair, or per binding? Pretty impressive weight if per pair.

  24. #49
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by bobsdesk View Post
    I guess I don't get the issue with the $1,000 price tag. That's a shocking amount for a binding and maybe the shock value is the issue itself.

    Current Radicals cost $550, others 400ish. The new binding appears to eliminate the need for a second alpine set up (The Beast will at least be more resort friendly than the radicals, which do fine).

    So...you have one set up and drop $1,000 on one pair of bindings instead of what 800 or 900 on two pairs?
    If you have just one setup (or one class of binding) and are interested in the increased elasticity it's a $400 upgrade. don't care if the heels ugly, I never look at my heel skiing.

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,243
    Quote Originally Posted by matt View Post
    Hard to tell but does this not have a flat tour mode?
    Always a good question. Looks like it does not, although eyeballing the pics suggests that the lowest climbing bar might put the flattest touring ramp delta around 20mm?????, i.e., not that much different than flat Vert or Radical ST/FT. Not the sort of binding that would be used much for tours with long flat stretches, where the Speed Classic will continue be the tits. Also, the huge fore-aft touring ROM of TLT5, One series and Maestrales makes a flat touring mode a bit less necessary.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •