Notices

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 74
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Mini-soda
    Posts
    433

    Ski Quiver Slots/Characteristics

    So I thought this deserves it's own thread outside of the other quiver threads because I want people to share their opinions on the types/style of skis that fulfill a quiver - not the specific brand/make/model of skis themselves.

    So... What makes up your ideal quiver?

    How many skis make up an ideal quiver (all things considered - varied conditions, skiing style, cost, location, etc)? **Limit 1-3 for this conversation.*

    What classification/style of ski/binding combo for each said slot above? (Pure carve, all-mountain jib, all mountain carve, powder, touring, etc, etc) (Low Tech, AT, alpine, MFD, etc).

    Feel free to share personal info that sheds light on your choices; i.e. height, weight, location skiing, social security number, credit card number...

    Me:

    Four sets of sticks

    1 - Directional carve ski, stiff, w/ waist of 85-95mm. Alpine binders. In bounds, groomers, cruddy crud, low snow.
    2 - Touring ski, stiff charger, to excel in med depth pow to variable snow. Low tech binders. BC, sidecountry days.
    3 - Pow Day play toy. 120ish. Alpine binders. Inbounds, resort accessed/bootpack sidecountry. DELETED**
    4 - Powder masher. Something that rips big, deep and fast lines without 2nd thought. Low tech or AT ? Can't decide...

    Edit: 3 COMBOS ONLY!!
    If you disagree - or have other opinions, let them be known. Ready... Go!
    Last edited by gointhedistance; 07-30-2012 at 02:49 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    315
    My utah quiver:

    Park ski w/ alpine
    Fat playful powder ski w/ alpine
    Charging fat stiff ski w/ duke
    AT w/ tech
    Rock ski
    Work ski
    Tele ski

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ten Mile Vistas
    Posts
    3,023
    Firmer snow ski (101mm) w/alpine
    AT ski (112mm) w/tech binding
    Chargy stiff ski (112mm) w/Duke (this is my travel ski/quiver of one as well)
    Fat powder ski (126mm) w/Duke

    I haven't transitioned to Quiver Killers or Binding Freedom plates, but I could certainly get that quiver down to three if I did.
    '09/'10: 69
    '10/'11: 84
    '11/'12: 67

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    lcc
    Posts
    12,528
    Quote Originally Posted by gointhedistance View Post
    1 - Directional carve ski, stiff, w/ waist of 85-95mm. Alpine binders. In bounds, groomers, cruddy crud, low snow.
    2 - Touring ski, stiff charger, to excel in med depth pow to variable snow. Low tech binders. BC, sidecountry days.
    3 - Pow Day play toy. 120ish. Alpine binders. Inbounds, resort accessed/bootpack sidecountry.
    4 - Powder masher. Something that rips big, deep and fast lines without 2nd thought. Low tech or AT ? Can't decide...
    1. dedicated powder ski w/ alpine bindings (192cm 138mm waist, reverse/reverse)
    2. everyday inbounds ski w/ alpine bindings (192cm 115mm waist, plenty of sidecut aka 20m, tip and tail rocker)
    3. soft snow backcountry ski w/ tech bindings (190cm 120mm waist, tip rocker, stiff, straight, flat tail)
    4. early season ski (78mm waist, 15m radius, race carve style)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    791
    1. dedicated powder ski w/ alpine bindings (192cm 138mm waist, reverse/reverse)
    2. everyday inbounds ski w/ alpine bindings (192cm 115mm waist, plenty of sidecut aka 20m, tip and tail rocker)
    3. soft snow backcountry ski w/ tech bindings (190cm 120mm waist, tip rocker, stiff, straight, flat tail)
    4. early season ski (78mm waist, 15m radius, race carve style)
    A slight tweak on this for me.

    I'm an east coaster with a cabin in AK...

    1. Hard pack/ice ski (178cm 78mm waist, 15m radius race carve style)
    2. Everyday ski (184cm 99mm waist 17ish m turn radius tip and tail rocker w/ guardians and plums)
    3. Powder touring ski (192cm 115mm waist 20ish m turn radius tip and tail rocker w/ guardians and plums)
    4. Dedicated powder ski (190cm 120mm waist 46m turn radius tip and tail rocker w/ guardians)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Boulder/Breckenridge
    Posts
    1,571
    Powder faces 120mm, medium stiff, tip rocker, flat tail (Dynastar Big Dumps)
    Powder trees 115mm, tip/tail rocker, medium stiff, pintail (ON3P Billy Goats)
    Spring backcountry 99mm, tip rocker, medium stiff, flat tail (183 Bros)
    Spring inbounds 103mm, very stiff, traditional (Head 103s)
    Race carver ~70mm, stiff race GS ski (random stiff race ski bought off craigslist every ~2 years)
    Bump ski, ~85mm, medium soft (random park ski bought off craigslist every ~2 years)

    Powder charger, powder play, and spring backcountry all share AT bindings. Dukes right now, but I'm interested in the GMF system that's been prototyped this last year.

    Haven't acquired the spring backcountry ski, but it's been on my list for a long time now. It'll take a back seat this year to new boots, however.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Mini-soda
    Posts
    433
    I want to amend this thread to make it a bit more challenging to what makes the cut.

    **Limit 3 ski and binding combos.**

    Quote Originally Posted by gointhedistance View Post
    1 - Directional carve ski, stiff, w/ waist of 85-95mm. Alpine binders. In bounds, groomers, cruddy crud, low snow.
    2 - Touring ski, stiff charger, to excel in med depth pow to variable snow. Low tech binders. BC, sidecountry days.
    3 -
    4 - Powder masher. Something that rips big, deep and fast lines without 2nd thought. Low tech or AT ? Can't decide...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    14,928
    Quote Originally Posted by gointhedistance View Post
    Low tech binders
    Do you mean telemark?
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    11,780
    Rottelfela is not a breed of dog you know.
    Merde De Glace

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    14,928
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster Highmen View Post
    Rottelfela is not a breed of dog you know.
    Never trust them at the off leash area though.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    11,780
    Gimme a break.
    Merde De Glace

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Mini-soda
    Posts
    433
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWbrit View Post
    Do you mean telemark?
    Tech bindings* PLUM/Dyna's/etc

    Tele-what?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    14,928
    Quote Originally Posted by gointhedistance View Post

    Tele-what?
    The ones that are like cross country skis.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Mini-soda
    Posts
    433
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWbrit View Post
    The ones that are like cross country skis.
    I think I have seen those - they are those new bindings that all of the extreme skiers guys are wearing... Right?

    -deej
    I'm against picketing... but I don't know how to show it...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,801
    I have tried recently to have as few skis as possible in my quiver. I have been able to make a 2 ski quiver work, all with Sollyfits:

    - 115ish waist for deeper days
    - 95ish waist for shallower days and longer touring missions

    This covers pretty much everything, but I found that I was spending a lot of time swapping bindings to go touring.

    So my ideal is a 3 ski quiver, all mounted with Sollyfits:

    - 115ish waist with a powder bias but still somewhat versatile
    - 110ish waist allrounder that does pow well
    - 95ish waist for low snow and longer tours

    Given that I seem to want to tour on a fatter ski most of the time, having some overlap at the fatter end of the spectrum keeps me from having to swap bindings all the time. The 110 and 115 skis should ski differently enough that having them both makes sense, but both should be versatile enough to be used anywhere.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Reno, up on the hill
    Posts
    2,627
    10% Ski, Hard snow for the dry days:
    Nordica FireArrow EDT84 (or Kastle MX83)

    70% Ski, Mixed snow/daily driver:
    Blizzard Bonafide/Pivots

    20% Ski, Deep Snow:
    Blizzard Gunsmokes (or Nordica Helldorados)

    Thats what I have pencilled in for next year
    Click. Point. Chute.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    1,446
    I have a pair of 191 Billy Goats, and a bunch of other skis to make my TGR quiver photos look good.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,023
    Lightweight do it all ski - Lhasa FAT 191
    Fun ski, slarvey, chargy, carvy, Just plain resot shenanigans - all wood - 196 Renegades
    Deep days (like 2 feet plus of fresh) - last year was megawatts, this year Pon2oons
    I need to go to Utah.
    Utah?
    Yeah, Utah. It's wedged in between Wyoming and Nevada. You've seen pictures of it, right?

    20 days skiing in 2009/2010 (15 Powder days)
    18 days skiing in 2010/2011 (15 Powder days)
    16 days skiing in 2011/2012 (2 cat days and 11 Powder day's)
    18 days skiing in 2012/2013 (12 powder day's)

    Thanks BCSAR

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Where the climate suits my clothes.
    Posts
    2,649
    Quote Originally Posted by gointhedistance View Post
    I want to amend this thread to make it a bit more challenging to what makes the cut.

    **Limit 3 ski and binding combos.**
    This is a mistake. 3 skis does not a complete quiver make, especially when multiple binding types (alpine, burly at, tech at, tele..) are taken into consideration. Maybe three per binding type if you must, but even that will leave some spots out.. particularly for racer types who add DH, SG, GS, and SL skis into the mix.

    Just my 2 cents. Fun game, but leave it open..
    Last edited by JayPowHound; 07-30-2012 at 09:22 PM.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    3,053
    i like the n+1 rule.


    edit:

    no new snow
    a little new snow
    charger / crud crusher
    tight jibby tree pow
    crushing open face pow
    pow-pow
    In search of the elusive artic powder weasel ...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3
    At the moment I'm working with
    park
    all mountain
    crud/charger
    pow/touring

    definately room for refinement

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Mini-soda
    Posts
    433
    Quote Originally Posted by JayPowHound View Post
    This is a mistake. 3 skis does not a complete quiver make, especially when multiple binding types (alpine, burly at, tech at, tele..) are taken into consideration. Maybe three per binding type if you must, but even that will leave some spots out.. particularly for racer types who add DH, SG, GS, and SL skis into the mix.

    Just my 2 cents. Fun game, but leave it open..
    I guess that's what my goal was though - to challenge people to make tough decisions on what they would buy/ski for a winter. If you could only have 3 skis for a season, with matched bindings - what characteristics and combos would you choose?

    It's easy to say "I would have a ski for everyday of the year, no matter the conditions", but for some that is not realistic. This thread will die quickly if it is open ended in the sense that everyone will choose 5, 6, 7, 10, 15 skis to make up their 'ideal' quiver, and then there is no debate.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    1,866
    Soft snow
    Hard snow
    New snow
    No snow

    That is all I need. If it can only be three you can combine the soft snow and new snow ski....

    sent from the future using my mind powers
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    2,084
    Long tours
    Mostly hard snow (or corn)
    Mostly soft snow
    Powder

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Boulder/Breckenridge
    Posts
    1,571
    If I could only have 3:

    100mm super stiff traditional ski with Sollyfits
    100mm tip rocker ~8lb touring ski with Sollyfits
    115-120mm stiff tip/tail rocker ski with Dynadukes

    I've got my resort everyday charging ski, my long distance touring and mountaineering ski and my powder day, slackcountry and lazy backcountry (sled/road laps) ski.

    By using Sollyfits, the long distance touring ski can also be an inbounds soft snow ski for when I don't want to charge. Also, the super stiff inbounds ski can toured on with Solly bindings in the pack to ski big lines at high speeds.
    Last edited by Lindahl; 07-31-2012 at 10:45 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •