Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 51
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    2,104
    Seems like a neat idea. In a couple more years everything is going to be 11spd and a couple more after that it'll probably all be electric. The only bad thing I have heard about di2 was when a guy left his battery at home.

    Quote Originally Posted by shirk View Post
    Really hope Shimano comes out with an XT level off road worth 11spd internal gear hub that has less friction loss than the rohloff.

    It will be interesting to see what affect this new front ring, chainline and that massive 11th cog have on friction.
    The big cog isn't the issue with friction. Going smaller than 13t has a measurable decrease in efficiency because the chain bends so sharply, and chainline won't be any different than any other 1x setup or staying in the middle ring. Cassette doesn't get any wider the gears just get narrower and closer together.
    Last edited by jamal; 05-26-2012 at 01:31 AM.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    22,482
    so 32x42 is the same as what?
    always nice to have fewer moving parts, not have to deal with makeup shifts and timed shifts, etc.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    2,104
    around 22x29 or 24x32
    those are the common mtn little ring sizes right?

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    35,446
    Or find some Suntour Micro-drive 20t cranks!
    Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Planning an exit
    Posts
    5,933
    Thoughts?

    Eff it. I'm going singlespeed.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bravo Delta.
    Posts
    6,135
    Quote Originally Posted by concretejungle View Post
    Eff it. I'm going direct drive.
    FIFY...


    Quote Originally Posted by Socialist View Post
    They have socalized healthcare up in canada. The whole country is 100% full of pot smoking pro-athlete alcoholics.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    22,224
    this might be good for some riders who will always shift in the easiest gear on the rear, but stay in middle ring for the climbs. (just as their default setting) makes them think more about how steep the hill actually is, and what cadance, and gear is right for that hill, rather then "oh shit, hill, must shift down"

    thinking this, as a XC set up, on my wifes full 29er might be an answer. Have to see how brutal the price is, and if the bikes that have this as stock are more enduro, or more for the XC crowd...


  8. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,172
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    Or find some Suntour Micro-drive 20t cranks!
    I was happy with XT circa 1991, with 22/36/48 x 12-28 (7-speed) -- Avid microadapter with a Suntour microdrive chainring.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    East Maui/East Vail
    Posts
    3,236
    I am running 3 year old 2 x 10 XX and it rules. I had 1 problem and they warrantied it, the top 36 cog folded over once, a 2 tooth section. I would like and even lower gear for the very steep short climbs in Hawaii.

    38!

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    120
    I find the new chainring teeth to be the most interesting aspect of it.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    22,224
    does any small companies make a huge range 9 or 10 speed cassette now? I remember someone making a Ti one, with a huge range?


  12. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    CNJ
    Posts
    611
    Official with specs: http://www.vitalmtb.com/photos/featu...aign=spotlight

    I'm all in on the idea, but I'm not sure this is it. I was stoked on the cassette range and only 260g (thought it would end up like a big wheel weight). Then I read it takes a special hub. Suck. Also not a fan of more compatibility issues with the crank/chain. Would like to run whatever cranks I want with a bash so I don't mash my chain when I inevitably fuck up some ratcheting. Maybe you really can, and that's just SRAM marketing to get you to buy the groupo?

    The RD sounds great in concept. Would like to see some long term reviews though on how it holds up against a Shadow Plus in fighting chain slap.

  13. #38
    Finstah Guest
    The solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

    One thing that IS pretty cool about it is the derailleur's parallel design where the chain remains the same distance from the chainstay regardless of which cog in the cassette you are using.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    265
    I was driving home from the trails today and the car in front of me was a dropped '88 Civic wagon with fancy wheels, big exhaust, and aftermarket tailights. There's an analogy in there if you look for it.

    For my area, 2x systems suck unless one of your gears is a 32 or 34. Otherwise, you're constantly shifting between the two front rings. I'm with Tyrone - switching to SS solved all my problems.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Land of Brine Shrimp and Magic Underwear
    Posts
    6,783
    I think it looks good. Only thing I'm lacking on my 1X10 setup is a super granny gear for the really big days. I don't notice the lack of top end that much. Either way this system gives more of each. Realistically though, just having a 38 instead of a 36 in the back would be enough but more range prolly isn't a bad thing.
    There's nothing better than sliding down snow, and flying through the air

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    O-Town
    Posts
    2,664
    Quote Originally Posted by beaterdit View Post
    I think it looks good. Only thing I'm lacking on my 1X10 setup is a super granny gear for the really big days. I don't notice the lack of top end that much. Either way this system gives more of each. Realistically though, just having a 38 instead of a 36 in the back would be enough but more range prolly isn't a bad thing.
    I agree, not sure why anytime some new drivetrain innovation comes out everyone shuns it. The same thing happened with 10 speed, and now everyone uses it and everyone I've talked to loves it. I personally wouldn't pay for the XX version, but this will trickle down into X9 eventually and will probably be on my next bike.
    All I know is that I don't know nothin'... and that's fine.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    22,224
    nice to see all the F ring options with the 11 system, wish it was a 11-43 cassette that used a standard hub, rather then a 10-42 that needs yet another special hub


  18. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,169
    Yeah, that's where they lose me. I just got blingy hope wheels. I'm not gonna be inclined to switch from them anytime soon.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Land of Brine Shrimp and Magic Underwear
    Posts
    6,783
    I bet Hope will make some compatible conversion for their latest hubs. But yeah, why not just even 11-42, or even 11-38?
    There's nothing better than sliding down snow, and flying through the air

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sweden/b'ham
    Posts
    1,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Finstah View Post
    The solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
    its a solution to a problem that definitely exists.

    sucky thing about 29ers is the CS has to long as hell to clear the FD, relative to a 26er.

    no FD, no problem.

    of course, when you put this on your 450mm CS bike as an aftermarket part, doesnt really help, it needs to be OEM.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lebanon, NH
    Posts
    831
    Quote Originally Posted by mntlion View Post
    nice to see all the F ring options with the 11 system, wish it was a 11-43 cassette that used a standard hub, rather then a 10-42 that needs yet another special hub

    Adding 1 on the top end does not add as much as 1 on the bottom end. So to get the range of 10-42 with a current hub it would need to be 11-46. But either way, 11-42 would still be just fine for me.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,928
    Needing a new hub / freehub body is what kills it for me. Other than that it looks great. The aftermarket should really make an 11-42 with a standard cassette interface. I'd buy it.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,465
    there is no reason they cannot offer a 11-38 or 11-40 10spd setup, which would work with all existing standards, and they could crush it with, since its perfect with a 32t front ring.
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    in your second home, doing heroin
    Posts
    14,690
    32-11 for a top gear? Yuck.
    Besides the comet that killed the dinosaurs nothing has destroyed a species faster than entitled white people.-ajp

  25. #50
    adam is offline The Shred Pirate Roberts
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    3,546
    I came here for CreakyFossil's retrogrouchery, but I'm leaving without it! WTF

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •