Notices

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Republic-ish
    Posts
    267

    Canon 17-40L - Mint

    I have a mint, tack sharp copy of Canon's 17-40L F4. Comes with box, bag, hood and UV filter. Overlaps too much with what I already have.

    $625

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In my Pants!
    Posts
    11,387
    What copy?

    Does it say 'cannnnon' on it or something?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Republic-ish
    Posts
    267
    Funny.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    9,925
    it was pretty funny
    powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Republic-ish
    Posts
    267
    I'll drop it to $600 local or shipped. Best offer. Need it gone!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In my Pants!
    Posts
    11,387
    What's 'local?'

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Republic-ish
    Posts
    267
    Denver area. Also could meet up in Vail/Breck/Avon/Eagle.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Republic-ish
    Posts
    267
    Sold! Thanks for all the input Kidwoo.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In my Pants!
    Posts
    11,387
    No prob!


    I'm kind of saving up for something a little more 2.8-ish anyway.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Massivetwoshits
    Posts
    2,269
    Quote Originally Posted by kidwoo View Post
    I'm kind of saving up for something a little more 2.8-ish anyway.
    I've been thinking the same thing, but it seems like everything I read says the 17-40 is as good or in some cases better than the 16-35, which makes me balk at pulling the trigger...
    A fucking show dog with fucking papers

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Republic-ish
    Posts
    267
    I have the 16-35 and it's hands down better, at least the copies I had of each lens.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In my Pants!
    Posts
    11,387
    My 'interest in the 2.8' has everything to do with the 2.8 part and not which lens works better at every other iris setting.


    So that's good to hear gregger.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •