Thread: Gary Johnson

Originally Posted by doughboyshredder

At this point he has my vote.

Sent from my PantechP8000 using TGR Forums

Yup, me too. I don't see any significant differences between Obama and Romney.

Originally Posted by St. Jerry

Yup, me too. I don't see any significant differences between Obama and Romney.

Discuss it with DBT, he will explain the differences.

Johnson 2012!

Woh, woh, woh. Even though none of us probably agree with ALL of his views, is Johnson a candidate that we all might actually like? I think this may be a historic moment in polyass history!

aside from he's sounds like a guy who likes the outdoors and likes to ski, what makes this no-hoper that's loved by the "we hate politics" polyass fapfest any different than the other no-hopers (Paul) that the "we hate politics" loves to piss their time and money away on

My vote as well. If even (only) 80% of all that is true, he still gets my vote.

Wow. Sounds too good to be true. But I'm guardedly optimistic on this guy. He's like a moderate's Ron Paul.

Scary how much I agree with what was posted above by Wiki's political Positions..
________________

Gary Johnson 2012

Originally Posted by Hugh Conway

aside from he's sounds like a guy who likes the outdoors and likes to ski, what makes this no-hoper that's loved by the "we hate politics" polyass fapfest any different than the other no-hopers (Paul) that the "we hate politics" loves to piss their time and money away on

In my case Hugh, my vote doesn't matter. I live in a state that will go GOP unless by some miracle Obama personally invents a perpetual motion machine that runs on air and produces gold as a waste product.

Aside from that Gary Johnson's ideas make sense and he isn't a complete batshit crazy fruitloop like Ron Paul.

Gary Johnson 2012!

Originally Posted by Bunion

Aside from that Gary Johnson's ideas make sense

barely even in a vacuum

Originally Posted by Moeghoul

A. he's too libertarian on the drug issue. B. He doesn't appeal to the hoards because he isn't sufficiently pissed and spouting dumb shit on a consistent basis. To some extent, that's been Huntsman's problem as well. The mob likes the pugnacious douchebags with simpleton themes and a birther track record over any voice of reason.

As if the dem mob is any better. Barry pretty much won because he is half black, and not bush.

Fuggit - I'll vote for him too since the District will overwhelmingly vote for Obama and we're a winner-take-all locale. It'd be nice to see someone moderate get some numbers at least.

Originally Posted by Hugh Conway

barely even in a vacuum

Talking about your head again I see.........

Here in WA it would take hell freezing over for Romney to win.

How many states are actually even "in play"? Seems most are predominantly red or blue, and there are only a handful that could swing either way.

... which is why they're called the Swing States, maybe? (also sometimes referred to as the "Toss-up States")

http://www.270towin.com/

^^^I am scared DBS. Once you get away from either coast or bit to far south Obummer isn't going to win IMO. I see Obummer winning the popular vote but losing the Electoral College. Lwasuits everywhere like Bush and Gore, Mittens is elected.
To bad this Johnson dood didn't get more media attention, as I never heard of him before this thread.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tu...2/gary-johnson

Thanks for the link I missed that.

Originally Posted by hitek79

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tu...2/gary-johnson

I don't understand how anyone could watch that and not agree with more of his comments than Obama's or Romney's.

Ignoring the whole "he would be ineffective, bullshit", in what way would Obama or Romney be a better Pres than Johnson?

Originally Posted by doughboyshredder

I don't understand how anyone could watch that and not agree with more of his comments than Obama's or Romney's.

Ignoring the whole "he would be ineffective, bullshit", in what way would Obama or Romney be a better Pres than Johnson?

Boggles the mind doesn't it....

Originally Posted by doughboyshredder

I don't understand how anyone could watch that and not agree with more of his comments than Obama's or Romney's.

Ignoring the whole "he would be ineffective, bullshit", in what way would Obama or Romney be a better Pres than Johnson?

That's just it. He's better on civil liberties than Obama, and he's clearly more fiscally conservative than Romney. Why won't he win? Because he'd be a real threat to the status quo in politics. Sad really. I think he'd have a real shot at fixing crap in Washington.

Originally Posted by AustinFromSA

Why won't he win? Because he'd be a real threat to the status quo in politics. I think he'd have a real shot at fixing crap in Washington.

Those two sentences encapsulate what you, and most of the people on this thread, don't get about politics and the US.

^^^You really are one smug sob, aren't you?

Originally Posted by doughboyshredder

^^^You really are one smug sob, aren't you?

Because I think some dark horse out to destroy the status quo has much less of a chance of changing anything in the current environment? Name one "dark horse" who's really shook things up not in the Ron Paul babble sense, or the Rand Paul tantrum sense, but actually done shit.

Ross Perot

George Wallace

Hugh, people don't have to win to change things.

yeah, those Ralph Nader voters really got what they want.

democracy by serious children.

Well I guess I am one of the 9 rather than one of the 1..........

Originally Posted by Hugh Conway

Because I think some dark horse out to destroy the status quo has much less of a chance of changing anything in the current environment? Name one "dark horse" who's really shook things up not in the Ron Paul babble sense, or the Rand Paul tantrum sense, but actually done shit.

No, because you don't actually make any statement as to your opinions, all you do is type quick little smug messages as if you really think you are so much smarter than all of us, that you don't need to explain your opinions. You really come off as an arrogant ass.

Also, if you don't think that Ron Paul has had a huge effect on the Redumblican party, you really are not paying any attention to what is happening around the country.