Notices

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 51 to 57 of 57
  1. #51
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Posts
    159
    I have used skinny skins on wider skis, it works but kinda sucks for sidehilling. The fix:

    Cut a slit straight down the center of each skin, ending about 6" from the tip and tail clips. When you put the skins on, pull them apart from the center so you line up the outside edge of each half of the skin with the edge of your ski. There will be a spot in the center of the ski without skin coverage but you'll be covered around the edges. IME it works a lot better than rocking a too-skinny skin without the mod.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    4,794
    Bumping an older thread to ask a quick question, after all the threads I have read on skins today. I have never skinned, don't imagine I will be doing anything steep (out of shape meadow skipper) so I am thinking a 130 width skin to give me full coverage through the waist and tail should be adequate. Skis are 141.5-117-130.5 Your thoughts?
    Quote Originally Posted by leroy jenkins View Post
    I think you'd have an easier time understanding people if you remembered that 80% of them are fucking morons.
    That is why I like dogs, more than most people.

    In a perfect World, every dog would have a home and every home would have a dog.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bolivar/Davis, WV
    Posts
    2,708
    ^^^You will have good coverage everywhere but little bit up on the shovel with 130s.
    You are the mission Bob.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    3,261
    141.5-117-130.5 Your thoughts?
    You'd be totally fine climbing on 120 skins... probably even less if you're only skipping low angle terrain.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    6,966
    Quote Originally Posted by liv2ski View Post
    Bumping an older thread to ask a quick question, after all the threads I have read on skins today. I have never skinned, don't imagine I will be doing anything steep (out of shape meadow skipper) so I am thinking a 130 width skin to give me full coverage through the waist and tail should be adequate. Skis are 141.5-117-130.5 Your thoughts?
    the newby is the person who need w2w the most and 130 should be fine

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    4,794
    Quote Originally Posted by time2clmb View Post
    You'd be totally fine climbing on 120 skins... probably even less if you're only skipping low angle terrain.
    That's the answer I like, so I could use it with a few pairs of skis, but.......

    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    the newby is the person who need w2w the most and 130 should be fine
    I am afraid this is most likely the truth, so I ordered the 130's. Thanks guys.
    Quote Originally Posted by leroy jenkins View Post
    I think you'd have an easier time understanding people if you remembered that 80% of them are fucking morons.
    That is why I like dogs, more than most people.

    In a perfect World, every dog would have a home and every home would have a dog.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    6,966
    The $ difference between buying 130 and 120 is almost nothing so make it easy on yourself cuz you don't wana be thinking "fuck i should have got the 130's" after you have backslid into a tree well

    Just a WAG here but always owning stiffer skis and getting on some soft skis I think how soft a ski is has a bearing on how well it conforms to the snow and gives you the traction

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •