Thread: OBAMACARE- You aren't going to like this...

At age 76 when you most need it, you are not eligible for cancer treatment. It's slow-burn euthanasia, 'legal' genocide.

What Nancy Pelosi didn't want us to know until after the healthcare bill was passed.
Remember she said, "pass it and then read it!!." Here it is! Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number
THE CARE BILL HB 3200

THIS IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL. Judge Kithil of Marble Falls, TX - highlighted the most egregious pages of HB3200
Please read this........ especially the reference to pages 58 & 59

JUDGE KITHIL wrote:
** Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.

** Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.

** Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as theAssociation of Community Organizations for Reform Now - ACORN).

** Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?)

** Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees.

** Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.

** Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.

** Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years. (Death counseling..)

** Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.

HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes on to identify:

"Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. Members of Congress are already exempt from the Social Security system, and have a well-funded private plan that covers their retirement needs. If they were on our Social Security plan, I believe they would find a very quick 'fix' to make the plan financially sound for their future."
- Honorable David Kithil of Marble Falls, Texas

That should be in the Chain Email thread. maybe it already is!

The chain e-mail on urban legends, myths and total bullshit?

That one?

Originally Posted by Bunion

The chain e-mail on urban legends, myths and total bullshit?

That one?

Dime a dozen. dbt has a stack on the coffee table for reference materials.

Best to keep them in the bathroom, they work best as ass wipes.

I went to a trout hatchery once. There were billions of itty bitty trout in al these pools. Every so often these automatic feeders would chuck a bunch of ground up trout food pellets into the pools and it looked like boiling water.

mrw - you don't work at a trout hatchery, do you? Although I've gotta say - the trout just swarmed at the chow - I didn't actually see them stroking each other off like here.

I heard Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990.

Not that it matters

Originally Posted by Jer

I went to a trout hatchery once. There were billions of itty bitty trout in al these pools. Every so often these automatic feeders would chuck a bunch of ground up trout food pellets into the pools and it looked like boiling water.

mrw - you don't work at a trout hatchery, do you? Although I've gotta say - the trout just swarmed at the chow - I didn't actually see them stroking each other off like here.

"Slow ahead." I can go slow ahead. Come on down here and chum some of this shit.

In other news, mrw continues to be a weak troll.

Originally Posted by tief schnee

Not that it matters

Not that the truth matters, indeed.

Originally Posted by Jer

I went to a trout hatchery once. There were billions of itty bitty trout in al these pools. Every so often these automatic feeders would chuck a bunch of ground up trout food pellets into the pools and it looked like boiling water.

mrw - you don't work at a trout hatchery, do you? Although I've gotta say - the trout just swarmed at the chow - I didn't actually see them stroking each other off like here.

To many words
somtimes you spew

jsan

^^^^^^^^Skiballs Channelling Yoda .... And a lot of liquor ?

Candy is dandy butte licqours is kiwickers

Gotta love the outright lies approach! Pathetic, whiny and desperate... sure

Go with what you're good at I suppose.

god, worst thread ever.

Originally Posted by DasBlunt

god, worst thread ever.

They can't all be winners, god knows, I try.

http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...ight=I+predict

Originally Posted by mrw

They can't all be winners, god knows, I try.

A. God is dead.

B. Try what?

All this is fun, BUT at 76 why would you want cancer treatment? You've had a bunch of hopefully good years. At best for a real healthy 76 year old you have a 'few' 'decent' years left before the locked down drooling in an old age warehouse. Not even those if you have cancer at that point.

We all have to die sometime. If someone want's to pay themselves have at 'er but I don't see the point. There certainly is no point to waste public funds on it. Does someone think at 76 they'll bounce back from treatments like Armstrong? Most cancer treatment is pretty damn brutal.

I don't think it would be genocide unless is was one segment of people/race. Maybe you could call it 'gericide' when you stamp your little indignant feet about it.

Originally Posted by L7

All this is fun, BUT at 76 why would you want cancer treatment? You've had a bunch of hopefully good years. At best for a real healthy 76 year old you have a 'few' 'decent' years left before the locked down drooling in an old age warehouse. Not even those if you have cancer at that point.

I hope you're just trying to be ridiculous.

The idea that because you've "had a bunch of hopefully good years", you shouldn't have your treatment paid for, is exactly the problem with getting the government so deeply involved in managing health care. Where should you set that bar? Once you've hit 75% of the projected average lifespan for your demographic?

My grandmother beat leukemia 2x (around age 60, 10+ years in remission, and again around 75, with another 10 years clean), and only succombed to the disease when she was 88 after deciding, at that point, that she didn't have the strength to go through the treatments again. I have no doubt that if it'd been her first time down that path, she would've wanted/taken the treatments, and would probably still be alive. Until about 2 months before she finally lost her battle (she went quickly, which was pretty much the best-case scenario for the pain she was in), she was up and about, cooking and cleaning, visiting shut-ins from her church (she felt they had it worse than she did), and otherwise living her normal life. The joke in the family is that if the cancer hadn't taken her, she probably would've lived to be 200 or so. My grandfather turned 90 in January, and aside from a pair of bad knees that have him in a hoveround most of the time, he's still going strong.

Great doctors should, both at late life decisions and teens and 20s, make sure to not be overly evasive in any respect. Too much probing etc can always find some little thing that will not make a difference in your quality of life.

Bad doctors will scream more testing the better, but they suck the cock of the dollar and are major fucking loser tools.

Originally Posted by L7

All this is fun, BUT at 76 why would you want cancer treatment? You've had a bunch of hopefully good years. At best for a real healthy 76 year old you have a 'few' 'decent' years left before the locked down drooling in an old age warehouse. Not even those if you have cancer at that point.

We all have to die sometime. If someone want's to pay themselves have at 'er but I don't see the point. There certainly is no point to waste public funds on it. Does someone think at 76 they'll bounce back from treatments like Armstrong? Most cancer treatment is pretty damn brutal.

I don't think it would be genocide unless is was one segment of people/race. Maybe you could call it 'gericide' when you stamp your little indignant feet about it.

Do you think Roger Daltry still hopes he dies before he gets old?

Originally Posted by DasBlunt

Great doctors should, both at late life decisions and teens and 20s, make sure to not be overly evasive in any respect. Too much probing etc can always find some little thing that will not make a difference in your quality of life.

Bad doctors will scream more testing the better, but they suck the cock of the dollar and are major fucking loser tools.

By the way, I'm not arguing that nobody should ever die (or that everyone is entitled to every marvel of modern science to keep them alive at all costs). I'm merely taking issue with pushing people onto a government-run system that then sets essentially arbitrary expiration dates on when someone deserves treatment or not. My grandmother chose not to pursue further treatment, opting instead for in-home hospice care, when she realized she wasn't strong enough to go through things again. It happened that she was in her late 80's when she made that decision. She could have been in her 50's. Or 90's. The point is, it's something that should be decided by the patient, their family, and their physician.

I agree that there are doctors who will decide to test for everything, and that's not always a good thing.

Originally Posted by L7

All this is fun, BUT at 76 why would you want cancer treatment? You've had a bunch of hopefully good years. At best for a real healthy 76 year old you have a 'few' 'decent' years left before the locked down drooling in an old age warehouse. Not even those if you have cancer at that point.

We all have to die sometime. If someone want's to pay themselves have at 'er but I don't see the point. There certainly is no point to waste public funds on it. Does someone think at 76 they'll bounce back from treatments like Armstrong? Most cancer treatment is pretty damn brutal.

I don't think it would be genocide unless is was one segment of people/race. Maybe you could call it 'gericide' when you stamp your little indignant feet about it.

Wow, old and useless at 76 so just fuckin die.

My grandfather was diagnosed with cancer at 78. Aggressive treatment followed. He lived to 94 and I mean LIVED. Traveled, sailed his boat, had a great time.

The problem for the leftist scum was he was retired and not contributing to society. he was spending his money which he saved. They would rather have confiscated it upon his early death.

This is why I loathe the left.

Originally Posted by mrw

My grandfather was diagnosed with cancer at 78. Aggressive treatment followed. He lived to 94 and I mean LIVED. Traveled, sailed his boat, had a great time.
.

Medicare covered that treatment? Tea Party says let him die.