Thread: A Nobel Laureate resigns calling Global Warming Bullshit

Originally Posted by Johnny Deep

I bet the list of losers is a lot longer for those who didn't get a Nobel Prize.

I can't tell if that's a really pathetic attempt at pwning me or a brilliant and brutal self-pwnage.

wow

I don't know whether carbon emissions are changing the global climate or not, but I do know that carbon monoxide is poisonous to humans, so making less of it is good for humans.

As Armada BC suggests, it makes sense to create an atmosphere which is conducive to human health and well being, unless one is against human life.

Originally Posted by DasBlunt

When the seas rise from continued receding of the glaciers and the warming trend from the end of this ice age, you all will change your tune. No amount of CO2 sequestration will help. Global Warming is real, it just is how you approach it.

Dude, if it exists at all, it's being caused by sheep farts in New Zealand (a socialist country by the way) I can't believe a worker's paradise like New Zealand won't just put catalytic converters on the sheep anyway.

Originally Posted by hutash

... While Giaever doubts some of the conclusions, his whole snit is about semantics, and whether there in "incontrovertible" proof. He certainly did not call it Bullshit.

What he said. I think that scientists are pushed or pushing themselves to make it more certain that it is because some half brain will latch on to any thing that is not 100%. Though it’s incredibly complex. When I hear people talk about models I start to think BS myself. How many years ago was it in the year of lots of Hurricanes , GW was going to produce lots of hurricanes. Next year none. I think the proponents of GW are a bit too quick to jump on bandwagons.

Originally Posted by Rasputin

As Armada BC suggests, it makes sense to create an atmosphere which is conducive to human health and well being, unless one is against human life.

Easily the most effective way to reduce the poisoning of the Earth's atmosphere and ecosystems is to significantly reduce the human population. Misanthropy aside - are you saying that it makes more sense to create an atmosphere which is conducive to even more humans?

Originally Posted by Jer

Easily the most effective way to reduce the poisoning of the Earth's atmosphere and ecosystems is to significantly reduce the human population. Misanthropy aside - are you saying that it makes more sense to create an atmosphere which is conducive to even more humans?

That's why you are regarded by all as the smartest skier in the world. At least smartest living skier. Milton Freidman died a few years ago.

Originally Posted by Downbound Train

That's why you are regarded by all as the smartest skier in the world. At least smartest living skier. Milton Freidman died a few years ago.

Are you talking about the guy from Young Frankenstein? I didn't know he skied.

Originally Posted by Jer

Are you talking about the guy from Young Frankenstein? I didn't know he skied.

Now EVERYONE has gone after my spelling

Friedman?
Freidman?

Originally Posted by Downbound Train

Now EVERYONE has gone after my spelling

Friedman?
Freidman?

???????

Y'know - I-gore:



...Frahnk-en- steen

Originally Posted by Jer

???????

Y'know - I-gore:


...Frahnk-en- steen

Marty Feldman Ohhhhh K.
I always liked that guy. I shoulda known better.

"Wow, what knockers"

"Vhy thank you, doktor."

Originally Posted by Jer

I can't tell if that's a really pathetic attempt at pwning me or a brilliant and brutal self-pwnage.

wow

Something tells me your on the second list.

Abby someone......... Abby normal.... That's it

Originally Posted by Downbound Train

Marty Feldman Ohhhhh K.
I always liked that guy. I shoulda known better.

About a lot of things. Why stop there.

Originally Posted by Johnny Deep

Something tells me your on the second list.

My what?

Have you ever seen Young Frankenstein? It's pretty funny.

Originally Posted by Jer

My what?

Have you ever seen Young Frankenstein? It's pretty funny.

Abbey Normal?

Originally Posted by Jer

Easily the most effective way to reduce the poisoning of the Earth's atmosphere and ecosystems is to significantly reduce the human population. Misanthropy aside - are you saying that it makes more sense to create an atmosphere which is conducive to even more humans?

Like shooting fish in a barrel around here, eh?

Originally Posted by Blurred

Like shooting fish in a barrel around here, eh?

or jellyfish. It is kind of hard to tell when you hit something or not.

Originally Posted by Johnny Deep

Abbey Normal?

Yeah - somebody already posted that.

Every time you post it's like another shovelful of dirt out of the hole.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/it-i...imate-science/


March 28, 2012

The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001

Dear Charlie,

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.




The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.

As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.

For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you.

Thank you for considering this request.

Sincerely,

(Attached signatures)

See a full list of the signatures here.

Originally Posted by Downbound Train

See a full list of the gubmint workers here.

Translation: "we want our fat gubmint jobs back"

Let the free market like Spacex sort this out.

Originally Posted by Downbound Train

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/it-i...imate-science/


March 28, 2012

The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001

Dear Charlie,

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.




The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.

As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.

For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you.

Thank you for considering this request.

Sincerely,

(Attached signatures)

See a full list of the signatures here.

And people wonder why funding for NASA has been cut.......

Originally Posted by OSECS

And people wonder why funding for NASA has been cut.......

BINGO!!!!!

Notice all the denyers are X-NASA.

Originally Posted by OSECS

And people wonder why funding for NASA has been cut.......

Originally Posted by Downbound Train

BINGO!!!!!

Notice all the denyers are X-NASA.

Comical. Now the free market, trickle down, small gvt., tax cutters want to fund NASA. Why?

Originally Posted by 4matic

Comical. Now the free market, trickle down, small gvt., tax cutters want to fund NASA. Why?

Who said I wanted to fund NASA??? You are a bad reader.

Just interesting how the ONE dept that has been cut in the biggest spending administration in world history is the ONE dept that could shut down the global warning myth. Also interesting that there are 49 X-employees of NASA who see fit to sign this letter. They are X for a reason. Aren't they....