Notices

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 31 of 31
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,184
    Quote Originally Posted by 1080Rider View Post
    the downgrade came because its clear that this president doesn't have a fucking clue how to run the country.

    But, keep blaming everything on bush and the tea party, that'll restore jobs and get the country on the right track
    Obama offered a balanced approach to the debt that S&P recommends. Who shot that down?

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    6,050
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    Obama offered a balanced approach to the debt that S&P recommends. Who shot that down?
    s&p recommended at least 4T in cuts. can you tell me what the 4T in cuts were in this "obama plan"?

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,184
    Quote Originally Posted by ilikecandy View Post
    s&p recommended at least 4T in cuts. can you tell me what the 4T in cuts were in this "obama plan"?
    A revenue raise.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    6,050
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    A revenue raise.
    thats not a spending cut

    so far youre about 4T short of what S&P recommended, nice try though

    meanwhile,

    http://www.redstate.com/california_y...l-tax-revenue/

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Hoodoos
    Posts
    2,151
    S&P called for a bipartisan, "$4 trillion target long-term deficit reduction plan."

    “The $4 trillion, depending on whether it’s front-loaded or back-loaded, won’t do the trick in terms of stabilizing the US debt/GDP ratio,” he said, “but it takes you far along, and a grand bargain of that nature would signal the seriousness of policy makers.

    “$4 trillion would be a good down payment,” he added. “We thought that if policy makers could deliver the goods, it would be a very strong sign.”

    “You need an amount [of reduction] that will move the needle, and you need bipartisan support so you don’t think it will be undone.”

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    6,050
    Quote Originally Posted by Triage View Post
    S&P called for a bipartisan, "$4 trillion target long-term deficit reduction plan."

    “The $4 trillion, depending on whether it’s front-loaded or back-loaded, won’t do the trick in terms of stabilizing the US debt/GDP ratio,” he said, “but it takes you far along, and a grand bargain of that nature would signal the seriousness of policy makers.

    “$4 trillion would be a good down payment,” he added. “We thought that if policy makers could deliver the goods, it would be a very strong sign.”

    “You need an amount [of reduction] that will move the needle, and you need bipartisan support so you don’t think it will be undone.”
    Thats great.

    "Lawmakers agreed on Aug. 2 to raise the nation’s $14.3 trillion debt ceiling and put in place a plan to enforce $2.4 trillion in spending reductions over the next 10 years, less than the $4 trillion S&P had said it preferred"

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...on-accord.html

    But if you just want to show me, say, $2T in specific cuts in the "obama plan", i'd say that would suffice. ready.....go!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •