Results 26 to 31 of 31
-
08-10-2011, 10:51 AM #26
-
08-10-2011, 11:08 AM #27
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 6,050
-
08-10-2011, 11:17 AM #28
-
08-10-2011, 11:28 AM #29
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 6,050
thats not a spending cut
so far youre about 4T short of what S&P recommended, nice try though
meanwhile,
http://www.redstate.com/california_y...l-tax-revenue/
-
08-10-2011, 11:47 AM #30
S&P called for a bipartisan, "$4 trillion target long-term deficit reduction plan."
“The $4 trillion, depending on whether it’s front-loaded or back-loaded, won’t do the trick in terms of stabilizing the US debt/GDP ratio,” he said, “but it takes you far along, and a grand bargain of that nature would signal the seriousness of policy makers.
“$4 trillion would be a good down payment,” he added. “We thought that if policy makers could deliver the goods, it would be a very strong sign.”
“You need an amount [of reduction] that will move the needle, and you need bipartisan support so you don’t think it will be undone.”
-
08-10-2011, 11:51 AM #31
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 6,050
Thats great.
"Lawmakers agreed on Aug. 2 to raise the nation’s $14.3 trillion debt ceiling and put in place a plan to enforce $2.4 trillion in spending reductions over the next 10 years, less than the $4 trillion S&P had said it preferred"
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...on-accord.html
But if you just want to show me, say, $2T in specific cuts in the "obama plan", i'd say that would suffice. ready.....go!














Reply With Quote




Bookmarks