No? You don't say?? A new mostly untested product didn't perform as well as hyped???
Life is not lift served.
The part of the toe wing that holds pincer.
I think these companies should be paying TC for his beta testing.
I should have added, more specifically, the metal surrounding the hole through which the pincer is attached.
(Broke in the horizontal plane, so where once was a hole is now just a semi-circle, with the rest of the top of the wing broken off.)
Note that he'd already had essentially a full season worth of skinning & skiing on these. (Still though, not good of course -- well, good that he's been out, but not good that the binding broke...)
Did he hit something or was it a fatigue crack?
really did not want to bring this up since these things have performed ridiculously well all season on 50+ tours. But there was no impact at all just deep, albeit heavy pow, and it literally came off my foot, scary experience that I cannot repeat. So yeah dukes unless its mellow pow trees which is what I ski 90% of the time. I am hoping this is a fluke. Bad luck seems abound with me.
but to be fair the dynafits heel released on me on numerous occassions and I never had that issue with the plums, not to mention a much easier height adjustment and way more positive step in, fwiw.
Seems pretty beefy there, certainly no less so than some of the new Dynafit designs with the teardrop-shaped hole or the slot for Power Towers. How big are you, thin cover?
6 "4" 230-240lbs, used to ski way more aggressively on steeper terrain but any of my touring partners can attest that my turns were ginger. It was on a 40 degree pitch, and the guides are on some 190 rp112 hybrids.
So LeeLau,
you are saying I am not the first to snap these? maybe I should return to the ft12.
well he skied the rest of the line, did not want to rob him of the line, I glissaded down. he just hiked the the hiking trail down. Still an awesome friend and great partner, cant thank him enough.(Iv'e seen black diamonds)
edit to add: when I bought them I did not know they were first gen, when i asked I was informed they had been in europe for 4 years and were just now coming to the US, given my past experience this was of course the first question I asked.
Last edited by thin cover; 04-25-2011 at 01:29 PM.
Anyone know how many generations there are, and what the changes were in each?
How much usage prior to breakage? And when did it occur?
Plum race bindings have been around for awhile -- first season though for the Guide. (And of whom did you ask this question?)
I did some compare/contrast just now of that area with the two most recent Dynafit generations. (That area for Dynafit is the same across different models.) Hard to tell which is thicker, since the Dynafit pincer has a base that obscures much of the wing. (Ditto for the pics of the next gen Radical.)
And to toot my own horn, I definitely feel justified in my restraint earlier:
http://www.wildsnow.com/3987/plum-guide-review-binding/
"Does that mean the Guide has enhanced durability? I can immediately identify some Dynafit failure modes that would seem to be addressed on the Guide, but only time will tell whether it has its own vulnerabilities, so at this point any speculation on durability is, yes, just speculation."
So how about getting some Dynafit Speed toe fixtures and keep the Plum heel fixtures? Dynafit Speed toes are available, sold in pairs for splitboarders.
[original post edited] Just did a magnet test and confirmed that Speed/Comfort/ST/FT wings are some sort of steel -- looks like some sort of cast steel alloy. The Radical wings look to be made of similar stuff, and the lack of weight savings over the ST suggests that the Radical wings are cast steel alloy.
Are the Plum Guide wings Al alloy? If so, eyeball comparing "beefiness" of steel alloy vs. Al alloy is, of course, a meaningless exercise because steel alloy is much stronger and far less fatigue resistant for a given cross section.
Last edited by Big Steve; 04-26-2011 at 08:15 AM.
^^^^^ marshal said he is sending a new toe today. This happened Friday so great turn around.
Big steve- I thought about that. But I prefer not to take any more chances in the tech world. Like I said they performed awesomely all winter. But I think I want a more damp binding for spring conditions anyway. I am fine with dividing the two, will give me a chance to use my dukes again I think I have to surrender at this point
for the record i am personally not warrantying the bindings, and am in no position to do so. i am sending a toe from my personal stash so you can keep skiing, we (TC, plum, myself) can sort out any replacement warranty stuff as plum is able to process it.
This is why I love TGR. I lurk here for the most part, cuz I'm so busy, but it's super to cool to see people taking care of each other. Cheers, Marshal.
Obviously, I'm curious to hear about the cause of this problem with the Guides, particularly if it has occurred before...
"Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers
photos
I'm sure that if the Plums stick around long enough they will work out and fix any design weaknesses. I'm just glad there are others out there willing to put them through the paces and expose any weaknesses. In the meantime, I'm glad I have a set of Vert. ST's which have performed flawlessly all season (mostly inbounds) and another set ready for the next boards I find. We are fortunate to live in a time of plenty.
I cannot say enough about how cool marshal has been on every transaction I have had with him and there have been many. I had assumed that you spoke with plum. Thanks for this generosity. Plum emailed us both back this morning and indicated that they would replace the binding and are extremely concerned with this and want to investigate right away. So I am sending the toe piece to them.
here are some more detailed photos. No one got hurt, still skiing, all is good.
vtfree- no more tech binders, do not worry. I actually want to ski the entire line next time as opposed to the last two time where I careened down on my ass for most of it.
It's a crazy weak refrigerator magnet, but the Dynafit toes feel magnetic and the Plum toes do not. I am sad to see this. I've been railing on these bindings and now there will be a question mark in my head.
Glad you're all right.
Right, the Dynafit wings are steel and the Plum wings are CNC'ed alu. (Pincers on both are of course steel.)
I don't think that by itself has any great meaning though -- I mean, something made out of steel can be weak, and something made out of alu can be strong. So many other factors involved...
Thus far we have one documented Plum "wing" failure plus another claim (with the only details being skier weight and skis). Certainly a limited number of failures, although also a limited number of bindings in North America. Would be interested in here of any reports from Europe.
Bookmarks