Thread: separated at birth?

When you think about it, it's not far fetched. Both can read copy really, really well. Both believe in and benefit from government handouts.

They are both media darlings. Both were dragged from obscurity and elevated to positions far above their skill and intelligence by well meaning liberals.


And both of their careers after a short meteoric rise are falling like a



lawn dart.

This is a little (lot) too coherent to be coming from you. Can we get an attribution?

Originally Posted by ilikecandy

This is a little (lot) too coherent to be coming from you. Can we get an attribution?

Sorry sport but I am a font of knowledge. You are just not paying attention.

Originally Posted by mrw

And both of their careers after a short meteoric rise are falling like a lawn dart.

Checked the polls lately?

Pffft. Big deal. You think that's clever? Everyone already knows they all look alike.

Originally Posted by 4matic

Checked the polls lately?

the left wing media has kicked off a 2 year rehabilitation project to get the boy king reelected.


The timing of which has been carefully planed. After the mid term election when it is assumed that America has gone back to sleep and just when the boy king is about to do his latest State Of The Union Propaganda Show.

From here out, there will be a non stop barrage of positive bullshit culminating in a full pussy squirting orgasm from Katie Couric on election eve.

Believe none of it. The boy king's days are numbered. Ross Perot could beat him in the next election.

Originally Posted by mrw

the left wing media has kicked off a 2 year rehabilitation project to get the boy king reelected.


The timing of which has been carefully planed. After the mid term election when it is assumed that America has gone back to sleep and just when the boy king is about to do his latest State Of The Union Propaganda Show.

From here out, there will be a non stop barrage of positive bullshit culminating in a full pussy squirting orgasm from Katie Couric on election eve.

Believe none of it. The boy king's days are numbered. Ross Perot could beat him in the next election.

When the benefits of The Health Care and Education Act become transparent, especially the one allowing people to keep there kids covered till age 26 which is largely taken advatage of by wealthier individuals, the GOP is going to look really stupid. Add a Dow Industrial average at 14k and the GOP is toast. They will look really stupid trying to fight high stock prices and health care that's better. And, unless they take on entitlements, their deficit reduction rhetoric rings hollow.

I would like my kids to pay their own way before they are 26 years old, not on my or the gubberment titty. Sounds old fashion I know, but that is how I feel. Now get out there and get to work.

Originally Posted by bushman

I would like my kids to pay their own way before they are 26 years old, not on my or the gubberment titty. Sounds old fashion I know, but that is how I feel. Now get out there and get to work.

Without health care how can they get out there and get it? Doesn't providing Health coverage give freedom to work and pursue success?

Not sure how happy those people will be when their premiums and taxes go through the roof

Originally Posted by 4matic

Without health care how can they get out there and get it? Doesn't providing Health coverage give freedom to work and pursue success?

Indeed. One thing all the 21-26 year olds i have ever known have had in common - none of them were ever healthy enough to apply for a job

Originally Posted by 4matic

When the benefits of The Health Care and Education Act become transparent, especially the one allowing people to keep there kids covered till age 26 which is largely taken advatage of by wealthier individuals, the GOP is going to look really stupid. Add a Dow Industrial average at 14k and the GOP is toast. They will look really stupid trying to fight high stock prices and health care that's better. And, unless they take on entitlements, their deficit reduction rhetoric rings hollow.

Originally Posted by 4matic

Without health care how can they get out there and get it? Doesn't providing Health coverage give freedom to work and pursue success?

So if the Govt. provides health coverage it will give them freedom to work and pursue success? Does not work with welfare from what I can tell. Or will it be different, and why?

Originally Posted by 4matic

Without health care how can they get out there and get it? Doesn't providing Health coverage give freedom to work and pursue success?

^^^^^This is a scary stream of conscious thought.

Originally Posted by OSECS

^^^^^This is a scary stream of conscious thought.

How so? One injury or illness without coverage and your crippled for life financially. I know two 21 y/o that were able to stay in college because they could get back on their parents insurance.

fact is that the parents' insurance company wants the 21-26yr olds. they dilute the risk, subsidize the old and sick.

and whats with the boy king comments? I don't understand the insult, googled it and came up with Tutankhamun, but I guess Egypt is close to Kenya (both in Africa)

Originally Posted by 4matic

How so? One injury or illness without coverage and your crippled for life financially. I know two 21 y/o that were able to stay in college because they could get back on their parents insurance.

^The entitlement generation speaks.
At 26 I paying all my own bills including HI and shopping for a house.

Originally Posted by polariso

^The entitlement generation speaks.
At 26 I paying all my own bills including HI and shopping for a house.

And that was what? 30 years ago? Of course, times never change.

18 years ago actually. You certainly have your excuses down pat. How old are you if I may ask?

Originally Posted by 4matic

How so? One injury or illness without coverage and your crippled for life financially. I know two 21 y/o that were able to stay in college because they could get back on their parents insurance.

Get yourself coverage. How is it that for decade after decade people have managed to graduate college and get jobs, get healthcare ? It's still cheap while you're young isn't it ? The thought that you need a helping hand from the gov't to get a start once you're in the professional world strikes a very raw nerve with me.

As for being able to stay in college, our daughter has healthcare through her school (a state college, and it's not expensive) so that shouldn't be an issue.

Originally Posted by polariso

18 years ago actually. You certainly have your excuses down pat. How old are you if I may ask?

56y/o if it matters.

And your excuse is that it was good for you twenty years ago so it is good enough now. So ridiculous. Of course wages, access, and cost of health care have continued at the same rate. Right?

I know the conservative response. People should and will die because there isn't enough supply of health care for everyone. That's a legitimate argument but to argue that the way it is now is better is a complete croc of dung and I disagree with it

Originally Posted by OSECS

Get yourself coverage. How is it that for decade after decade people have managed to graduate college and get jobs, get healthcare ? It's still cheap while you're young isn't it ? The thought that you need a helping hand from the gov't to get a start once you're in the professional world strikes a very raw nerve with me.

As for being able to stay in college, our daughter has healthcare through her school (a state college, and it's not expensive) so that shouldn't be an issue.

Does your daughter have diabetes? Isn't getting cheap health coverage from a state institution government insurance? And, because you can afford college your daughter can get gov't insurance. Isn't that a regressive tax? What about the kid that can't afford college? Tough shit right?

Originally Posted by 4matic

56y/o if it matters.

And your excuse is that it was good for you twenty years ago so it is good enough now. So ridiculous. Of course wages, access, and cost of health care have continued at the same rate. Right?

I know the conservative response. People should and will die because there isn't enough supply of health care for everyone. That's a legitimate argument but to argue that the way it is now is better is a complete croc of dung and I disagree with it

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Medical_Treatment_and_Active_Labor_Act"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Medical_Treatment_and_Active_Labor_Act[/ame]That bullshit about people dying is rediculous and you know it!! You lefties love to spew the rhetoric!

Originally Posted by polariso

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergen...tive_Labor_ActThat bullshit about people dying is rediculous and you know it!! You lefties love to spew the rhetoric!

They convinced you. Compassionate Conservatism. Sure.


But, I'll humor you. The emergency room is the least efficient and most expensive way to ration health care.

Originally Posted by 4matic

They convinced you. Compassionate Conservatism. Sure.


But, I'll humor you. The emergency room is the least efficient and most expensive way to ration health care.

What about the people DYING.. please spin that tale again so we can all see your colors