Page 34 of 84 FirstFirst ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... LastLast
Results 826 to 850 of 2093
  1. #826
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,542
    Skied "East Timp" today. Had overly ambitious plans to ski a billygoat line that didn't really work out. Either way, fun day down south. Faceting in the upper 6-8" of snow is impressive. I wonder how nuclear Timp will be with the next storm on this now sketchy snowpack.

    We skied the lookers right slide path that empties into the parking lot at Aspen Grove. Conditions were firm snow with dust on top, ready to rip huge with new snow on it, when it comes.


    Neat location anyway, with nearly 4,000ft directly to the car, after some dinking around with cliffs, etc.


    The little summit offers great views of Timp proper, and even better views of the stunning Robert's Horn.

  2. #827
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    The bottom of LCC
    Posts
    5,750
    edit: nevermind, I guess it's true, there are a lot of dumb rednecks in the snowmobile community.
    Last edited by dfinn; 01-12-2011 at 11:41 AM.

  3. #828
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Two Thousand Leagues
    Posts
    1,014
    Well, I'm not trying to perpetuate a forum war either, but those photos were submitted to the UAC by Bill Nalli who is a UDOT forecaster. It'd be surprising to see him put his career on the line over something like a photoshopped sledneck.

    As Nalli's obs alludes to, it's been an issue for years. Here is a recent letter from the owners of the Cardiff inholdings that may shed more light on the conflict.

    And here is a map of the property boundaries in Cardiff. I believe "Dabull's" property is the one outlined in darker black and his right-of-way easement marked with red dots. If the UAC report is correct, he was traveling beyond his property line.
    Last edited by The Gnarwhale; 01-11-2011 at 08:14 PM.

  4. #829
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,542
    One more reason to not ski in the central Wasatch. Too many angry people mooning heli's, cussing at each other, bitching about dogs in skin tracks, bitching about big turns, location of skin tracks, threatening violence, and generally being miserable.

  5. #830
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    en route
    Posts
    598
    Anybody heading out touring tomorrow that I could tag along with? I'm in Sugarhouse area tonight, would prefer not to head out solo tomorrow or ride the resort. Shoot me a PM, thanks

  6. #831
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    38
    Whatta day whatta day... Mark H, Jim (Gnarwhale) and Chris taking full advantage of the lake effect... but not the lake you'd think.






  7. #832
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sandy
    Posts
    5,179
    Quote Originally Posted by dfinn View Post
    Not trying to start any kind of forum vs forum war with this and at this point and who knows if either side can be proven but according to someone posting on snowest these skiers were on private property that they were very much not welcome to be on. He is also claiming that the image is photoshopped.

    I followed snowmobile tracks that were a day or two old up Cardiff on Saturday afternoon at least a 1/2 mile past the creek crossing on the old road (the same creek crossing/road on the goggle map). Not sure how this correlates to the property boundaries, but it was waaay past the private property signs.
    When life gives you haters, make haterade.

  8. #833
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Two Thousand Leagues
    Posts
    1,014
    A couple more from Timp today, because I like pictures.

    In all her limestony glory


    Trackhead catches a ride in the tube


    And out through the swath of destruction


    NSF depth is indeed impressive as TH mentioned. Handfulls of facets, most small grained, but some 3mm+. Noticed some punchyness in shallow, sun-exposed slopes. It felt a little hollow near the ground when poked hard enough to break through the crust(s). The snowpack is loosing strength both from the top and bottom.

  9. #834
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    11,329
    Killing it Jim...some of the best images yet. Really nice stuff.

  10. #835
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,542
    Beautiful timing with the clouds.

  11. #836
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Somewhere around the west
    Posts
    2,587
    ^^

    I need to get out more.
    Johnny's only sin was dispair

  12. #837
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,542
    My observation, holy shit this is a cool line, and I'm surprised it doesn't get skied every day.

  13. #838
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    101
    pretty sure the picture of the guy getting high marked on Cardiac Ridge is not photo shopped since it was me who was getting high marked in the pic. Dealt with this same sort of shit in the northern and southern Wasatch also, oh yeah, I like the central Wasatch, but I hope everyone goes south to get the goods cause apparently that's where its at. As for me no gas money.

  14. #839
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Flavor Country
    Posts
    144

    so much terrain to explore, so little time

    looking towards Payson canyon


    snow conditions: wind damage above 9k on west aspects and the obvious faceting snow everywhere else.


    hey look, the deadliest highway in America


    no wind damage in this north facing chute.....


    just perfect light powder




    The exit was just a delight. No bushwacking or flat spots. This cool tunnel went a loooooong ways until we popped out in the neighborhoods.


    Apparently the ski bus doesn't service this area.... By the time we finished (around 2 p.m.) the snow was getting damp at 6,000 ft.


    An overview of our line. Only 2/3 of this 4500' chute is visible from here. Absolutely fantastic terrain, snow, and access.

  15. #840
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    266
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    One more reason to not ski in the central Wasatch. Too many angry people mooning heli's, cussing at each other, bitching about dogs in skin tracks, bitching about big turns, location of skin tracks, threatening violence, and generally being miserable.
    You just have to know when to go. And, some people actually seek out conflicts, which is why they go there in the first place.

  16. #841
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Not Philly
    Posts
    4,476
    Two stoopid question from a weather guy who doesn't know enough about snow science.
    With all the surface hoar and faceting the best case to refresh the snow pack is a series of smallish steady snowfalls right? Like a big dump would be a death trap no?

    Anybody going to be in LCC on the 24 is welcome to get drunk with me on my 30th bday. I'll be the jackass skiing in a suit.

  17. #842
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sandy
    Posts
    5,179
    Quote Originally Posted by lionelhutz View Post
    Two stoopid question from a weather guy who doesn't know enough about snow science.
    With all the surface hoar and faceting the best case to refresh the snow pack is a series of smallish steady snowfalls right? Like a big dump would be a death trap no?
    .
    Probably the best thing now would be a warm spell or rain to melt it. Buried surface hoar and facets will sit there until it's overloaded. Wind can blow it away, but from what I've seen it seems like a lot of garbage just sitting on top of the snow pack, so it would take a huge windstorm (and obviously wind doesn't help in sheltered spots) A big dump can overload it quickly, and you can get a natural avalanche cycle while small storms can just cover it and keep things hanging in balance until someone gets on the slope and triggers it (or you get enough small storms that add up and overload it)
    Last edited by sfotex; 01-13-2011 at 10:33 AM.
    When life gives you haters, make haterade.

  18. #843
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    11,329
    Quote Originally Posted by sfotex View Post
    Probably the best thing now would be a warm spell or rain to melt it. Buried surface hoar and facets will sit there until it's overloaded. Wind can blow it away, but from what I've seen it seems like a lot of garbage just sitting on top of the snow pack, so it would take a huge windstorm (and obviously wind doesn't help in sheltered spots) A big dump can overload it quickly, and you can get an avalanche cycle. Small storms can just cover it and keep things hanging in balance until someone gets on the slope and triggers it.

    You could also challenge trackhead to see if he can't ski all of it out before the next storm. He'll need to start making bigger turns though.

  19. #844
    RTR's Avatar
    RTR is offline Shumanitutonka Ob' Wachi
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    With the Plebes...
    Posts
    1,188
    Quote Originally Posted by sfotex View Post
    Probably the best thing now would be a warm spell or rain to melt it. Buried surface hoar and facets will sit there until it's overloaded. Wind can blow it away, but from what I've seen it seems like a lot of garbage just sitting on top of the snow pack, so it would take a huge windstorm (and obviously wind doesn't help in sheltered spots) A big dump can overload it quickly, and you can get a natural avalanche cycle while small storms can just cover it and keep things hanging in balance until someone gets on the slope and triggers it (or you get enough small storms that add up and overload it)
    Or, simply put, a temperature gradient that would create a rounding process after a storm event on top of the surface hoar layer. (Of course, the new snow would have to have sufficient moisture to facilitate the rounding).
    Click here to increase your vocabulary.

  20. #845
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Fresh Lake City
    Posts
    4,579
    skied this in the central wasatch yesterday. didn't see anyone else (one group was way in front of us but we never caught them and they took a different fork), didn't get in a fight, didn't get highmarked, had a great time even if we didn't get our objective.

    not sure the line we skied has an official name. it entered hogum fork from the saddle at the base of the coalpit headwall, north of the needle. y coulior had a nice booter all the way up, making for a record time up it for me (2 hours). snow was great a couple 3-7 inches on a firm surface.

    fun was had!


  21. #846
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Two Thousand Leagues
    Posts
    1,014
    I was shaking my head the other day at how I've been saying "It looks like January" since Halloween and now that it is January some places have a snowpack that looks a lot like November. Quite a few of the steeper places on Timp are only ~1m deep, having slid huuuge a few weeks ago. In those places the snow is weakening particularly fast.

    The weak layers that are developing seem to me likely to stick with us for a while, regardless of type of storm that comes in next. A series of weaker disturbances like the one forecasted for tonight will delicately add straw to the camel's back. A big shock to the developing weak layers - like last month's big, wet, windy storms - would be better for getting most slopes to slide during a short time period. But, with as much NFS as there is out there, I can imagine slopes avalanching repeatedly rather than just hitting the reset button once and being good to go.

    I'm no forecaster, but I think it'll probably take getting a couple feet on top of the current snow surface and then waiting a couple weeks for the avy rose to drop back into the happy little green-with-yellow-dots bullseye we've been seeing.

    In the mean time, with foot or two on top of these faceted grains we'll be more likely to see avalanches that are wider, break above the person who triggered it, don't necessarily fail with the first skier down, wrap around ridges, etc. Seems to me that the hazard will trend towards less-manageable avalanches as compared to the relatively predictable ones we've mostly seen this year.

  22. #847
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    409
    Quote Originally Posted by The Gnarwhale View Post
    I was shaking my head the other day at how I've been saying "It looks like January" since Halloween and now that it is January some places have a snowpack that looks a lot like November. Quite a few of the steeper places on Timp are only ~1m deep, having slid huuuge a few weeks ago. In those places the snow is weakening particularly fast.

    The weak layers that are developing seem to me likely to stick with us for a while, regardless of type of storm that comes in next. A series of weaker disturbances like the one forecasted for tonight will delicately add straw to the camel's back. A big shock to the developing weak layers - like last month's big, wet, windy storms - would be better for getting most slopes to slide during a short time period. But, with as much NFS as there is out there, I can imagine slopes avalanching repeatedly rather than just hitting the reset button once and being good to go.

    I'm no forecaster, but I think it'll probably take getting a couple feet on top of the current snow surface and then waiting a couple weeks for the avy rose to drop back into the happy little green-with-yellow-dots bullseye we've been seeing.

    In the mean time, with foot or two on top of these faceted grains we'll be more likely to see avalanches that are wider, break above the person who triggered it, don't necessarily fail with the first skier down, wrap around ridges, etc. Seems to me that the hazard will trend towards less-manageable avalanches as compared to the relatively predictable ones we've mostly seen this year.
    Good write up, Jim. Quoting this thing just in the hopes that people read it twice.

  23. #848
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Not Philly
    Posts
    4,476
    Quote Originally Posted by The Gnarwhale View Post
    In the mean time, with foot or two on top of these faceted grains we'll be more likely to see avalanches that are wider, break above the person who triggered it, don't necessarily fail with the first skier down, wrap around ridges, etc. Seems to me that the hazard will trend towards less-manageable avalanches as compared to the relatively predictable ones we've mostly seen this year.
    So what would normally be a great easy to ski storm of 12 inches would become a killer.

    < loads up days on alta card/>

  24. #849
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Somewhere around the west
    Posts
    2,587
    ^^^

    Good call.
    Johnny's only sin was dispair

  25. #850
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,449
    north face of claytons and hidden canyon was sweet yesterday. all the cold sucked the moisture out of the snow creating velvety conditions. some wind slab on ridges.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •