Notices

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 47
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    nh
    Posts
    7,011

    Pentagon Accused Of Launching Supervirus Attack On Iranian Nuclear Plant

    This is a great way to deal with these people. Cheap no one gets hurt lets do more of this.

    Stuxnet is the key for a very specific lock—in fact, there is only one lock in the world that it will open. The whole attack is not at all about stealing data but about manipulation of a specific industrial process at a specific moment in time. This is not generic. It is about destroying that process.
    People should learn endurance; they should learn to endure the discomforts of heat and cold, hunger and thirst; they should learn to be patient when receiving abuse and scorn; for it is the practice of endurance that quenches the fire of worldly passions which is burning up their bodies.
    --Buddha

    *))
    ((*
    *))
    ((*


    www.skiclinics.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    451
    Israeli's, not the Pentagon. Which makes it considerably less awesome.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Flatland, PA
    Posts
    2,368
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrill Hammer View Post
    Israeli's, not the Pentagon. Which makes it considerably less awesome.
    You sure, seems more like a multi-party dealio considering the security certificates.

    Bad ass code, 4 to 7 zero-day exploits is impressive.

    This may start a whole new form of e-sabre rattling if you will.
    You're gonna stand there, owning a fireworks stand, and tell me you don't have no whistling bungholes, no spleen spliters, whisker biscuits, honkey lighters, hoosker doos, hoosker donts, cherry bombs, nipsy daisers, with or without the scooter stick, or one single whistling kitty chaser?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    In Full Compliance
    Posts
    1,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuckerman View Post
    This is a great way to deal with these people. Cheap no one gets hurt lets do more of this.
    Great idea. Until it gets turned on us.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canuckistan/Sverige/Montucky
    Posts
    2,565
    Quote Originally Posted by boltonoutlaw View Post
    Great idea. Until it gets turned on us.
    Who says it has not? BTW I doubt it was fully American sponsored.
    Local Golden, BC area rep for Bluehouse Skis. Shoot me a PM if you'd like to try a pair when you're in the area!

    "He is god of snow; the one called Ullr. Son of Sif, step son of Thor. He is so fierce a bowman and ski-runner that none may contend! He is quite beautiful to look upon and has all the characteristics of a warrior. It is wise to invoke the name of Ullr in duels!"

    -The Gylfaginning

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    San Vincente de Tagua Tagua, Chile
    Posts
    4,373
    We could never be smart enough to think of that.

    Only we can do that to our pledges.

    The fucking red chinese!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Wooded enclave
    Posts
    1,577
    Quote Originally Posted by ArmadaBC View Post

    Bad ass code, 4 to 7 zero-day exploits is impressive.
    This is what impressed me most, you can't get "off the shelf" stuff that does this.

    This site might be /. 'd right now.
    http://www.debka.com/article/9050/
    I never finish anyth

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    nh
    Posts
    7,011
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrill Hammer View Post
    Israeli's, not the Pentagon. Which makes it considerably less awesome.
    I'm not so sure they have the brain power for this.
    People should learn endurance; they should learn to endure the discomforts of heat and cold, hunger and thirst; they should learn to be patient when receiving abuse and scorn; for it is the practice of endurance that quenches the fire of worldly passions which is burning up their bodies.
    --Buddha

    *))
    ((*
    *))
    ((*


    www.skiclinics.com

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    nh
    Posts
    7,011
    Quote Originally Posted by milton View Post
    This is what impressed me most, you can't get "off the shelf" stuff that does this.

    This site might be /. 'd right now.
    http://www.debka.com/article/9050/
    Outside help thats funny.


    Some of the Gizmodo comments are great.

    May I present to the Iranians the United States of America's most advanced cyber-weapon: Windows XP with IE6 and no service patches.

    Enjoy.
    Last edited by Tuckerman; 09-29-2010 at 10:34 AM.
    People should learn endurance; they should learn to endure the discomforts of heat and cold, hunger and thirst; they should learn to be patient when receiving abuse and scorn; for it is the practice of endurance that quenches the fire of worldly passions which is burning up their bodies.
    --Buddha

    *))
    ((*
    *))
    ((*


    www.skiclinics.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ventura Highway in the Sunshine
    Posts
    12,853
    However, Pentagon's spokesman Colonel David Lapan said the Department of Defense can "neither confirm nor deny" reports that it launched this attack.
    HeHeHe, the pentagon doesn't want to admit this came form some pimple faced 17 year old with bad social skills.

    I agree it is a constitutional right for Americans to be assholes...its just too bad that so many take the opportunity...
    iscariot

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    451
    No sir, Israeli's had NOTHING to do with it............


    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/wo...worm.html?_r=1

    Then again, they didn't sink the Liberty either

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Da Woods
    Posts
    26,156
    I would like to thank the Mossad for using a Comp. virus rather than a nuke. At least some people are aware of "collateral damage" and that the common Iranian cannot be sanctioned for the sins of their despots.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,525
    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/06/01...ainst-iran.xml

    WASHINGTON - From his first months in office, President Obama secretly ordered increasingly sophisticated attacks on the computer systems that run Iran's main nuclear enrichment facilities, significantly expanding America's first sustained use of cyberweapons, according to participants in the program.
    Mr. Obama decided to accelerate the attacks - begun in the Bush administration and code-named Olympic Games - even after an element of the program accidentally became public in the summer of 2010 because of a programming error that allowed it to escape Iran's Natanz plant and sent it around the world on the Internet. Computer security experts who began studying the worm, which had been developed by the United States and Israel, gave it a name: Stuxnet.
    At a tense meeting in the White House Situation Room within days of the worm's "escape," Mr. Obama, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and the director of the Central Intelligence Agency at the time, Leon E. Panetta, considered whether America's most ambitious attempt to slow the progress of Iran's nuclear efforts had been fatally compromised.
    "Should we shut this thing down?" Mr. Obama asked, according to members of the president's national security team who were in the room.
    Told it was unclear how much the Iranians knew about the code, and offered evidence that it was still causing havoc, Mr. Obama decided that the cyberattacks should proceed. In the following weeks, the Natanz plant was hit by a newer version of the computer worm, and then another after that. The last of that series of attacks, a few weeks after Stuxnet was detected around the world, temporarily took out nearly 1,000 of the 5,000 centrifuges Iran had spinning at the time to purify uranium.
    This account of the American and Israeli effort to undermine the Iranian nuclear program is based on interviews over the past 18 months with current and former American, European and Israeli officials involved in the program, as well as a range of outside experts. None would allow their names to be used because the effort remains highly classified, and parts of it continue to this day.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Flatland, PA
    Posts
    2,368
    ^ That's pretty fucking cool, I had heard that when Kapersky examined Duqu the time codes for work corresponded to those that would take off for Jewish sabbath.

    Stuxnet was like 500k the new Flame is over 20MB !! It will take a year if not more to figure out how it works but a clear pattern has emerged.

    Duqu stole blueprints, Stuxnet was written on the same platform but actively tried to disable Siemens equipment, then comes Flame which only replicates when told to and
    was apparently very successful at gathering data at all levels in the Iranian program.

    What's crazy is apparently all three of these were written in 07, which means there is probably some way cooler shit sitting on ice and that somehow a 20mb virus has remained hidden for 5 fucking years.
    You're gonna stand there, owning a fireworks stand, and tell me you don't have no whistling bungholes, no spleen spliters, whisker biscuits, honkey lighters, hoosker doos, hoosker donts, cherry bombs, nipsy daisers, with or without the scooter stick, or one single whistling kitty chaser?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    1,900
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuckerman View Post
    Some of the Gizmodo comments are great.
    May I present to the Iranians the United States of America's most advanced cyber-weapon: Windows XP with IE6 and no service patches.

    Enjoy.
    Oh damn. That had me rolling!

    I think this is awesome. Cyber-war is probably the way of the future. You can totally eff an enemy country up without dropping bombs or sending over troops. I sure hope we can avoid a war with Iran, because even though their oppressive theocratic government is horrible, the people there are really cool and very different than what the Grand Ayatollah wants us to believe.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    6,794
    Quote Originally Posted by AustinFromSA View Post
    Oh damn. That had me rolling!

    I think this is awesome. Cyber-war is probably the way of the future. You can totally eff an enemy country up without dropping bombs or sending over troops..
    why do you think somebody whose sovereignty is violated via cyberspace would only respond in kind?
    "We sit together, the mountain and I, until only the mountain remains." -Li Po

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    1,900
    Quote Originally Posted by spook View Post
    why do you think somebody whose sovereignty is violated via cyberspace would only respond in kind?
    Well, there's obviously no guarantee of that, but it's already proven to be effective, (probably) cheaper to implement, and hopefully won't get them nuked in return.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Tahorado
    Posts
    22,226
    My computer is immune to code written in arabic.
    We don't make the snow. We just make it more enjoyable.


    Git Your FKNA On!

    You Like?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    not there yet, jus' gettin' close now
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by boltonoutlaw View Post
    Great idea. Until it gets turned on us.
    Yeah. Worked great over at Fukushima, didn't it?

    Nice little way to implement the extortion, eh?
    Ski to live! Live to ski!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    North Bend, Washington
    Posts
    7,839
    Quote Originally Posted by spook View Post
    why do you think somebody whose sovereignty is violated via cyberspace would only respond in kind?
    One of the first times I have agreed with you. Wasn't it only a couple days ago that the obama admin said that a cyber attack on the us would be considered an act of war? Essentially the obama admin has been commiting acts of war illegally since day one. Disgusting. All of you cheering about this should be ashamed.

    Sent from my PantechP8000 using TGR Forums

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    4,853
    Quote Originally Posted by doughboyshredder View Post
    One of the first times I have agreed with you. Wasn't it only a couple days ago that the obama admin said that a cyber attack on the us would be considered an act of war? Essentially the obama admin has been commiting acts of war illegally since day one. Disgusting. All of you cheering about this should be ashamed.

    Sent from my PantechP8000 using TGR Forums
    Sabotaging nuclear centrifuges =/= sabotaging power grid

    Sabotaging nuclear centrifuges =/= drone strike

    Keep trying.
    Balls Deep in the 'Ho

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    6,794
    Quote Originally Posted by 13 View Post
    Sabotaging nuclear centrifuges =/= sabotaging power grid

    Sabotaging nuclear centrifuges =/= drone strike

    Keep trying.
    it is still a violation of national sovereignty no matter how clean it might be and the u.s. wouldn't take it very lightly if someone did it here.
    "We sit together, the mountain and I, until only the mountain remains." -Li Po

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    6,209
    Boo fucking hoo. What are they going to do that they aren't already doing or trying to do?

    At least it puts them a few steps further from actual nukes.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    4,853
    Quote Originally Posted by spook View Post
    it is still a violation of national sovereignty no matter how clean it might be and the u.s. wouldn't take it very lightly if someone did it here.
    Dunno about you, but I'd rather suffer the consequences of an Iranian cyberattack on the US than a nuclear attack on anyone.
    Balls Deep in the 'Ho

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    North Bend, Washington
    Posts
    7,839
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripzalot View Post
    Boo fucking hoo. What are they going to do that they aren't already doing or trying to do?

    At least it puts them a few steps further from actual nukes.
    There is no proof of them trying to do anything to start a war with us. There is proof of us trying to start a war with them. We are in the wrong.

    Sent from my PantechP8000 using TGR Forums

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •