Notices

Page 40 of 48 FirstFirst ... 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ... LastLast
Results 976 to 1,000 of 1181
  1. #976
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Naughty Korea
    Posts
    2,660
    Quote Originally Posted by ski2befree View Post
    It seems the consensus for putting Pro Tour liners in TLT5s is to go down a size from the shell size. But it also seems many people are going up a shell size from their normal size for this boot.
    Tried the 24.5s and 25s and have to say, if I would buy the boots, I would go 25. The boots just are tighter than a nuns cunt.

    With the 24.5s I def would go with a 24/24.5 intuition (aftermarket) with the 25s I could consider a 26 as with normal alpine boots. I am a 24.5 shooist.

    Just that I prolly wont risk and go with the TLT5s. Asked some some shops (italy/norwedge) and their experiences with punching and they said they had a 50/60%...
    Like 50% success and 60% failure. Failure by the materiel coming back or going over the board and streching out by the bellow piece.
    With my foot would have to do about 8-10mm streching (103mm/24.5) and risking of blowing the boots to smithenees...mmm...nope.

    The floggings will continue until morale improves.

  2. #977
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Alta/Bird
    Posts
    1,220
    Just going to push out some further support to get the bracket made to help lessen the forward lean on the boot for next season. I ride my RX130's at 12* and the difference between the the two boots is astonishing. Call me lazy but if lessening the forward lean makes traversing and riding 5* or 10* flats easier then why not.

    That's not to say, fuck, these boots are amazing on the uphill, nothing has ever compared
    If you can't dig it, you ain't got no shovel

  3. #978
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,561
    Making a DIY lean lock plate with 2 or 3 degrees less FL is easy. Yeah, I've got a vertical mill in my basement so it was easier for me. Lou on Wildsnow did it with hand tools.

  4. #979
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Fhloston Paradise
    Posts
    1,557
    I switched back and forth between my factors and the TLT5Ps and I will definitely get, if available, the forward-lean-reducing -bracket. I'm so far forward with the TLTs in comparison I feel I can't drive the skis. In powder, I could care less, but anything firm, forget it.
    "I think next week I'll be able to send some more money as I may have extra work. My friend Patty promised me a blow job"

  5. #980
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,561
    Quote Originally Posted by plugboots View Post
    I'm so far forward with the TLTs in comparison I feel I can't drive the skis.
    Yup. That very aptly describes how I felt in my stock TLT5s and why I did the DIY mod to lessen the FL.

  6. #981
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    453
    Quote Originally Posted by plugboots View Post
    I switched back and forth between my factors and the TLT5Ps and I will definitely get, if available, the forward-lean-reducing -bracket. I'm so far forward with the TLTs in comparison I feel I can't drive the skis. In powder, I could care less, but anything firm, forget it.
    Another vote to make this available. It doesn't KILL me in corn, but it could be a lot better.

  7. #982
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,561
    Federico has declared the the stock FL is perfect for 98% of TLT5 users, that 1% can use more forward lean and 1% can use less forward lean. Lots of 1%ers on TGR

  8. #983
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    125
    BigSteve, how much is a lot on TGR? 10 in total? ... well, that's much much much much less than 1% for the moment ;-)


    Quote Originally Posted by Big Steve View Post
    Federico has declared the the stock FL is perfect for 98% of TLT5 users, that 1% can use more forward lean and 1% can use less forward lean. Lots of 1%ers on TGR

  9. #984
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,561
    My personal sampling of people with TLT5 is about 25 people, each of whom I know, have met or have contacted me via e-mail. Most, i.e., >50%, complain or at least opine that the stock boot has too much forward lean. Most of that 50% have taken steps or plan to take steps to lessen the lean. Based on my sampling, I have great difficulty accepting the notion that only 1% of TLT5 owners think the stock TLT5 has too much forward lean.

    Your sampling is bigger, of course, but nonetheless it's only a sampling, i.e., you have not communicated with 100% of TLT5 owners on the issue. To my knowledge, of the 25 TLT5 owners I know, only two (me and one other) have gone public re their mods.

  10. #985
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    695
    I have wide, Fred Flintstone feet.
    I bought my TLT's at the Sport Loft here in Salt Lake. They stretched the fore-foot of the boot for me, and I have to say, it made a huge difference in comfort. Before the stretch, my feet were a combination of squeezed, hurt, and numb at the end of a long day of touring. With the stretch, the boots fit perfectly. Comfortable all day long. So, stretching can be done, but the shop needs to know what they're doing.


    Quote Originally Posted by Meathelmet View Post
    Tried the 24.5s and 25s and have to say, if I would buy the boots, I would go 25. The boots just are tighter than a nuns cunt.

    With the 24.5s I def would go with a 24/24.5 intuition (aftermarket) with the 25s I could consider a 26 as with normal alpine boots. I am a 24.5 shooist.

    Just that I prolly wont risk and go with the TLT5s. Asked some some shops (italy/norwedge) and their experiences with punching and they said they had a 50/60%...
    Like 50% success and 60% failure. Failure by the materiel coming back or going over the board and streching out by the bellow piece.
    With my foot would have to do about 8-10mm streching (103mm/24.5) and risking of blowing the boots to smithenees...mmm...nope.

  11. #986
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Steve View Post
    My personal sampling of people with TLT5 is about 25 people, each of whom I know, have met or have contacted me via e-mail. Most, i.e., >50%, complain or at least opine that the stock boot has too much forward lean. Most of that 50% have taken steps or plan to take steps to lessen the lean. Based on my sampling, I have great difficulty accepting the notion that only 1% of TLT5 owners think the stock TLT5 has too much forward lean.

    Your sampling is bigger, of course, but nonetheless it's only a sampling, i.e., you have not communicated with 100% of TLT5 owners on the issue. To my knowledge, of the 25 TLT5 owners I know, only two (me and one other) have gone public re their mods.
    I smell a poll in the works....
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    shroom put it best: "Man, you're one biased motherfucker."

  12. #987
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    South Lake Tahoe
    Posts
    2,834
    I just heard from Chris at Dyna USA that the new foward lean lock with a more upright stance will not be available as a spare part for the TLT5 next year. Can anyone confirm or deny this? Fredrico?

    Also while I am at it, could someone tell me the outside diameter of the upper section of the Broad Peak pole? I am wondering if I can put a Life Link grip with a releasable wrist strap on it like I did with my older BD ones?

  13. #988
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    South Lake Tahoe
    Posts
    2,834
    More questions: Will there be any changes to the TLT5P boot other than the new foward lean lock? Will the cuff pivot rivets be changed to prevent wear there?

  14. #989
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    2,317
    Would love to know the answer to this ^^^^^^ I am not the best DIY person and would love not to have to go to town on the boots.

    Harpo - at some point this summer lets do some climbing at the Leap as I would love to pick your brain about these boots as I intend to pick up a pair next fall. Just couldn't justify it this year given the seasonal conditions (and I bought a new road bike which gets pricey fast......)

  15. #990
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    5,273
    TLT5 vs One vs Mercury?

    Is there a comparison / chart on these?

    TLT5 only works in tech binding correct? I assume the One you can use in non tech bindings. Is the big difference between the One and TLT5 the bellows flex and extra toe buckle?

  16. #991
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,561
    Quote Originally Posted by shirk View Post
    Is the big difference between the One and TLT5 the bellows flex and extra toe buckle?
    One appears to have the same buckle configuration as Vulcan and Mercury, i.e., middle buckle anchored at the inner cuff rivet, and double-hinge upper buckle. Also, thicker Pebax shell and higher volume than TLT5, i.e. One is like Vulcan but different materials (softer, wee bit lighter, no carbon, Pebax instead of Gillewhatchamacallit).

  17. #992
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    165
    The One/Mercury/Vulcan has a higher cuff than the TLT5. Also it's more that they added an instep buckle rather than a toe buckle. Also the new boots are supposed to have more internal volume and thicker liners.

    The TLT5 is only supposed to work with tech bindings, but there are several comments in this thread about peoples' experience using them in frame bindings. The One is supposed to work in both tech bindings and frame touring bindings.

  18. #993
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    5,273
    The One / Mercury is looking like a nice upgrade from my Spirit 4's. If the One is a about the same flex or a hair stiffer it will be a do everything inbounds/touring boot for me. If it's too soft then I'll step up to the Mercury.

  19. #994
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,561
    Hard to compare any Dynafit vs. Spirit flex in terms of softness/stiffness because the flex progression is different. I skied Spirits for several years and never liked the flex (nor the boxy fit). With black tongues, the Spirit is definitely stiffer fore-aft than, say, the Zzeus, but the black tongues are like hitting a wall (no progression) and really suck. I expect the One to have ample lateral stiffness -- hell, my TLT5s have more lateral stiffness than my Spirits.

  20. #995
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    South Lake Tahoe
    Posts
    2,834
    For sure, UCL.

    Quote Originally Posted by Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer View Post
    Would love to know the answer to this ^^^^^^ I am not the best DIY person and would love not to have to go to town on the boots.

    Harpo - at some point this summer lets do some climbing at the Leap as I would love to pick your brain about these boots as I intend to pick up a pair next fall. Just couldn't justify it this year given the seasonal conditions (and I bought a new road bike which gets pricey fast......)

  21. #996
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    5,273
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Steve View Post
    Hard to compare any Dynafit vs. Spirit flex in terms of softness/stiffness because the flex progression is different. I skied Spirits for several years and never liked the flex (nor the boxy fit). With black tongues, the Spirit is definitely stiffer fore-aft than, say, the Zzeus, but the black tongues are like hitting a wall (no progression) and really suck. I expect the One to have ample lateral stiffness -- hell, my TLT5s have more lateral stiffness than my Spirits.
    Good info thanks.

  22. #997
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    jostedal
    Posts
    25
    Hi, the best boot in the world is the TLT 5, I'll just start off there and then I will say;
    I splintered the plastic semi-cuff-thingie which runs from the heel and up and makes it possible to lock the boot when the metal buckle pin goes through the cuff and the broken hinged plastic piece. I still use the boot, just taped it so I don't tear the inner boot on sharp plastic shards, and Its fine. I will of course change this broken thing when the seasons over. Its cracked from the top down and is barely hanging on without tape. I think I did it in a whitout backseat landing/crash, cause I think there was a funny sound and it wasn't my knee. The top buckle/pin popped out in this violent backseat landing and the skis didn't release. Anyone else had this problem with the boot? Again; what a fantastic boot!

  23. #998
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    453
    Question 1: Those of you using Eliminators or similar foam to reduce the forward lean: Did you put foam on the removable tongue (a la RandoSteve), or on the liner? Do you likey? The stock forward lean is fine when it's steep, annoying when it's not.

    Question 2: I have a finger to a finger-and-a-half fit on mine and want to put Intuitions in them. They're tight in a couple places even with the stock liner after 30ish days. I threw an old pair of Alpine Wraps in them the other day and they felt pretty good, but a bit short lengthwise while walking around the house. Given the pretty tight shell fit, should I go for the thinner Plug Wraps, or are the Alpines likely to be just fine?

    I'm gonna use the stock liners for long death slogs in warm weather and the wraps for everything else.
    Last edited by Andyski; 04-16-2012 at 02:38 PM.

  24. #999
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,561
    Andyski, I tried the Eliminators glued to the tongues for awhile. Didn't do much to lessen the forward lean, but it might work better for someone with different physiology. Fabricating a new lean lock bar with c. 3* less FL did the trick.

    Re liner fit, advice on the Internet has limited value, i.e., nothing replaces trial and error. FWIW, I switched to the Intuition Dream low volume liner and got quite a bit of extra room in the forefoot yet the heel holds down great. YMMV

  25. #1000
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wydaho
    Posts
    1,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Andyski View Post
    Question 1: Those of you using Eliminators or similar foam to reduce the forward lean: Did you put foam on the removable tongue (a la RandoSteve), or on the liner? Do you likey? The stock forward lean is fine when it's steep, annoying when it's not.

    Question 2: I have a finger to a finger-and-a-half fit on mine and want to put Intuitions in them. They're tight in a couple places even with the stock liner after 30ish days. I threw an old pair of Alpine Wraps in them the other day and they felt pretty good, but a bit short lengthwise while walking around the house. Given the pretty tight shell fit, should I go for the thinner Plug Wraps, or are the Alpines likely to be just fine?

    I'm gonna use the stock liners for long death slogs in warm weather and the wraps for everything else.
    If the alpine wraps feel good except for length, maybe consider locally heating at the toes to give you some more room.
    Aggressive in my own mind

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •