Results 1 to 9 of 9
07-29-2010, 05:54 PM #1
Eric Holder's Justice Dept continued...
It just never ends.
Holder puts felons over soldiers
The Justice Department obstructs military voting rights
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES - The Washington Times5:22 p.m., Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Obama Justice Department outrages never cease. The politically charged gang led by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. is more interested in helping felons vote than in helping the military to vote. Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican, has put a legislative hold on the already troubled nomination of James M. Cole to be deputy attorney general until the attorney general ensures full protection for voting rights of our military (and associated civilian personnel) stationed abroad. The senator is right to raise a ruckus.
Mr. Cornyn co-authored a 2009 law mandating that states mail absentee ballots to military voters at least 45 days before the election. Yet, as former Justice Department lawyer Eric Eversole first reported in The Washington Times last week, the department seems to be encouraging states to apply for waivers so they won't have to follow that law. More than 17,000 Americans serving overseas were denied the vote in 2008 - but, presumably because military personnel are thought to lean conservative, the liberal Obama administration is in no hurry to correct the situation.
The Justice Department is so unenthusiastic about military voting that its website still lists the old requirement for a shorter 30-day military voting window, rather than the current law mandating 45 days. On the other hand, the Justice Department has no legislative mandate whatsoever to involve itself with helping felons to vote, but its website devotes a large section - 2,314 words - to advising felons how to regain voting privileges.
As confirmed by The Washington Times last week, Justice Department official Rebecca Wertz told a Feb. 1 conference of the National Association of Secretaries of State that the new law's requirements are somehow open to interpretation. On July 28, an attendee at that conference - heretofore uninterviewed - told The Washington Times that Ms. Wertz's message was "totally undermining" the law. The earlier reports actually underplayed the effect of Ms. Wertz's comments. "It was even more pronounced at the meeting," said the source. "She undermined [the law] right in front of everybody. When I heard what she was saying, I thought: 'You've got to be kidding!' ... It was a clear reversal of roles for Justice to no longer be enforcing the law."
After looking at the minutes of that conference, Mr. Cornyn responded forcefully. His office confirmed that he did place the hold on Mr. Cole because of the military voting issue. His July 26 letter to Mr. Holder does not actually mention his hold, but its tone was strong stuff.
"The statute does not create any discretion for the Executive Branch to decide whether or not to enforce its legal requirements," the senator wrote. Ms. Wertz's comments "fly in the face of the clear statutory language, undermine the provisions in question and jeopardize the voting rights of our men and women in uniform."
The senator laid out a series of four steps he wants Mr. Holder to take to ensure that states respect the 45-day deadline, including a demand that the Justice Department provide a state-by-state accounting of compliance efforts. The hold on Mr. Cole, reportedly a personal friend of Mr. Holder, is sure to grab the attorney general's attention. Our troops deserve his respect.
© Copyright 2010 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
07-30-2010, 09:25 AM #2
Uhhhh... you do realize that the Washington Times is owned by that nutjob Reverand Sun Yung Moon, do'nt you ?
That newspaper is about as believable as those papers at the grocery store store checkout: "Space Alien Baby has Elvis' Head !"
I have no idea if what the article is saying is true. But if it is in a Moonie newspaper, the article is probably very biased.
07-30-2010, 09:46 AM #3Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
simple solution - have the troops commit felonies. done and done
07-30-2010, 09:50 AM #4
According to some on the left they are all felons."You damn colonials and your herds of tax write off dressage ponies". PNWBrit
07-30-2010, 10:30 AM #5
07-30-2010, 10:46 AM #6Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
07-30-2010, 10:54 AM #7
Don't have time to fact check but that does seem screwed up. I may be pretty centrist, leaning democrat due to republicans courting religious right, but our military most certainly deserves every possible opportunity to vote. The ones overseas are putting their ass on the line for this country, they deserve a say in how it will be led.
And encouraging felons to vote is a dumb idea as well. Those that truly want to regain privileges will find a way through legal channels without having to be encouraged. One of the privileges you give up when you do something with enough disregard for the law to be considered a felon.Education must be the answer, we've tried ignorance and it doesn't work! Wait, nevermind, when you see a liberal using science to advance an idea...grab your wallet and your freedom and run.
07-30-2010, 10:58 AM #8
Why do I feel like this is a totally political maneuver on the part of the DOJ ??
Encouraging people who willfully violated major laws to vote ?? I mean really, they were too stupid to not get caught, and now we want them helping to elect public officials ??"You damn colonials and your herds of tax write off dressage ponies". PNWBrit
07-30-2010, 03:01 PM #9
I like how DC has the inverse newspapers of NYC. The New York Times is a legitamite news organization, whereas the New York Post is a rag mag. In DC, the Washington Post is the real paper, and the Washington Times is the rag mag.
Que people shouting about how the NYT and the WP are some kind of liberal conspiracy and nothing in it is true.No longer stuck.