Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    not close enough
    Posts
    2,535

    ON3P Wrenegade -- A review

    ON3P Wrenegade -- A review
    I'll start it off by saying, If I was posed with the riddle of what ski the tasmanian devil would choose to ride on the volcanoes of mars, this may very well be it.

    The ski: 09-10 191 ON3P Wren at center mount
    191cm Wrenegade
    Tip to Tail Length: 191cm
    Dimensions: 141/113/128
    Running Length: 147cm
    Sidecut Length: 162cm
    Turn Radius: 30.5m
    Tip Rocker: 15cm x 1.5cm
    Tail Rocker: -
    Tip & Tail Length: 14.5cm
    Full Twin

    Me: 210lbs in gear/6'2''/ Fast, steep line skier. I like to go real fast.
    my quiver: 190 Praxis Backcountry, 194 Dynastar LP, 190 Gold Gotama

    The mountain: Mt. Hood Meadows, May 8th, buttery soft *fresh* slush
    *mountain was nailed w/ a foot during the week while closed, before warming into the weekend*

    Right away, I got the ski up to speed and hit off a few small natural features. The poppy-ness was surprising. The bamboo core is certainly lively and doesn't take much to give you that bit of extra boost. Its also a very damp, solid platform on landing... I though it was "stompy."

    Getting back into some steep fall lines, I opened it up, got out in front, and let it rip. The ski is soooo unbelievably solid and stable. Very quick and smooth edge to edge, this had just enough side-cut in the slushy butter. Never riding this ski before, i thought it might be a bit much for the conditions, but I was very wrong. The ski tore through the shit with ease. The 15mm tip rocker and sturdy shovel charged through heavy manky crud w/ no deflection. This was cool in itself.

    The ski was almost too stable. I mean, its a fucking rocketship w/ Cadillac comfort-ability. The profile is similar to that of a Gotama, but much, much more solid and speed friendly (I don't think you'll find its speed limit). The tail, should you need it, is certainly there for you which is good because if faced with some unexpected chunder while doing mach-50 you might want to be able to sit back and put the brakes on.

    The ski intends to have camber, though it felt relatively flat underfoot. I could definitely feel the engagement, but the feedback and responsiveness in the depth of a turn left me wanting a little more. The good thing here was the base structure and flatness allowed me to make minor side-side shifts through my feet to the ski while on a straightline or the run into a drop, without engaging the edge and it's turn radius. this was a cool feeling.

    It certainly wasn't prime tree skiing conditions, I took them into it anyway and had a ton of fun. I'm not sure I've skied trees this fast or comfortably in such variable conditions. They are definitely quick enough edge to edge and can whip around very tight spaces.

    All in all, I loved the ski. I thought it was so stable that it could use a bit more rocker up front, a tad more extreme camber to provide more responsiveness/propulsion out of turns, and a bit of tail rocker, cause why not?

    After the trial run, I came back and talked to Scott about some changes I thought would make this ski about perfect. He already had them in mind, so we'll just wait to see what he has for the 10-11 WRen. One thing is for sure, It better have some GrizzlyCorn.

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	wrenegade-graphic2.jpg 
Views:	1437 
Size:	103.2 KB 
ID:	78761  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Kodiak Island
    Posts
    2,548
    Good review

    interested in the flex

    is there any metal?

    I ski a 195 Mothership (similar geometry) currently and was interested in some comparisons

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    not close enough
    Posts
    2,535
    Thanks

    No metal

    carbon over bamboo

    Can't compare to the mothership, haven't fondled it in a while and never skied it. I'd say a pretty even 7 flex

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    rsta, Norway
    Posts
    441
    Quote Originally Posted by QuikR12 View Post
    One thing is for sure, It better have some GrizzlyCorn.
    Definately this. I Would buy them in a heartbeat.
    Nice review as well. Sounds like an awesome ski.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    5751 feet = ROX
    Posts
    4,780
    Quote Originally Posted by QuikR12 View Post
    Can't compare to the mothership, haven't fondled it in a while and never skied it. I'd say a pretty even 7 flex
    I can chime in here...

    Mothership and Wren are very similar, but the Wren is lighter, and poppier.

    The Moship is an absolute beast, as you know, and is heavier and slightly beefier.

    The Wren tip profile is fuggin' awesome, and I wish my Moships had that rocker/tip set up.

    Overall, the Wren is stiffer than a lot of skis, but not as stiff as Moships under foot...not much is.

    If you search Wrenegade reviews, I did one last year where I compared them to my 195 Moships, I think?

    Both skis kill it, but I am thinking of switching to Wrens because of the weight, swingweight, and rocker profile over my Moships (I own 185 Moships now, and have owned 195's last year).
    Music: http://soundcloud.com/powtron

    ON3P Skis
    CO Territory Rep
    www.on3pskis.com

    "You should have been here yesterday...", said everyone I know.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    5751 feet = ROX
    Posts
    4,780
    Music: http://soundcloud.com/powtron

    ON3P Skis
    CO Territory Rep
    www.on3pskis.com

    "You should have been here yesterday...", said everyone I know.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by QuikR12 View Post
    191 ON3P Wren at center mount
    Scott is gonna cringe when he sees that.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bolivar/Davis, WV
    Posts
    4,682
    OK so you are making me want Wrens again.
    You are the mission Bob.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Kodiak Island
    Posts
    2,548
    thanks PowTron

    I've got Dukes on my Motherships but never take them anymore since I've got AntiPistes with Dynafit, even on days when they would be better

    so the Wren might be the ski for me, although I <3 the Moships

    OPTIONS!!! agggh

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    2,526
    Quote Originally Posted by XavierD View Post
    Scott is gonna cringe when he sees that.
    since I know he meant recommended, not center, I am all good

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    560
    Quote Originally Posted by QuikR12 View Post
    talked to Scott about some changes I thought would make this ski about perfect. He already had them in mind
    My drinking buddies say i have a skiing problem...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    834
    The more I hear about this ski the more I want a pair, I've always wanted something like a b-squad / RC112 but can't justify the addition of a ski that I would only use a few days a season but the Wren seems like a more versatile type of ski that I would spend more time on but for my size (5 11 165lbs) still let me open it up without any issues.

    It weird how the more I look at the ON3P line up the more I want that to be my quiver

    thanks for the review
    Carry on my wayward son...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bolivar/Davis, WV
    Posts
    4,682
    Any word on Pre-season sale Iggy? I got binders that need skis and its getting harder to resist some deals.
    You are the mission Bob.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    2,526
    Quote Originally Posted by scottyb View Post
    Any word on Pre-season sale Iggy? I got binders that need skis and its getting harder to resist some deals.
    should be available sometime this week. We are just finalizing new graphics and shape changes.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    1,999
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    should be available sometime this week. We are just finalizing new graphics and shape changes.
    Sounds good.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    AKeveryday
    Posts
    590
    that was an excellent review, quikr12.
    i have a pair, and they make me wish i weighed just a little more. maybe i should ride them with an extra heavy backpack..
    they are very solid. i definitely never found a speed limit, either, but i didn't get a chance to get them up to any real speed this season. i could see that they would feel just fine at any speed. (though way more stable and easier to stop than my 185 rossi 9xs.. ) i haven't used them in any snow condition they didn't feel great in, though they sure do perform even more smoothly in deeper snow (sadly, again, didn't get the chance to test them in deep snow this year)- in the little pockets i found.
    when i first tried them, i expected to have trouble turning them quickly to get through trees, but was definitely shocked at how easy they were to turn. as long as i actually used my leg muscles instead of being lazy, they worked great! good response. i like the bamboo.
    i would agree that the tip profile is amazing.. it is what i see in my dreams when i envision the perfect ski tip..

    thanks for the review. i meant to do one, but waited too long...

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    since I know he meant recommended, not center, I am all good
    haha. Good because I cringed.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    not close enough
    Posts
    2,535
    Quote Originally Posted by powderhound100 View Post
    haha. Good because I cringed.
    haha, yea RECOMMENDED... -9 or something like that... Shit I just put on the mark and called it good. It was

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •