Notices

Page 6 of 14 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 333
  1. #126
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,101
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson View Post
    how is nobody noticing the amount of shell flex in the lower cuff where the shell has 2 pillars supporting the walk mode bar? am i the only one?
    Granted I only did a 5-minute carpet test which means little to nothing, but I didn't notice anything like that. The only sloppiness I found was in the walk mode which annoyed me, but (almost) all AT boots have a little slop like that. I am also a girly man, barely topping 160, which maybe has something to do with it?
    "It need not be fun to be fun." - Big Steve

    throughpolarizedeyes.com

  2. #127
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Hyperspace!
    Posts
    823
    Quote Originally Posted by johngenx View Post
    Yo, wendigo, are the Scarpas the same mondo size as your MR's? BSL similar? I've got a pair of Megarides now that are in great condition and are dialed in perfectly with Intuition liners, but man, I'm interested in these boots.
    Maestrale is a few mm smaller for the same size shell. Well within the adjustability of (most) dyanfits. Marshal I haven't noticed the flex you noted, but I'm not really clear on what you are talking about.

  3. #128
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    7,905
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson View Post
    how is nobody noticing the amount of shell flex in the lower cuff where the shell has 2 pillars supporting the walk mode bar? am i the only one?
    Marshal are you talking about this? I'm pinner so take that into account


  4. #129
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    scandiztan
    Posts
    78
    Think that part looks really weak..

    I want to love these guys soooo bad, but I just can't justify it..

  5. #130
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    lcc
    Posts
    12,489
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    Marshal are you talking about this? I'm pinner so take that into account

    yes lee, that is the spot, the 2 pillars on either side that support the walk mode.

    maybe people don't load the tail to olly the ski ever. but if you tried, you will get SIGNIFICANT deflection in the lower of the boot. i can get a ton of deflection (like scary amounts) just pointing my toes and lifting my heel.

    the boot fits really nice though. really dialed anatomical shape in the internal. locks your foot down exceptionally.

  6. #131
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Juxtaposition
    Posts
    4,257
    I really noticed the slop around the horizontal metal pin that runs through the lower pivot point of the steel walk-mode bar. The pin is clearly too small for the diameter of the hole and gives out a lot of movement when subtended up the full length of the cuff.

    After trying so hard to make myself buy them, I think I have given up.

    The other bigger deal breaker for me is my skinny bony calf and shins. There is a strip of silver material on the side of the liner cuff that joins the thicker high density foam of the upper liner to the softer and thinner lower density foam of the lower liner. If you feel around that silver joining material you notice a real change is thickness and harness, like a step or a ridge between the two foams. This ridge sits directly under the top buckle attachment which magnifies force directly on top of it. It burns and cramps like a mother fucker if I weight the shins. If I out my 5 year old Scarpa Matrix Intuitions in the shell, they feel like a dream.

    I don't think they are as stiff as my Radiums with intuitions wraps in them either. Pity the Intuition wraps kills the walk mode of the Radiums, particularly the rearwards movement for long strides.
    Life is not lift served.

    Weather data for Hakuba, Japan

  7. #132
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    6
    Hmmm about stiffness... What about Pegasus? It's supposed to be the PU version of Maestrale. I've had them on for about 15 minutes and they seemed a bit stiffer.
    Is PU stiffer than pebax? (I've read that pebax does not depend on temperature, PU gets harder/stiffer with lower temperatures BUT it's also more durable etc etc) Is there truly such a big difference in materials?

  8. #133
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sandy
    Posts
    4,013
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson View Post
    yes lee, that is the spot, the 2 pillars on either side that support the walk mode.

    maybe people don't load the tail to olly the ski ever. but if you tried, you will get SIGNIFICANT deflection in the lower of the boot. i can get a ton of deflection (like scary amounts) just pointing my toes and lifting my heel.

    the boot fits really nice though. really dialed anatomical shape in the internal. locks your foot down exceptionally.
    So my boots have a ridge of plastic between the two ridges in the photo that looks like it's supposed to keep the pin from flexing...
    Life is a lot like climbing: there isn't anything much more comforting than a good #2.

  9. #134
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    verbier, milan, isla de pascua
    Posts
    4,643
    Quote Originally Posted by chemist View Post
    Hmmm about stiffness... What about Pegasus? It's supposed to be the PU version of Maestrale. I've had them on for about 15 minutes and they seemed a bit stiffer.
    Is PU stiffer than pebax? (I've read that pebax does not depend on temperature, PU gets harder/stiffer with lower temperatures BUT it's also more durable etc etc) Is there truly such a big difference in materials?
    pebax is lighter and more expensive than PU. Pebax's stiffness in quite stable at different temperatures, PU gets stiffer with cold. The elastic kinetic of pebax is also less predictable than PU.
    very generally speaking, the lighter pebax is more used for AT, the stiffer PU for alpine race boots

  10. #135
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Juxtaposition
    Posts
    4,257
    Quote Originally Posted by sfotex View Post
    So my boots have a ridge of plastic between the two ridges in the photo that looks like it's supposed to keep the pin from flexing...
    The ones I have been trying on also had a lump of plastic below the pin.

    Are we all talking about the same bits of plastic though?

    I am still disappointed about the pressure point caused by the huge change in rubber thickness and hardness directly below the buckle on the outside of the cuff.
    Life is not lift served.

    Weather data for Hakuba, Japan

  11. #136
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    right here right now
    Posts
    916
    Quote Originally Posted by sfotex View Post
    So my boots have a ridge of plastic between the two ridges in the photo that looks like it's supposed to keep the pin from flexing...
    My boots have a ridge as well below the pin which seems to be absent in Lee’s pic.



    There is a little play between the pin and strap but I didn’t notice any real deflection while riding them. I'll try to ride the tails next time out and see if I can feel any significant flex.

  12. #137
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    lcc
    Posts
    12,489
    sounds like they already adressed my complaint.

    i officially need to redact it then!

  13. #138
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Juxtaposition
    Posts
    4,257
    Thanks for the pic, Mud. Does the pin fit very loosely inside the hole at the end of the metal bar? The ones I have toyed with jiggle a lot, giving perhaps 5mm of totally slack and free movement at the top of the boot shell cuff when wearing them. When in ski mode you can even hear the metal on metal as it jiggles around at the hinge giving that 5mm of loose and unsupported fore and after movement at the top of the boot. At first I thought the walk mode was broken or needed tweaking.

    I have not noticed what marshal has mentioned. Assuming I understand correctly his observation.
    Life is not lift served.

    Weather data for Hakuba, Japan

  14. #139
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    right here right now
    Posts
    916
    I noticed about 1.5 to 2 mm play where the strap and pin meet near the heel of the boot and this is probably exaggerated to 5mm at the top since it all connected. (I didn't measure just eyeballed). The play could probably be solved with a hard rubber or plastic bushing in between the heel pin and bottom of the strap.

    I haven’t noticed any slop while riding and I average about 220 to 230# with a backpack; although the majority of my time with these boots have been in powder, I would expect any deflection would be felt more on hardpack or icy conditions.

  15. #140
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    right here right now
    Posts
    916
    It seems between the two ski modes of 18 & 22 degrees the 18 has the most play.
    At 22 degrees the boot has about 1 to 2mm slack at the top of the boot shell cuff.

  16. #141
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    163
    Playing around with the pin, i can't get any loose play out of it, but i haven't gotten the chance to ski them yet.

  17. #142
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    372
    Quote Originally Posted by verbier61 View Post
    pebax is lighter and more expensive than PU. Pebax's stiffness in quite stable at different temperatures, PU gets stiffer with cold. The elastic kinetic of pebax is also less predictable than PU.
    very generally speaking, the lighter pebax is more used for AT, the stiffer PU for alpine race boots
    So this Pegasus is a stiffer version of the Maestrale? Has anyone skied in both to compare?

    Euro only? My Scarpa NA catalog shows no such boot.

  18. #143
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    verbier, milan, isla de pascua
    Posts
    4,643
    None of the people i know have tested them so far..... The weight might be significantly higher, though, and maybe the liners' quality might be different (as in the case of the cheap pu tempest vs the identical - but in pebax - thyphoon)

  19. #144
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    6
    Huh, I just noticed that Pegasus is only on Scarpa Germany website http://www.scarpa-schuhe.de/modelle-...s/pegasus.html
    The page says that it's made of pebax, but there are only few parts made of pebax, the rest is some special PU plastics. I also remembered difference from Maestrale liner: there's no intuition and there are laces in tongue area...

  20. #145
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    scandiztan
    Posts
    78
    Quote Originally Posted by chemist View Post
    Huh, I just noticed that Pegasus is only on Scarpa Germany website http://www.scarpa-schuhe.de/modelle-...s/pegasus.html
    The page says that it's made of pebax, but there are only few parts made of pebax, the rest is some special PU plastics. I also remembered difference from Maestrale liner: there's no intuition and there are laces in tongue area...
    Very interesting. It should be a tad stiffer when it's cold (since majority is PU) and.... Its about 300g heavier than the maestrale. But something is telling me that the cheaper option in this case also includes a cheaper (heavier) liner.. So, if you ad that sweet intuition into those flying horses you should have a stiffer boot to the cost of what, 200 grams?
    Haha. I'm still trying to convince my self into getting these slippers.

  21. #146
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Hyperspace!
    Posts
    823
    Did a day of lift served in these. Mine have the "third rib" like mud's photo.
    Impression: way the hell better than my old Mega-Rides. Drove a pair of 112 waist skis just fine in pow. Didn't find the tongue liner to be a problem, though I am partial to wrap liners. Plenty of lateral stiffness, fine forward stiffness for the conditions. Work great for me in soft conditions.

    Ceveat: My other boots are the afore mentioned Mega-Rides - soft in forward and lateral flex and a pair of Full Tilts - soft in forward flex, stiff(er) in lateral flex.

  22. #147
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    gone
    Posts
    934
    i have skied my maestrales a bit by now and thought id report back.
    im not a heavy guy (about 140lbs), but the boots are really soft. ive mainly toured with scarpa denali xts before, and they were noticeably stiffer. nevertheless i really like skiing the maestrales so far but i would really like to have a stiffer tongue.

    freak~[&]

  23. #148
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,101
    Took them on a hut trip this weekend. Love the fit, the skinnability, and the weight. Loved how they skied, though it was hero snow and I would've been stoked in rear-entries. I got them for pow and ski mountaineering, so they're perfect for me.

    I won't try to give a flex #, but softer than my old Factors.
    "It need not be fun to be fun." - Big Steve

    throughpolarizedeyes.com

  24. #149
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    6,793
    Am I the only one not smoking crack here? This boot is STIFF, more so than the Typhoon. No comparison. All this talk about stiffer tongues is nuts unless you're a fat fuck (or big-boned for the sensitive folk). At 180 lbs, I felt it was almost too stiff, and this coming from someone that uses the Ghost as a resort boot. The walk mode is a total wet dream and with a weight close to 6.5 lbs/pair, the Maestrale is the complete package ... never thought touring would be so effortlessly awesome.

  25. #150
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    2,054
    Anybody skied the TLT 5 Performance and the Maestrale yet? Lee? The TLT 5's really don't fit me, but if they ski as well as the Maestrales I might go on a search for a daring boot fitter.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •