Notices

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    773

    Coomba vs Coomback.

    Has anyone skied the new Coom-back ?
    And how do they compare to the original Coomba ?

    I saw the K2 marketting blurb in the autumn - which claims the additions of small rocker (2/30) actually makes the Coomback better on hard snow. With obvious soft snow benefits.

    So now fishing for a few comments from peeps who have been out using them. Especially as hard snow performance is quite important to me.

    If I get chance will defn demo the new Coomback this winter to see for myself.

    Cheers.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Everybody Knows This Is Nowhere
    Posts
    7,220
    For your home mountain you need ice skates, not Coombacks.
    Putting the "core" in corporate, one turn at a time.

    Metalmücil. We've been giving people pink ear since 2010

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    51
    ^^ not at the moment D

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    15,607
    new ones have tip rocker = more fun in just about all conditions.

    what else are you looking to know?

    Email me at dave@fatskideals.com for boot fitting questions, or stop by
    http://www.facebook.com/SoulSkiandBike in banff.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    773
    For your home mountain you need ice skates, not Coombacks.
    Ha - Normally the cool kids use crampons

    Amazingly this year there have been at least a couple of days in Scotland when powder skis wouldn't have been so daft.

    what else are you looking to know?
    Well if i knew that I wouldn't be asking (jong) questions

    Big fan of the original Coomba - However still haven't had opportunity to try out the new version. Basically wondering how much different, or better, peeps have found the new version to be. In this case as an every day ski for europe (i,e skiing variety of snow conditions over big vertical).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    15,607
    the new one is the same dimensions, weight, etc as the old, just tip rocker.

    rocker = www.evogear.com & K2.com had some good info on what that does.

    new one = more fun and less work

    Email me at dave@fatskideals.com for boot fitting questions, or stop by
    http://www.facebook.com/SoulSkiandBike in banff.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Everybody Knows This Is Nowhere
    Posts
    7,220
    Whassa matter Scottish_Skier, you don't trust me? Rocker is awesome. Even on ice.
    Putting the "core" in corporate, one turn at a time.

    Metalmücil. We've been giving people pink ear since 2010

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    773
    I trust you hop - just dont get to ski as much deep powder as you

    Edit : I understand the differences between the 2 skis (same dimensions but new coomback has addition of subtle 30/2 rocker). Just fishing for a few comments now peeps have had a couple months to go out and ski the Coomback. It is a ski I really want to try out

    Thanks for the link MtLion.

    http://www.evogear.com/skis/k2-coomback-2010.aspx
    Last edited by Scottish_Skier; 01-16-2010 at 10:55 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Hood River, OR
    Posts
    644
    Try searching for Anti Piste vs. Coomba threads. From what I've heard the Coomback is basically the same rocker profile as last years Anti Piste.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    669
    Any more thoughts on this? I like my Anti Piste/Coombacks so much, I'm thinking of buying a pair for the resort but the Coomba's are quite a bit cheaper.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    15,607
    pay for the rocker. I've had both, and makes a nice ski better.

    Email me at dave@fatskideals.com for boot fitting questions, or stop by
    http://www.facebook.com/SoulSkiandBike in banff.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    773
    wow - old thread...
    for resort skiing I reckon Side Stash or Hardside are now better options.
    mainly because of the proper sidewalls and stiffer flex.

    apart from addition of rocker the Coomback also seems a smidge softer than original 2008 Coomba.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    verbier, milan, isla de pascua
    Posts
    4,643
    having skied recently the hardside and the coomback, i'd say that - if weight is not an issue - the hardside is more versatile

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •