Results 451 to 475 of 519
Thread: Solitude Expansion...
-
12-18-2009, 08:34 PM #451
-
12-18-2009, 09:49 PM #452
Yeti posts many words in this thread.
Many are right on.
I live far away and don't "earn my turns."
Just peeing on the rock -- as it were.
-
12-18-2009, 10:04 PM #453
Oh right; I'm from NJ so that must mean I haven't ever skied in the Wasatch. Wow, am I b-u-s-t-e-d!
Except maybe the year I bummed working at the Cliff Lodge. Or the year I bummed working at the EE. And we went over to Deer Valley to go XC skiing because DV wasn't even built then. So go ahead and tell me that I don't know what it's like to see the BC become a resort.
But, you MUST be right, all knowing Maggot. I'm from the Garden State. I haven't been there in a long time. Oh wait. Wait a minute. Was that Solitude I was at last Saturday and Sunday skiing all f'in day and watching folks flounder around in the quicksand all day Sunday? Or maybe the week before when I shucked the kind-of-east-like groomers on the lower mountain? Sandwiched around a hike last Friday up Mill D and definitely NOT ready for skiing (although I did see some XC and snowshoe tracks in the crunch.)
Yeah, it sucks living in the EC (since 1980 for f*cks sake), so I try to get there at least once a year during the winter. Now, I'm aiming for 3 trips a winter.
Oh, and yes, I do AT. Not well, frankly, because I just don't have the lungs for much uphill. I'm sure not as good as you hard core Gnarly Gnar Gnars.
-
12-18-2009, 10:25 PM #454Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 471
-
12-18-2009, 10:27 PM #455
-
12-18-2009, 11:05 PM #456
-
12-18-2009, 11:45 PM #457
-
12-19-2009, 02:02 AM #458Hugh Conway Guest
-
12-19-2009, 02:24 AM #459
-
12-19-2009, 03:03 AM #460Hugh Conway Guest
-
12-19-2009, 08:35 AM #461
Well, I'd rather keep public land public, than have Solitude, a private company, bastardize it for their own profits. How would you feel about it if Dick Cheney was going to drill for oil in your local playground, but by doing so, you wouldn't be able to use it anymore?
It's funny to watch posters in this thread with their fragile egos use terms like Gnar Gnar, elitist, extremo gnarcore, etc. Please try not to get your vagina all bruised up over it.
-
12-19-2009, 11:13 AM #462
Bottom line: They're all just jealous because they are too lazy and too lacking in imagination to ever do anything but ride a lift to their mostly shitty skiing. I know it also sucks to see beautiful tracks and sick lines in the mountains beyond the resort when you're skiing chunder fuck crud with a bunch of sheeple by noon. Sucks for them, I know it must get pretty boring when those are the limitations you insist on placing on yourself.
"The skis just popped me up out of the snow and I went screaming down the hill on a high better than any heroin junkie." She Ra
-
12-19-2009, 11:19 AM #463
Wow, where to begin?
If I was in the USFS, I'd think the attitudes here don't make BC skiers even sound worthy of preserving their stashes. When did touring skiers become such pricks? FWIW, I agree with John Muir's view: "Not blind opposition to progress,but opposition to blind progress..." You can interpret that however you want to, but I think it's relevant here.
Goat: You tagged me butthurt, then said the aggression will not stand. WTF?
JTrue: I'm glad you got the answer you were hoping for. Whatever that means. BTW, I'm originally from southern California.
Trackhead: I've been up into the trees on the shadow (east) side of SF and the open bowl/chutes (west) on whatever day it made sense, so I don't know whether things get tracked out on Saturday or what. (I go out to Utah on vacations, remember?) Shit, the times I've been into SF, there were SOME tracks but I wouldn't say it was chopped up. Maybe we have different definitions of tracked out. I don't think even Honeycomb Canyon gets tracked out most of the time, even with the access from the summit and the return lift. I never have problems finding fresh or spoon-able tracks in there long after a storm if I traverse out far enough.
WRA: I see what you're driving for. Anyway, I don't remember a groundskeeper, just that we parked at the top of PC and skied in. It wasn't gnar, it was just fun. (If you're trying to out me, here's some trivia: I lived part of that winter in one of 3 or 4 houses just north of the main PC parking lot and almost next to the miner's hostel. One of the houses was actually a bar. Same era as you're talking about?)
Have a nice day. Oh, and save the whales.
-
12-19-2009, 12:43 PM #464
bl2000,
It's PUBLIC land, not private land. Why wouldn't we be upset at losing the opportunity to use our PUBLIC land to what is a PRIVATE company. If Solitude gets lifts in SF, the public loses. We can't ski there anymore, Utah ski areas on public land don't allow uphill traffic, and I don't want to skin at a place that used to be free of lifts.
PUBLIC LAND becoming privatized. That's the issue.
-
12-19-2009, 02:49 PM #465
That's a fair point. And, shit, I understand people being upset. That's a lot different than the personal attacks for people having differences of opinions.
Personally (and we're all speaking from our own biases, right?), I would rather continue to have public access plus allow a lift go in. That's all. I'd want to be able to take advantage of both opportunities. An agreement could be made between the USFS and Solitude to allow that. And I really don't believe it would get tracked out, based on what my own eyes and feet tell me about Solitude. Alta gets tracked out. Snowbird gets tracked out. IMO Solitude doesn't get tracked out. Which is a large part of the reason why I like to ski there.
-
12-19-2009, 03:28 PM #466
If Solitude gets a lift there, it will be on their terms, there will be no clause for ski touring. I don't know anybody I ski with that would want to tour there anymore if a lift went in. Most of the people I tour with do so to make an effort to see less people, and doing so in a drainage with a lift doesn't work.
When is enough, enough?
-
12-19-2009, 04:13 PM #467
-
12-19-2009, 04:40 PM #468
-
12-19-2009, 08:48 PM #469
Yes, because they bought the land.
LCC has 2 f'in HUGE ski areas covered top to bottom with runs (closer to SLC than S'tude, by the way), they've expanded, most recently into Mineral Basin, built a tunnel to get there, have a tram tower you can see from the valley (and, shit, the front side of the Bird was BC less than 40 years ago), blah, blah, blah.
It sounds to me like a lot of folks here are singling out BCC for the only canyon NOT allowed to have ski area expansion. Like I said earlier in this thread, put the lift in, let S'tude do avy control, watch SF get - maybe - 10-20% tracked out (like Honeycomb does now) and go do AT there also.
As a final insult, although it will still be considered "public land" unless you are paying and going downhill, you are not allowed. No winter hikers, campers, picnickers, skiers, sightseers, etc..
-
12-19-2009, 08:54 PM #470
Utah, as a state, does not allow uphill traffic at ski areas.
And I really don't believe it would get tracked out, based on what my own eyes and feet tell me about Solitude. Alta gets tracked out. Snowbird gets tracked out. IMO Solitude doesn't get tracked out. Which is a large part of the reason why I like to ski there.
-
12-19-2009, 11:29 PM #471
Don't cry Mr. Native American Bro.
A dwellng has been erected on your land and is serving as the headquarters for SAVE OUR FRESHIES a coalition of gnar gnar slaying powder fiends
If your in the silly fork hood stop on by for a peace pipe session
Skiing pretty well back there too
"When the child was a child it waited patiently for the first snow and it still does"- Van "The Man" Morrison
"I find I have already had my reward, in the doing of the thing" - Buzz Holmstrom
"THIS IS WHAT WE DO"-AML -ski on in eternal peace
"I have posted in here but haven't read it carefully with my trusty PoliAsshat antenna on."-DipshitDanno
-
12-20-2009, 02:01 PM #472
I'm sympathetic with your points--and I am REALLY sympathetic with the idea of preserving wilderness for future generations. I'm just also sympathetic with having some sweet terrain also be lift served and having professional avy control.
I still contend that Honeycomb Return didn't ruin HC. It's probably the lowest impact chair I've ever seen.
A deal could get made where Solitude would have to agree to provide free uphill public access in return for leasing (not necessarily owning) the federal land and putting in a lift. Utah can amend the law (if it's even so black and white, especially with respect to federal land). My point is that a compromise could be made. And Utah can amend the law generally or specifically to suit this situation. That's what legislators get elected and paid to do.
As far as greed, is the position of people who only want access by self-propulsion any less out of self-interest? Greed doesn't only relate to $$$. Moby Thesaurus words for "greed":
acedia, acquisitiveness, anger, autism, avarice, avariciousness,
avaritia, avidity, avidness, careerism, covetousness, crapulence,
crapulency, craving, cupidity, deadly sin, edacity, ego trip,
egotism, envy, frenzy of desire, fury of desire, gluttonousness,
gluttony, grasping, graspingness, greediness, gula, gulosity,
hoggishness, hyperphagia, incontinence, individualism,
inordinate desire, insatiability, insatiable desire, intemperance,
intemperateness, interest, invidia, ira, itching palm, lust,
luxuria, meanness, miserliness, narcissism, niggardliness,
omnivorousness, overeating, overgreediness, overindulgence,
parsimony, penny-pinching, penuriousness, personal aims,
personal ambition, personal desires, personalism, piggishness,
polyphagia, possessiveness, pride, privatism, rapaciousness,
rapacity, ravenousness, remoteness, self-absorption,
self-admiration, self-advancement, self-centeredness,
self-consideration, self-containment, self-devotion, self-esteem,
self-indulgence, self-interest, self-interestedness, self-jealousy,
self-occupation, self-pleasing, self-seeking, self-serving,
self-solicitude, self-sufficiency, selfishness, selfism, sloth,
sordidness, stinginess, superbia, swinish gluttony, swinishness,
voraciousness, voracity, wolfishness, wrath, yearning
WTF is crapulence? Or gula?
-
12-20-2009, 03:27 PM #473
That's because you are seeing it with resort skiers eyes. If you put a golf course, dirt bike track, shooting range or something else in there I'm sure many user groups would consider that a huge improvement over empty land. And, the HC lift and return road certainly impacted free public access to the area during the winter.
A deal could get made where Solitude would have to agree to provide free uphill public access in return for leasing (not necessarily owning) the federal land and putting in a lift. Utah can amend the law (if it's even so black and white, especially with respect to federal land). My point is that a compromise could be made. And Utah can amend the law generally or specifically to suit this situation. That's what legislators get elected and paid to do.
As far as greed, is the position of people who only want access by self-propulsion any less out of self-interest?
-
12-20-2009, 04:52 PM #474
Professional avy control isn't needed, and is often useless and unreliable. I don't know about you, but I don't need Solitude or Wasatch Powderbird "professionals" bombing shit for me to make it safe.
See the photo, see the bomb hole, no avy until later. WPG has also bombed stuff that slid on their clients later. Remember the tragic Snowbird fatality last year in professionally controlled terrain? How about the Park City fatality in controlled terrain?
-
12-21-2009, 02:20 AM #475
Bookmarks