Results 1 to 25 of 60
-
10-29-2009, 01:27 PM #1
If your wife/girlfriend/SO wants to do Girl/Girl Porn, would you be okay with it?
Hypothetically speaking of course.
You both know the other chick, and its strictly a business venture.
Yes or no?Last edited by G; 10-31-2009 at 01:00 AM. Reason: fucking pedantic fucks.
-
10-29-2009, 01:28 PM #2
yes please
People should learn endurance; they should learn to endure the discomforts of heat and cold, hunger and thirst; they should learn to be patient when receiving abuse and scorn; for it is the practice of endurance that quenches the fire of worldly passions which is burning up their bodies.
--Buddha
*))
((*
*))
((*
www.skiclinics.com
-
10-29-2009, 01:47 PM #3
isnt there a saying around here that might apply to this situation?
oh yeah....
worthless without pics!!!!!!!!!!!!!"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Ben Franklin
-
10-29-2009, 01:48 PM #4....................
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 5,518
hypothetically speaking, am I getting paid? what kind of distribution are we talking about?
-
10-29-2009, 01:58 PM #5
-
10-29-2009, 03:02 PM #6
Are you sure you want her to start down this path ? Don't complain when you find yourself left out later as a result of it .
Don't forget to take some stills and post them here .
-
10-29-2009, 03:08 PM #7
I think the question is, who would be weird enough not to allow that?
-
10-29-2009, 03:42 PM #8don't tell me no...
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- ut, happily
- Posts
- 1,840
Posting my early, albeit way more feminist objection than i'd like it to sound but - just on the basis of using the terms ALLOW / LET???
if I was your girlfriend, I'd say fuck you, if I feel like doing girl on girl porn, I'm gonna do it- it's not really your call to make. (STDs not withstanding-safe sex presumed here...you can either get on board or get lost)
wife is slightly different, but not much - you can voice your objections if you have them, and ultimately, she might decide it's not worth risking/affecting the marriage for... but honestly if this is on the table, and you don't have the same views about it.. marriage might need help anyway/be done for regardless. take that with a pinch of hot girl ass.current ventures:
<<| Downhill-Divas |>> social network for women's mountain biking, skiing & snowboarding!
twitter.com/elisabethos
Adventures in Search & Social Marketing
...pmgear...
-
10-29-2009, 03:53 PM #9
^^
Are you serious?
-
10-29-2009, 03:56 PM #10don't tell me no...
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- ut, happily
- Posts
- 1,840
current ventures:
<<| Downhill-Divas |>> social network for women's mountain biking, skiing & snowboarding!
twitter.com/elisabethos
Adventures in Search & Social Marketing
...pmgear...
-
10-29-2009, 03:58 PM #11who guards the guardians?
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 5,764
I'm just a simple girl trying to make my way in the universe...
I come up hard, baby but now I'm cool I didn't make it, sugar playin' by the rules
If you know your history, then you would know where you coming from, then you wouldn't have to ask me, who the heck do I think I am.
-
10-29-2009, 03:59 PM #12Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Tahoe
- Posts
- 2,690
-
10-29-2009, 04:05 PM #13
-
10-29-2009, 04:05 PM #14don't tell me no...
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- ut, happily
- Posts
- 1,840
current ventures:
<<| Downhill-Divas |>> social network for women's mountain biking, skiing & snowboarding!
twitter.com/elisabethos
Adventures in Search & Social Marketing
...pmgear...
-
10-29-2009, 04:08 PM #15
-
10-29-2009, 04:09 PM #16
From a feminists point of view, which is worse; objectifying your body and exploiting your sexuality or committing oneself to a monogamous, mutually respectful relationship with another human?
-
10-29-2009, 04:09 PM #17
Girl on girl is the key to this question.
If my wife wanted to do some girl/girl, I'd have to have a long conversation about it with her.
If I was single and had a GF or SO that wanted to do girl/girl, then all I could could do is ask if I could be apart of the project, or if I could at least watch. It's really not your decision.Bush got C's.... Obama probably failed lunch
-
10-29-2009, 04:10 PM #18
-
10-29-2009, 04:19 PM #19....................
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 5,518
-
10-29-2009, 05:36 PM #20don't tell me no...
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- ut, happily
- Posts
- 1,840
um, you'd have to ask SkiingBear if he's interested in doing that...if the answer is yes, i would venture it'd only be for 'quiet money' with some famous athlete or movie star if he'd ever consider it... in which case, i'd probably be on board, that's like winning the lottery!
but if was for any other reason, then like I said below, i'd be a little more concerned about the overall state of our marriage
irul&ublo- well, it is girls nite... there will be lots of wine so you never know what'll happen... but i think i'll be stuffing my face with sushi!!current ventures:
<<| Downhill-Divas |>> social network for women's mountain biking, skiing & snowboarding!
twitter.com/elisabethos
Adventures in Search & Social Marketing
...pmgear...
-
10-29-2009, 05:39 PM #21
-
10-29-2009, 06:26 PM #22
-
10-29-2009, 08:20 PM #23
I expected one of your longer thought out responses.
And to the skiguide response, clearly the *LET* is a valid word to use. Yes, the girlfriend is free to do what she wants, but since relationships are mutual things, and in a traditional relationship in most societies, monogamy is presumed, let is the right word just as the g/f would need to "let" you do a gay porno with another dude. You or she can do it anyways, but unless there is a discussion and agreement beforehand, it will likely damage the relationship, probably irreparably.
That said, the girl on girl = hot IMO... not so hot about the porno part of it (strangers paying to watch)Originally Posted by blurred
-
10-29-2009, 08:42 PM #24
-
10-29-2009, 08:48 PM #25
Bookmarks