Results 51 to 75 of 179
Thread: Dear Conservatives
-
05-24-2009, 05:15 PM #51
Reason I ask: if they can(it makes sense that they should be able to) and aren't, then Bush didn't destroy or even erode our system of checks and balances(as many have claimed). Instead, he merely revealed that it was already broken and the fault lies with congress for not doing their constitutionally mandated job, not with the Bush administration.
it's all young and fun and skiing and then one day you login and it's relationship advice, gomer glacier tours and geezers.
-Hugh Conway
-
05-24-2009, 05:18 PM #52
-
05-24-2009, 08:47 PM #53
My God you are living is la la land. Conservatives are diven by their values? They they voted for Obama and still support him even though "their values are in such contrast to his". If conservatives really voted their values then according to your assessment of Obama being such a liberal conservatives should have never voted for Obama. The wouldn't have to had voted for the Republicans either as there were other candidates they could have voted for. Even if you tried arguing they voted for Obama to send a message to the Republicans that wouldn't explain his current approval numbers. Of coarse that argument would mean conservatives vote out of spite rather than their values.
Face it from the poll you love and Obama's approval numbers he is popular with those conservatives (probably the somewhat conservatives albiet) even though the is spending government money like crazy. So either Obama is not as liberal as you'd like to think or these conservatives are not as conservative as you'd hope."It's not that she said anything that wasn't true, it's that what she did say has almost no relation to the truth." - Rubicon
"To me, believing that God will drop a giant building on Greenland is no more bat shit crazy than thinking the US government can run the healthcare industry or properly regulate the financial industry" - Downbound Train
-
05-24-2009, 09:01 PM #54
Purge the government how? Like with violence? People rising up and taking shit into their own hands? That will cause far more problems than it could ever hope to solve.
Did you mean by peaceful means? Who's going to be in charge of that purging? Do we form a committee of politicians to oversee this purge? Who's going to enforce it?
This idea of a purge is as naive as the hippies in the 60's thinking they could end war.
The best we could hope for is that in 4 or 8 years, people become as fed up with the dems as they are with GOP now, then maybe third party candidates will become viable. I actually think that by driving people away from the GOP, the Bush admin might have actually accomplished something wonderful, albeit, unintentionally, it is the first step towards much needed change in this country. I have this fear that even if the dems drive people away from them, people are so stupid and unimaginative, that they'll just go right back to the GOP, regardless of whether or not they have changed at all.
If third party platforms become viable, then we might be able to bring power back to the states and restore the fedgov to its original role. A struggling economy = a weakened fedgov, so states have a chance.
I have hope that we may see some real change for the better in this country. Things have certainly stagnated for long enough that change is coming, this will not be the same America in ten years, its just whether we change for the better and land on our feet or become a police state with a stagnant economy.__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ________________
"We don't need predator control, we need whiner control. Anyone who complains that "the gummint oughta do sumpin" about the wolves and coyotes should be darted, caged, and released in a more suitable habitat for them, like the middle of Manhattan." - Spats
"I'm constantly doing things I can't do. Thats how I get to do them." - Pablo Picasso
-
05-24-2009, 09:06 PM #55
I am reading this book called "Gangs of New York" (the same as the movie)
The Draft Riots of 1863 were pretty crazy. Goes to show how pissed off people can get.http://www.carpathianskis.com
Slay the Mountain
-
05-24-2009, 09:29 PM #56
Or, there is a third possibility.
Your entire argument is based on the assumption that everyone in America knows everything that Obama is doing and understands what it means in the context of the country and their professed values. I don't think that is an assumption you can make.it's all young and fun and skiing and then one day you login and it's relationship advice, gomer glacier tours and geezers.
-Hugh Conway
-
05-24-2009, 10:09 PM #57
So the conservatives who support Obama are dumb? Of coarse not everyone who supports Obama understands everything he is doing, but many do. You just can't handle that some of the conservatives that support Obama do know what he is doing and what it means to their values.
"It's not that she said anything that wasn't true, it's that what she did say has almost no relation to the truth." - Rubicon
"To me, believing that God will drop a giant building on Greenland is no more bat shit crazy than thinking the US government can run the healthcare industry or properly regulate the financial industry" - Downbound Train
-
05-24-2009, 10:39 PM #58
Purge the way you discribe it is what I had in mind. Ballot box revolution. Third party would be the best but maybe not realistic.
Could a leader rise within an existing party that could rise above the status quo and literally change the entire party?
That would be my hope. A Libertarian movement within the Republican Party would have the best chance of getting something done.
Problem with 3rd party is that you have to not just win a Presidential Election. You have to have majority support in the Gov to govern, and that's a lot of 3rd party winners.
Like Jessie Ventura in Minnesota. He won but after awhile, both parties gave him hell. (Of course he was a nut job which didn't help but the point is, one guy can't change the system alone)
-
05-24-2009, 10:48 PM #59
No, just busy living their lives. Our system of government has historically been stable enough that people have become accustom to being able pay scant attention to the day to day actions of our politicians and still live a comfortable life.
Obama is far different from any other president in our life times. It's going to take a while for the American people to realize just how far left he is.
You are wrong. But if that is what you choose to believe there is nothing I can do to convince you otherwise.You just can't handle that some of the conservatives that support Obama do know what he is doing and what it means to their values.it's all young and fun and skiing and then one day you login and it's relationship advice, gomer glacier tours and geezers.
-Hugh Conway
-
05-24-2009, 11:31 PM #60
Well ideally, a third party becoming viable wouldn't just be a shift to a new two party system, it would open things up for a fourth and fifth party, and a more open minded way of doing things.
Things would be a lot more chaotic, for a while at least, and it would be harder to get shit done, but imagine if there were several different parties running this country. Once shit got sorted out a little, instead of two parties constantly trying to undermine each others every move just because the other guys are "the enemy" everyone would have more choices than just "fight the enemy, whatever they say, say the opposite".__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ________________
"We don't need predator control, we need whiner control. Anyone who complains that "the gummint oughta do sumpin" about the wolves and coyotes should be darted, caged, and released in a more suitable habitat for them, like the middle of Manhattan." - Spats
"I'm constantly doing things I can't do. Thats how I get to do them." - Pablo Picasso
-
05-25-2009, 12:03 AM #61
You really should open your eyes. A lot of people are paying attention. Their day to day lives are not comfortable and they approve of what Obama's doing. Now they may not be paying attention to the republican spin.
You said the majority of people are conservative and the majority of people approve of Obama. Now If Obama's numbers drop dramatically or he loses to a conservative then you could convince me of what your desperately trying to believe has merit. But until then face reality there is no revolt against him and they aren't as you said "regretting their vote for Obama".You are wrong. But if that is what you choose to believe there is nothing I can do to convince you otherwise."It's not that she said anything that wasn't true, it's that what she did say has almost no relation to the truth." - Rubicon
"To me, believing that God will drop a giant building on Greenland is no more bat shit crazy than thinking the US government can run the healthcare industry or properly regulate the financial industry" - Downbound Train
-
05-25-2009, 02:01 AM #62
What is left and what is right? What is liberal and what is conservative? I know we had a good thread where you can answer a few questions and end up in a quadrant with Hitler or Gandi, but what does that mean for 'Mericans???
All you Euros, just stay out of this thread, we're trying to work things out ;-)Education must be the answer, we've tried ignorance and it doesn't work! Wait, nevermind, when you see a liberal using science to advance an idea...grab your wallet and your freedom and run.
-
05-25-2009, 02:03 AM #63
Canadiens and Mexicans welcome. I'm the new moderator Jer.
Education must be the answer, we've tried ignorance and it doesn't work! Wait, nevermind, when you see a liberal using science to advance an idea...grab your wallet and your freedom and run.
-
05-25-2009, 08:48 AM #64
Dear Conservatives,
Quit bitching and form your own party. I'm sick of you fucktards dragging the Republican party down with you.
Abe & TR are rolling in their graves.Balls Deep in the 'Ho
-
05-25-2009, 09:16 AM #65
That would be nice but I'm sceptical of a 3rd or 4th or 5th party succeeding. To win in our system you need a majority vote, and I can't really imagine more than 2 parties consistently winning majorities.
People are "joiners" but base their individual vote on very few issues. They join the place that represents thier issue(s). There are not enough issues to support multiple parties. One of the 2 parties right now has something for 90%of the people. How can the rest fit in with enough support? Especially since so many people seem to be more that happy to cast a "lesser of 2 evils" vote.
I think the only REALISTIC chance for immediate change is for a Libertarian movement to rise within the Republican party. That CAN happen.
-
05-25-2009, 09:25 AM #66Balls Deep in the 'Ho
-
05-25-2009, 10:24 AM #67
-
05-25-2009, 10:27 AM #68
Debating with conservative republicans is like arguing with a stone wall. Your intelligent observations and plain facts have NO EFFECT on them whatsoever!
They only understand classism, racism, war, and fear mongering. (oh yeah, and not wanting to pay ANY taxes at all)
Why bother? It just stirs them up and makes them act more and more loony! Just look at them nowadays. (Malkin, Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, Beck, etc...) I watch FOX "news" now sometimes just for the entertainment factor. I can only last a few minutes before either slapping myself in the forehead (doh!) or busting up laughing! They all seem to have that scary "wing-nut glazed-over look" in their eyes. Ever notice?
Gay marriage will ruin the world but pissing off the entire rest of the world is patriotic?Leave No Turn Unstoned!
-
05-25-2009, 10:34 AM #69
-
05-25-2009, 10:59 AM #70
Yep, sounds like RubeLogic.
He "reserved judgement" on sarah Palin to the end, when it was blatantly obvious to most that she was a nutjob, but he passed judgement on Obama long before he took office.
Typical. But that sorta ideologically-based blindness will keep the repub party in the minority, so it's fine by me.
-
05-25-2009, 11:44 AM #71
Sarah Palin has a clear track record in Alaska. None of it falls into the "Nutjob" category. Yet, based on nothing but your dislike for her possitions and dumb sounding accent, you just KNOW she's a nutjob.
Obama had NO track record except one of being the farthest left voting Senator in the US Senate. He's far more "Extreem" on the political spectrum that anyone who ran for Prez or Vice. Palin crossed the isle in Alaska. Obama NEVER did.
It isn't hard to pass judgment before an election, your vote IS your passed judgment.
Obama has done nothing to change the view that we had of him before the election. He's step by step working the Saul Alinsky play book from "Rules for Radicals". How can anyone NOT pass judgement after 100 days.
Rubi has an ideology but it's FAR from BLIND.
AND the reason you give for the Repubs being in the minority is wrong. When they field a true conservative who can articulate the message, they will be back in power.
-
05-25-2009, 01:20 PM #72
-
05-25-2009, 01:25 PM #73
Of course, the thing most people miss is that the current Republican Party is more liberal than the Democratic Party was just a few decades ago. Other than the abortion issue, they're both so far left it's laughable. Our founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.
I'd prefer just enough government to keep us from toppling into anarchy, no more, thank you very much.
-
05-25-2009, 01:36 PM #74
Bullshit. You Tvo The O'Rielly Factor every day just like the rest of the obsessed libdouches here.
Damn, that's some grade-A irony there!
I already fixed it for him a few pages ago.
For some reason dogs pooping always brings a smile to my face.

Everytime I'm driving around and I see a dog pooping, I always encourage him by yelling "Good job, boy!! Goooood Job!!!".
-
05-25-2009, 01:41 PM #75













Reply With Quote






Bookmarks