Results 201 to 225 of 1727
Thread: Binding Mount Paper Templates
-
04-04-2010, 09:28 PM #201
Thanks to DrDom for measuring his brand new Griffon bindings. It turns out that they are different from the Jester/Griffon template on page one. Can anyone shed light on why this is? Is the new griffon/jester a different pattern, or has the griffon always been different from the jester?
Originally Posted by DrDom
-
04-04-2010, 10:06 PM #202
I have never used the templates on here (I use a Marker jig in my shop) but I can tell you that the Griffon/Jester use the same jig and hole pattern. Additionally, these have remained unchanged since they were released in 07/08.
So: either the template is wrong (possible) or there was a user error (possible as well.)
-
04-04-2010, 10:15 PM #203Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Livermore, CA
- Posts
- 191
Probably 230 to 300. If the boot any particular person is mounting is shorter/longer, it isn't that difficult to mark off additional boot centers once you've got a few on the paper. These are junior bindings and so aren't for the really wee little tikes running around in 200 bsl boots.
Just like my Jester measurements, the BSL mark is an educated guess. For the particular boots I mounted for, I wound up around the middle of the rear track after adjusting forward pressure. Send me the pdf once you make it and I can do some test mounts with different boots on 2x material and let you know if there are any adjustments needed.
-----------
Regarding the 314 BSL mount being at the very forward part of the screw travel.....my measures could be off. I don't think we've ever had someone with one of the paper templates that came with the 08/09 Jesters step up and give measures off the in-box template. Those measures would be really helpful.......
-
05-05-2010, 11:02 AM #204Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Sweden
- Posts
- 61
Is the Look NX the same plate as the Look PX?
And also, when i put the papers together, the BSL should match right?
320 should be on the other papers 320 right?
Just wanna check weverything to 110% before i start
-
06-30-2010, 12:01 PM #205Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 115
Do somebody have 4frnt Deadbolt 15 templates?
-
06-30-2010, 01:30 PM #206
^^ It should be the same as the Head Mojo template. Double check to be sure.
-
07-01-2010, 11:03 AM #207Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 115
-
09-11-2010, 03:55 PM #208Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 1
Thanks for all involved in making the templates. I've just mounted up some Fischer X14's using the tyrolia template, worked fine.
-
09-11-2010, 08:49 PM #209Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Golden, BC
- Posts
- 298
-
09-12-2010, 01:12 AM #210
-
09-13-2010, 07:56 PM #211
I updated the Salomon jig based on a pair of 997 equipe bindings I fished out of my archive that requires the brakes to be mounted into a hole in the ski (which is NOT the traditional 5th hole). So I added that to the template, and people can ignore it as needed.
-
09-27-2010, 09:15 PM #212
Couple things:
- thank you very much for this thread. I mounted my EHPs without incident. Only took 3 hours and 3 test mounts to ensure I wouldn't mess up brand new skis.
- I'm trying to mount some 12 DIN rossis. I think they are the SAS120 or something like that. The mount pattern looks to match the px racing template. It certainly isn't the axial2 pattern. Can anyone confirm this?
- I can't seem to get the print scaling right. It seems I need to scale to 99.5%, but neither my home or work printers can do the job. 100% and 99% are both off by a mm or so. Does anyone have any tips?
Thanks in advance
-
09-27-2010, 09:38 PM #213
While this is alive and being bumped let me say I recently used the sally template for 14 din
997s. Didn't need the brake hole and all good!
Also are barons the same pattern as dukes? Can anyone verify the duke template works for barons too??
-
09-27-2010, 09:51 PM #214
Are the holes actually in the wrong place, or is the scale on the side of the template off by 1mm?
If its just the scale that's off, you're probably fine; 1mm off on the scale isn't going to make much of a difference on where the holes are.
Otherwise, maybe try a combination of printing it at <100% and then copying it and enlarging it?
-
09-27-2010, 10:30 PM #215
my low end hp printer only scales to the integer percent, which is a pain in the ass. I found that my mounts work out quite well even if I'm off by a half a percent.
I can confirm 100% that barons have the same mounting pattern as dukes.
-
09-28-2010, 12:39 AM #216
-
09-29-2010, 09:19 AM #217
-
09-29-2010, 10:17 AM #218
Thanks again for this thread!! So far I have used the Look, Duke, and now the Dynafit templates. It's to the point where I trust my own mounts more than taking them to a shop. The dynafit mount is more acurate than the one I had done at the shop.
-
10-01-2010, 02:29 PM #219
duke/barron templates
Did a dry run with the duke template on a 2x4 for my barrons. Seems to have worked out well. THANKS for the info.
Last edited by mtbcat; 10-01-2010 at 02:37 PM. Reason: sp
-
10-01-2010, 07:14 PM #220
So I'm about to mount these Barons, but I'm a little confused looking at the template.
The way I understood it these are adjustable to multiple BSL's within the small range without having to re-mount...
That said I was assuming that they would mount like a demo binding with one standard hole placement regardless of boot size. Then I looked at the template and see that it has BSL center mark numbers on it like any standard binding, so what gives?
Looks like increasing BSL moves the toe AND HEEL screws forward rather than the toe forward and heel back like I would have thought? My BSL is 290 but it seems like I'm going to have to mount these at about 305 or 310 in order to get the center line I want and avoid some old holes that I would be too close too at 290.
That shouldn't be a problem right??
-
10-01-2010, 08:22 PM #221The way I understood it these are adjustable to multiple BSL's within the small range without having to re-mount
-
10-01-2010, 09:40 PM #222
Honestly I'm looking at these templates and am at a point now where I don't understand my question either...
So the BSL lines on the Duke template are basically for placing the toepiece in the right spot compared to the center line but the distance from toe to heel is the same no matter what the BSL?
Seems like this means I'm screwed if I want to mount to a center line where the toe interferes with old holes, huh? If I increase the BSL all I will be doing is pushing the toe forward and then when I adjust the heel to my boots the center will be forward from my mark... does that sound right?
A little tipsy at this point and still trying to wrap my head around this project, hope I was clear enough!
and BTW for the mounting guru's, it's 1cm from center to center that holes need to be spaced from each other, right??
-
10-02-2010, 01:25 AM #223
-
10-02-2010, 06:50 PM #224
-
10-02-2010, 08:33 PM #225
Thanks. The hole pattern is definitely right. A 2x4 mount seems to indicate that I need to move the heel forward a bit though. Otherwise I can't get the forward pressure right without running out of track. Putting the template on the skis the bindings came off of would indicate the same. I'm going to investigate further tomorrow.
I got the printer scaling issue figured out. Replacing the color ink cartridge did the trick.
Bookmarks