Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
10-21-2003, 07:26 AM #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Germany
- Posts
- 10
K2 Public Enemy vs Rossignol Scratch BC
I could get a Rossignol Scratch BC with a Rossignol Scratch 100 binding for 500€(=580$) or a K2 Public Enemy with a Marker Titanium 1200 Free binding for 400€(=464$). Which one shall I get? What exactly is the rocking chair effect of the Scratch BC? Wouldn't that make you lose balance? Which one is more durable?
-
10-21-2003, 08:16 AM #2
Public Enemy
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- City of Angels
- Posts
- 310
What are you gonna be using the skis for?
-
10-21-2003, 10:18 AM #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Germany
- Posts
- 10
freeriding and powder is what i love the most. oh yeah and reckless highspeed-skiing of course
generally everything that gets your blood pumping. i also wanna do a bit of park, but not too much
-
10-21-2003, 10:28 AM #4
Public Enemy
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- City of Angels
- Posts
- 310
Get the PE's... They are more versatile..
Edit: But if you ski some place that gets lots of pow... Go for the Seth Pistols...Last edited by Tical; 10-21-2003 at 02:06 PM.
-
10-22-2003, 01:15 AM #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Alyeska Alaska
- Posts
- 108
Rossi bC
The bc or fs are so the way to go ive ridein the pupic enemeys nothin to the smoothness of rossis line.
-
10-22-2003, 05:22 PM #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Earth-ish.
- Posts
- 673
^^Stupid ass.
The rocking chair effect? Like when it is center mounted and the ski will fall forward instead of staying back all the time like a normal ski. You get used to it.No.
-
10-23-2003, 03:40 PM #7
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Alyeska Alaska
- Posts
- 108
/\ /\ Blow me bitch.
-
10-31-2003, 03:44 AM #8
Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Germany
- Posts
- 10
well, in the thread http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...&threadid=1885 this dude says that the "Scratch BC is too heavy to be a good park ski, and too soft to be a good all-mountain ski". Would you second that? Shall I rather get the PE? And which one is better in terms of durability and stability?
EDIT: I'm 1,87m (6"3). Is a 179 PE to short for me? If I were to get rossis, should I get a 182 or 188 BC?Last edited by christof; 10-31-2003 at 04:19 AM.
-
10-31-2003, 07:17 AM #9
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- CB
- Posts
- 5,894
This question really depends on how much pow your gonna be riding, if not much at all go with the PE's, but the 10 mm in the waist makes a big difference in my mind....You also might wanna think about the V-pro's....great all-mountain ski, 83 in the waist, and not bad in the park, it may solve all your problems.....
Z
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks