Notices

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 139
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,789
    Quote Originally Posted by bostonjohn View Post
    i heard 08-09 mount at 0
    09-10 at +3

    i am doing some research waiting to hear back from a few people i check back with the info i get...

    Has the mounting point line on the ski moved for 09/10? Because the ski is unchanged.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    11,348
    ^^^ I'm interested in hearing this as well. I've got the 09/10 S7s and was told that the sweet spot is 0 or -2.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,019
    Is it true sage is at +3? not a switch skier, but stylie in the air. HMMM
    I always go with boot midsole factory reccommended and its been good so far. skiing switch is cool...........
    Uh how come my skis are directional......
    thats so you know if your facing downhill in whiteout when you get vertigo....
    I need to go to Utah.
    Utah?
    Yeah, Utah. It's wedged in between Wyoming and Nevada. You've seen pictures of it, right?

    20 days skiing in 2009/2010 (15 Powder days)
    18 days skiing in 2010/2011 (15 Powder days)
    16 days skiing in 2011/2012 (2 cat days and 11 Powder day's)
    18 days skiing in 2012/2013 (12 powder day's)

    Thanks BCSAR

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Hood River, OR
    Posts
    644
    The 188's ski great at +3 I've never had any problems even in super deep powder and they are super maneuverable everywhere.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,789
    Quote Originally Posted by D(C) View Post
    Has the mounting point line on the ski moved for 09/10? Because the ski is unchanged.
    I was just at a shop that had both the 08-09s and the 09-10s in 176. I can't speak about the 188s but on the 176s the 0 line appears to be the same for both years. Both years have +3 and +6 lines, but the 09-10 also has a -2 line.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wydaho
    Posts
    1,614
    Just got my 09/10 188 S7's.
    Measuring from tail with tape pulled straight:
    84.3 cm to -2 mount point
    86.3 cm to 0 mount point

    Will wait for more info before mounting

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,789
    Quote Originally Posted by whorehey View Post
    Just got my 09/10 188 S7's.
    Measuring from tail with tape pulled straight:
    84.3 cm to -2 mount point
    86.3 cm to 0 mount point

    Will wait for more info before mounting
    That seems to confirm that the 0 line is in the same spot both years.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    956
    Quote Originally Posted by whorehey View Post
    86.3 cm to 0 mount point
    hmm last year I measured them at 86.1 to the 0 point line, does anyone know for sure if they changed the mounting position by .2?

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wydaho
    Posts
    1,614
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiED View Post
    hmm last year I measured them at 86.1 to the 0 point line, does anyone know for sure if they changed the mounting position by .2?
    Touche
    It wasn't 86 and it wasn't 86.5.
    I presented the data, and I have no problem with D(C) confirming that year to year mount points seems the same.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    535
    i have nothing to confirm but it seems like you guys got it dialed, i just heard something from someone that the mounting point has changed . Im pretty sure I will be going +3 on the 188 but not going to mount for a bit.
    @EdgeLinkJohn

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Depends on the Day
    Posts
    897
    I mounted my 08/09's at +3. Loved them. Then they sidewall exploded and I was sent the 09/10's. I had those mounted at +3 as well. I don't love it as much. I almost feel as though they are too far forward. Get sent over the bars a bit when I drive the ski. I hate remounting my skis but may move them back to +1.5.

    We will see.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,019
    Compared to my ARG the 0 line (recommended) line seems good. Otherwise way too little ski up front. The current review is these skis look sick sitting on my wall rack. Nice curvy flex, great colors and rocker.

    MFR recomeneded is recommended, so what do I know............
    I need to go to Utah.
    Utah?
    Yeah, Utah. It's wedged in between Wyoming and Nevada. You've seen pictures of it, right?

    20 days skiing in 2009/2010 (15 Powder days)
    18 days skiing in 2010/2011 (15 Powder days)
    16 days skiing in 2011/2012 (2 cat days and 11 Powder day's)
    18 days skiing in 2012/2013 (12 powder day's)

    Thanks BCSAR

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    11,348
    Bump... anyone get their 09/10's mounted yet? I'm thinking I'll go with the "0" line.

  14. #39
    zo Guest
    Mount lines on skis are often just considered part of the graphic, and therefore aren't always perfect or the same. Use this:
    Attached Files Attached Files

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    11,348
    I didn't really read anything stating otherwise, so I had mine mounted today at the "0" line. I'll report back on how they perform once we get some worthy snow.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wydaho
    Posts
    1,614
    Third hand info says that's where Sage rides his S7's.
    What did you mount them with?

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    My armchair
    Posts
    4,609
    ... Once again, Zo coming through. Too bad everyone can't just download the pdf he put up, think as an individual what you want this ski to do for you and then mount - no questions asked!! Instead of posting up beauty salon non-sense
    "... she'll never need a doctor; 'cause I check her out all day"

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    11,348
    I'm not hardcore like everyone else on here, so I mounted them with some measly Rossi SAS 110s. I've had good luck with them in the past, and they're cheap.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,911
    matt,
    I am supposed to get my super 7's in a month (heard that last year as well). Everyone i saw mounted +3 looked way too forward. No tip whatsoever. I never skied em, but i will be mounting center or a one or two behind FYI

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,048
    I had a buddy riding Super 7s last season. Originally he had them on 0 line and liked them but remounted at +3 and loved them more. Said they were more manageable and versatile and still had zero tip dive issues in pow, said he could still ski them forward in pow. So again, +3 was the money line for him and he charges, don't know how much switch he was skiing if any, but I imagine he was because he can but still more big mountain oriented than freestyle. I talked to him about this a month ago before he went to CR. It is quite a centered mount considering +6 is ski center.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    2
    Is the Super 7 still really playful? I was thinking of picking up the 188's as a quick turning pow/tree ski, but can probably only get my hands on the 195. Already have a 185 Mothership, would it be too similar (quickness wise)? I am 6'1", 180. Any thoughts?
    Thanks

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Hood River, OR
    Posts
    644
    How can you only get the super limited release version, but not the very plentiful retail 188?

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    2
    Work at a shop and can special order them, but all they have left for a deal are the 76's and 95's. The 88's sold out super fast

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,789
    The 195 S7s will probably be more soft snow oriented than your Motherships. You could use the S7s for new snow and deeper days and the Motherships for everyday. If I were doing it, I would probably look for the 188s though and use them on storm days when you can't see and use the Motherships for going fast. Either way, you're probably good.

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Hood River, OR
    Posts
    644
    Quote Originally Posted by anemski View Post
    Work at a shop and can special order them, but all they have left for a deal are the 76's and 95's. The 88's sold out super fast

    Not a bad thingI bet. As much as I love my 188s I bet the 195s are going to be more fun in nearly every aspect, except for possibly tight trees.

    Not to mention if you hate them I am sure there are plenty of people who would trade you the 188s for the 195s.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •