Results 51 to 74 of 74
-
06-03-2008, 01:36 PM #51
the 186 length on the rocker had to do with feedback i had gotten from other people on EHPs and DPS as well as my own experiences on lots of random skis. It also had to do with what length I thought was a good comprimise for this skis intended use and market.
I will also say that Id have never made a 186 if I hadnt also designed a 196.
Thus far, as far as I know, 186 has been it, but we're just starting to talk about the bigger brother.
Actually i need to call Pat back to talk it over.
but length isnt the only factor in a ski like this thats rockered and heavily tapered
effective edge plays a big role as well.
-
06-03-2008, 01:51 PM #52
ive never been on a rockered ski. what length does the 186 ski like? ie what does it throw around like? Im interested in a pair, but 186 is a big ski for me on the EC
/jongLive
-
06-03-2008, 02:06 PM #53
it depends on the snow honestly
on super hard ice bulletproof
they will ski short
like 165 type short
this is due to their effective edge
they arent the most stable here and have a speed limit imo, but are not scary to ski and are not in any sense of the phrase, needing to use a "survival skiing" technique as some people say about spats....which again, imo, isnt survival skiing either, but i digress
however, put them on edge, be gentle with your angulation, stay balanced, and theyll put a smile on your face....so long as you dont want them to carve bulletproof every day 24/7. They do it, and do it OK, but its not my first choice. (should be a "duh")
Put some fresh fluff down ontop of firm or a soft base, and these come alive
they seem to arc about 25-30m turns if you dont slide them around but can slide them around whenever, however, and whatever you please
in bottomless pow, they ski like a 186 pow ski
i think theres a little speed limit on them if you get sloppy and dont stay in the drivers seat, but thats more of a pilot input\error than the ski
really theyre very fun and easy to ski in tight spots and in difficult\variable\heavy snow
theyre not as easy to slash, pivot, or slide as spats, but they're a lot more rewarding imo to ski. it feels more like a real ski than a toy, again, imo.
id still wager though that skis like spats, praxis, or 138s are better in horrible breakable crust or really nasty avy debris.
If you can ski a 175 in pow and a 165 on ice, then you can ski these
ie if you dont suck, know how to ski a little bit, and are taller than about 5'4 and weigh more than 110-120lbs, these should be fine. As for the upper limit, Id say about 6' and 200lbs.Last edited by pechelman; 06-03-2008 at 02:09 PM.
-
06-03-2008, 02:21 PM #54
-
06-03-2008, 04:28 PM #55
Pechelman,
What is your take on the relationship between rocker and sidecut? I know that IMO one of the biggest failings of my sally rockers is that because the sidecut begins where the ski is not contacting the snow, the ski will not carve unless you weight your heels through the turn.
-
06-03-2008, 04:38 PM #56
referring to tip sidecut only (ie ~ tip width - waist width)
its a tricky balance between having enough tip sidecut to "settle out" the tip of the ski when it has rocker
ie, the more sidecut the easier and quicker it will be to engage the tip and keep it from flapping on firm
similarly, too much sidecut with a rocker ski, and it gets too hooky and is really unstable or can be
solly has a good bit of rocker and not a huge amount of sidecut if i remember it right, so skiing from the heel, or skiing from the tail sidecut is a totally reasonable way to carve them....much how one "carves" a spat or a 138
its a tricky balance, and with skis like the 186, im currently convinced that less rocker is better and more tip sidecut (up to a point), is also better. change things up like with something shaped like a goode scoop, praxis, arg, or 138 and thats a different story.
-
06-03-2008, 04:39 PM #57
Splat let me borrow a version of the Brocker with exaggerated rocker compared to the normal version. Unfortunately, I didn't really get much time on them before I gave them back, and I never skied the normal version, so I can't really compare. They seemed to be the shit though, and a certain pro skier who knows a thing or two about rockered skis, lets call him Wayne HickTonkey, spied them on me as was very impressed with the tip shape.
Last time I talked with Splat I think he was considering offering two rocker options.
Splat: Sorry if I'm blowing it here, you didn't seem to be trying to keep these too much a secret.
Everyone: Don't get your panties all in a bundle. Maybe Splat figured out the exaggerated rocker version didn't work as well as the original and won't be offering them at all. We'll have to see what he says.
Edit: AFAIK, all other dims on the version I tried were the same as the original.ROBOTS ARE EATING MY FACE.
-
06-03-2008, 06:30 PM #58Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- summit co
- Posts
- 36
I have been skiing some Brockers with Dukes for the last couple of months and would agree with Vets and Pechelman. I'm 6' 185. They are very easy to turn in almost any snow if you stay over them and in softer snow there is a strong sense of control and stability, despite their shorter feel. It only gets better in deeper and/or more difficult snow. I think they are great and have skied them a lot, both in the resorts and out.
Samurai- I have used mine (with the dukes) a lot for short skins and boot packs and really like having the performance. I have to admit though, that the last couple of weeks I have been doing more longer approaches, due to the great conditions around here, and have been mostly using some old 188 soft bros with FR's. The latter setup is lighter and skins easier, but the Brocker/Dukes are acceptable, especially for short ventures. The Brockers are definitely more fun to ski though.
-
06-04-2008, 01:32 PM #59glocal
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 33,440
I still need to test the exaggerated tip rocker version (that'll be a while), but all the feedback is that it works just fine. I almost mounted that pair you had, bossass, to ski this last weekend (oh, am I kicking myself in the ass for not doing so - but I can't reach my ass with my foot). The feedback we got from the pros on it is that it's awesome in the deep. I just wanted to get it out in hardpack and see it rails like the regular Brocker.
As soon as I figure out what md9 will do for the new topsheet, we'll put the Brockers up on the website. Until then, we're taking preorders for brown 192, green 188, and the old blue tops.
-
06-04-2008, 01:39 PM #60
-
06-04-2008, 08:37 PM #61
-
06-10-2008, 12:29 AM #62
Today I found another snow condition where the Brockers excelled, suncups.
The wide rocker tip works great!
Here is a link to a TR.
-
06-23-2008, 05:13 PM #63
Splat,
Do you have any thoughts yet on the 196 timeframe? Are we going to be available to order this badboy for the upcoming season?
-
06-23-2008, 10:27 PM #64glocal
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 33,440
I just ordered some base for a batch of 196 protos, got md9 thinking about a dedicated top design that will go on both sizes and hope to have the first batch tested, perfected and available by Christmas. My injury set back my timeline by 5-6 weeks, but if all goes well, we could shorten that projection.
-
06-23-2008, 11:15 PM #65
How much more will the 196s weigh over the 186s?
Originally Posted by wintermittentOriginally Posted by snowsprite
-
06-24-2008, 06:06 AM #66
thats probably not easy to answer since not only are they still in the proto phase, where they use different amounts of everything, but I dont think theyve build any 196's yet
i believe...?Live
-
06-26-2008, 10:18 AM #67glocal
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 33,440
Not much more, since the diims will be the same, so it's 10 cm more. We could do the math based on a 5 lb carbon 186, Stroup. Or ask pechelman to bust out the weird science.
Got a guy up in the Cascades determining the tele pin line on the 186s right now. He sent me some telebrocker pics. They'll show up in the photo gallery on the PMG website soon. I'll post some here when I finally get home. He said they're killing it and couldn't believe the carve.
edit:
the first shots of Brockers gone tele:
-
10-30-2008, 10:53 PM #68
Bump for another maggot developed ski. Welcome to production.
Goals for the season: -Try and pick up a sponsor.--Phill
But whatever scares you most... --Rip'nStick
-
10-30-2008, 11:31 PM #69glocal
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 33,440
Sheeeat. We are right in line with the projections for the 196 development I made in June. Ahead of schedule. Skis will ship daily until we have everyone taken care of. 192s, half the 186s, all the 188s are pressed and the 179s are in the works now, followed by more 186s and 196s.
-
10-31-2008, 06:41 AM #70
-
10-31-2008, 07:57 AM #71
On my way back home from Winnemucca last weekend I stopped by the PM Gear Factory in Reno. I got a chance to fondle many pairs of 186 Lhasa Pows as well as the 196s and many other skis. The production is very impressive. I had to go out to my car and get a big towel to wipe off the drool. I'm still madly in love and feel like a groom waiting for the night of the honeymoon when I'll be getting my ya-yas out this winter. Anticipating O-faces, face shots, and many blissful grins.
-
11-01-2008, 09:11 PM #72
you could say that i would be your man-bitch for all of eternity if my carbon lhasas happened to make it to maine in time for this weekends opening . . . but that would be a drastic understatement. I'm hoping to be able to completely out-gun everyone in the northeast with your stupid sick skis the very first day..
-
11-02-2008, 10:02 PM #73glocal
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 33,440
Damn, I'm sorry to disappoint you, sloafer, but I think we're pressing yours next week. We took a chunk out of the preorders and such over the last couple of weeks, but had to knock out the 188s and 179s. I don't think we can do next weekend. Hopefully, you'll have rocked your other skis to death (literally) and get your new boards just in time for the deep.
-
11-11-2008, 08:18 AM #74
wow, how did I not see that post until now, I thought i had been searching all the Lhasa threads thouroughly (sp?). Well, sorry I saw this only after I sent you that email Pat.
Anyways, I can assure you that I most certainly will beat the rest of my quiver into submission in preparation for the arrival of the 186s, hopefully that 'deep' you mentioned will hurry the fuck up. . .
Similar Threads
-
Dude--I freakin' love Fall
By grizzle6 in forum General Ski / Snowboard DiscussionReplies: 33Last Post: 09-07-2006, 01:59 PM -
Job Rant Thread
By Below Zero in forum The Padded RoomReplies: 34Last Post: 08-12-2006, 09:32 AM -
I almost killed a little girl today...
By Arty50 in forum General Ski / Snowboard DiscussionReplies: 29Last Post: 08-17-2005, 05:36 PM -
film session with kurt heine and sammy carlson today
By astralboy15 in forum General Ski / Snowboard DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 05-30-2005, 09:46 AM -
Tahoe: 2-3' at lake level today
By huckasoreass in forum General Ski / Snowboard DiscussionReplies: 23Last Post: 05-19-2005, 06:07 PM
Bookmarks