Search:

Nice. More leftist hyperbole. Lots of crazy white women are birthers too.

Your opinion has no value! ZERO!

Your opinion has no value, zero.

Your opinion has no value! ZERO! Zero.

Ban ice cream!

Could've picked any of a bunch, but that was the one in the immediately prior post, so easiest.

You're making a very strong case for dimmest wit here. Or most determined troll, maybe (though I've...

Well, yeah. Jesse doesn't care about Italians.

Pffft. Big deal. You think that's clever? Everyone already knows they all look alike.

Dummy. You should consider some collage.

Yes. It's not very compelling to present them as evidence of much of anything, other than that people feel freer to be assholes in an anonymous forum, and there's plenty of evidence of that all over...

What Jumper Bones said. Olbermann is an ass. It'd be great to see all of his ilk, from any part of the political spectrum, disappear, but it's not going to happen. Who watches that shit in more...

I'm aware you're having a difficult family situation, but I still say you can stand to dial back the humorless douche act a bit.

And edit to add, since I think you still didn't get it, my point...

:nonono2:

If we impose a regulation that inhibits one person from imprisoning another at the first person's whim, what have we done with respect to our collective freedom? How about the freedom of the first...

You should stop. You're painfully ignorant on this subject. Why don't you copy and paste the clause itself? It's clear on this. And, inventorship is an aspect of patent law different from the...

Yeah, I think I've heard of that clause. The fact that you think authorship has anything to do with patent law makes me comfortable disregarding your thoughts on the subject. Are you even aware...

Yes, I guess we are having a communication breakdown because I think you're almost certainly incorrect. I'll use my area of law as an example. Offhand, I don't see why virtually all of patent law...

I didn't assume anything. (I also suggested that the new regime may not include stare decisis as an attribute. For instance, my understanding is that civil law systems typically - always? - lack...

First, the statement that "[w]ith a new constitution, every constitutional theory is novel" is just not correct, except, perhaps, in a technical sense. This goes back to my point above that a new...

No. You said there wouldn't be any prior cases on the subject to enlighten a judge's decision. That's incorrect.

You act like a new constitution would be this alien thing with little...

That's not true. And it's not like stare decisis is a necessary component of a good legal system. I'd do away with it.

I wonder more why you feel moved to manufacture that reality.

Yes, opinion. I generally view claims of certainty about constitutional analysis with skepticism. My bad if what I said made it seem otherwise. My point is just that this type of analysis is...

No, it's not the same thing as saying a particular law is constitutional, but I think it is the same thing as saying that some such law can be constitutional. Or at least it's pretty close. Perhaps...

:nonono2:

You didn't need to tell me again that you understand little to nothing about the law.

Edit to add ...

Here's some reading for you (one of the first links from googling): ...

I think I skipped over line 3 of your post. You were allowing for gay/lesbian marriages in view of your understanding of the intent of marriage, right? I should pay attention.

I think that, long term, the societal progression is as was suggested, but it certainly isn't a straight line and, short term, may not proceed in that direction.

But, I'm probably going to die...

You keep asserting this as unassailable fact. I don't think it is. However, even accepting that view, I don't understand how that precludes allowing gay/lesbian marriage. Gays/lesbians already...

You (and others) are really not getting it.

I don't feel like weighing in (though I have in previous threads on this subject), partly because I've got my own share of ignorance regarding the...

Now I don't feel so bad for spending time reading this thread.

That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Two. Or maybe zero.



??? Getting a legally binding contract is keeping the government out?

OK. It's apparent you work in the biz, so know, and that's certainly believable anyway. But the more important point is whether that happens overall. Do providers enter contracts with insurers...

I doubt you're correct. I doubt providers lose money when they don't get paid the rack rate, but, instead, are paid a negotiated rate. Also, the insurer doesn't pay what they "deem necessary." ...

Your scoring is overruled. The point was not "behave," but, rather, the combination with "behoove." Nicely done, Jer. Full points awarded.

I missed that memo. God damn it.

Life moderators, please add me back to the distribution list.

Quoted to emphasize the insanity.

Bushwacker's posts always have those issues. It's part of his charm. You gotta read past that. It's not that hard.

FYI, "irony" and "sarcasm" overlap, but are not coincident. Apparently. However, I recommend you all stop using the word "irony" altogether, for your own good. (I have.) It's a minefield. You...

I tend to agree with tommyvee on this. There are ways to deal with the purported problem. And I really wonder how extensive the problem is anyway.



I'm less convinced by this. Presumably...

I play clarinet and tenor sax, but neither for many years. I used to be pretty good. When I flip my clarinet mouthpiece over and play with the reed facing up, I can put out some pretty death-like...

All this stuff. Who knew there were so many teenage girls posting at TGR?

Roberto de Vicenzo. He is a stupid.

Jfost, I'll give one last try to penetrating your cocoon of self-congratulation. I think the following captures the path that you misunderstood:

No, I didn't. I explained to you what I said, but you're so wrapped up in sanctimoniously characterizing everyone else as a bigot, that you choose not to acknowledge that.

I don't think, though,...

Well, he laid out a possible motivation. If I remember correctly, though, he wasn't really a fan. I doubt OSECS was either. Maybe I'll go back and check.



That was your point, you say? ...

Yes, yes, yes. Ads are fine, but that Coast ad at the top is way too intrusive for the reason Danno identified.

The discussion did veer from the original quote (a couple or few posts ago I went back to check and saw that) - at least that part in which I was involved - but that was largely or entirely your...

You are shockingly stupid. I've seen you post some ridiculous stuff in this vein before, but now you're taking it to a whole new level. Kudos, I guess.

Gee, impressive. No one can brainwash you, can they? You must be one of those free thinkers or something, like I've heard tell about.

What the fuck is wrong with you? I don't doubt the agenda...

Yeah, I got that. I think you missed my point.



So you project. I expect the people here objecting to the Muslim outreach would also object to similar outreach to rural Americans, neither...

:nonono2:

How am I stereotyping? :confused:

Is it that you're just skimming, at most, what anyone else has posted, or can you really not be capable of understanding? And maybe go back and...

Resources are limited. We should use them where we think we'll get the best return.

Why do you insist on projecting motivations on to people that don't seem to be reasonably suggested? Is it...

No doubt. So?

Edit ...



1. No one said anything about ignoring anyone or any potential contributions. Many argued against placing special emphasis on outreach. Surely you see those are...