PDA

View Full Version : Naxo NA01 Review



Summit
10-14-2003, 09:29 PM
I attended CSAW today at Copper and I was very lucky to get a change to mess around with a Naxo NA01 binding and speak with a BCA rep about it.

Here is my review to clear up some mythes and flesh out some details not covered as deeply in the magazines.

This is NOT a first year binding. This is the second year under production.

The bindings go up to DIN 12, not 10. The DIN settings cannot be turned by fingers past DIN 5 or so... simply can't do it. The comments about a simple knock while skiing possibly changing the settings is something that could NEVER happen (unless maybe you are skiing DIN 4 but who the hell would?).

The AFD is awesome and bomber. It is designed somewhat similar to the Look AFDs. It is a moving plate and the the Naxo AFD plate is much larger than the Look AFD. It and should work great with AT boots and alpine boots. The toe side release seems great too... didn't mess with vertical release or the heel.

The plastic "shock absorber" metnioned by some that sits under the ball of the forebfoot is attatched with some sort of adhesive and not a screw... except it is NOT a shock absorber as near as I can tell, but rather a shaped piece of plastic to tilt the mount in walk mode before lifting so you can get the special Naxo stride thingy (which is reportedly a nice feeling and maybe an energy saver). When the heel is locked down it doesn't seem like it would experience any shock loading so it shouldn't need a screw.

The toe piece seems great. It's not S914 bomber, but neither are the Freerides. I'd say they are about equal. I saw four screws on the front and I think two or three for the back.

The twin poles under the foot seem plenty sturdy and the binding will provide 37mm of lift.

The binding did not seem to have much if any play while unlocked and had no play while locked down. Solid as it should be.

I wish it had 4 heel elevator settings like the Freerides have instead of just 3.

The yellow tail piece discussed by some: BCA said they were the only people who ever managed to break it. They said that design this year is different from last year (it seems fairly beefy) and the heel positions all have notchies to keep you from being able move the heel sideways in a fall which could rip the front.

The tail lockdown seems as good as the Freerides although it seems like it would be harder to lock and unlock with poles.

Thats it... it is not a wimpy binding. NAXO! IT'S WHAT'S FOR DINNER! It looks like it is as good as the Freeride possibly better in some respects and I will definately be buying the NA01 as soon as I can get one! I can't wait to try it on the snow!

And a told you so: Like I said before, if BCA is distributing it, it must be a good, reliable, and durable piece of gear.

bad_roo
10-15-2003, 04:51 AM
Thanks for that information but I think the 'i told you sos' should come after you've skied it hard...

Summit
10-15-2003, 08:36 AM
Originally posted by bad_roo
Thanks for that information but I think the 'i told you sos' should come after you've skied it hard...

Quite welcome... and a valid criticism.

homerjay
10-15-2003, 10:54 AM
If you ain't skied it, it ain't a 'review.' More like a description.

No offense, but roo is right.

Pinner
10-15-2003, 04:39 PM
What's CSAW?

Summit
10-15-2003, 11:17 PM
homer: you know what? you are absolutely right. so was roo and i said so.


Originally posted by Pinner
What's CSAW?

Colorado Snow and Avalanche Workshop
150 professional types in a room... I'm gonna post on that in the ski and snowboard forum in a few minutes.

ulty_guy
01-20-2004, 02:28 AM
so i finally got a chance to ride mine...

me: 5'10", 165 lbs
skier type: not completely useless, but very below average given the company on this board
mounted: Dynastar LBF's 178 at mounting line
boots: Lange L10's
terrain: almost completely off-piste (powder, crud, wind-glue), some tracked out, a few groomers, no bumps.
DIN: 8.5

i've never owned an AT set-up, so just stepping into them, they didn't give that "ah, solly-solidity" that's so satisfying. i'm definitely going to have to baby them more than i have any other binding (that's ok though, part of the trade off). as for the ad campaign talking about 'agro'....you won't find me hucking anything sizeable on those things (not that i ever do). for the stepping in bit, they are a bit fussy when it comes to having excess snow and ice around. this is a pain in the ass when you've been doing some hiking and then need to click in in a less than comfortable place.

once in, i felt no difference in downhill performance from an alpine binder. they bobbed/weaved/floated very sweetly. it felt torsionally rigid the whole time (while the heel was locked down). you could even feel the heel-rail-flex working when carving up the groomed. i had a few faceplants due to being a bit too forward mounted (will discuss in another thread), but every time i was in serious trouble, they mercilessly let me go. happy camper.

once when the light when completely flat, i decided to go for a little hike instead of skiing in milk. although the skin was only about 500 vertical meters, it had a good mix of flat, moderate uphill, and steeper (25-30 degrees?). on the flat, felt good to me. on the medium, this is where i felt that ergo stride really kicking in, i got more stride length and power than i expected. on the steeps is where the problems arose. it was steep enough that i had to switchback, and it was an awkward track. with the heel lift in highest setting, and working hard, the toe started to show some pretty disconcerting torsional weakness. on about every third or fourth stride, the heel would come down off the heel lift. now, i'm a skinning JONG, so maybe it was just me, but it didn't feel very comforting.

bottom-line....it's a good product, but as with any and everything, there are still trade offs.